![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lund has a good reputation. Haven't heard any complaints about Alumacraft.
Honda makes a good solid engine, because it is a four-stroke it will be legal to use it on most waters that don't have HP limitations. It is more expensive than some. I was not aware that Honda was making a jet outboard, but they are not new comers to jet propulsion. Their PWCs are big guys with rock solid reputations and few problems with their motors or jet pumps. All that being said... there are some disadvantages to your selections. The biggest being that not all Honda dealers have a competant marine mechanic on staff. While you would hope that shop service requirements would be few and far between you want to make sure that you have somembody nearby who can service it if needed. The other is the efficiency of jet outboards. Jet pumps are less efficient than propellers. As a result a jet outboard will either transfer less force to the water, or the motor will be bigger and heavier. Speed may suffer. Jets will definitely run in shallower water. In rocky clear waters they really shine. In sandy rivers they tend to wear out impellors more quickly as they are continuously taking small bit of grit and forcing them over the blades. Its much wore of you plan to skip some sandbars. On the positive side, if you plan to skip sandbars regularly the only way to go is a jet as you will make it over them. In waters that get weed choke in summer be prepared to swim. You plug up a jet pump with weeds and you can count on having to get in the water and clean it out. I wonder about the combination of a deep-V with a jet outboard. Seems to me a pad bottom design or even a flat bottom would take the most advantage of the shallow water capabilities. -- ** Public Fishing and Boating Forums ** www.YumaBassMan.com "Sergio Ramirez" wrote in message ... Hello all: I'm considering buying my first boat, and wonder if any of you folks have any advice/opinion on the following: - Lund boats or Alumacraft boats. I want a light 16' deep-V boat that I can trailer in my small Toyota pickup, which is rated for 3500 lbs trailering. Around here there are a lot of Tracker boats, but I've heard complaints on Tracker customer service and problem with leakage through the welds. They tell me Alumacraft is a good quality boat, and Lund is top of the line. - The jet propulsion engines from Honda (BF35 or BF65). They really look interesting because it allows access to shallow areas and it's quieter, but I wonder if this new technology (or perhaps not new, I don't know) is not that well developed that it's best not to get into it at this moment. I'm in central Texas and I'm looking to do mainly bass fishing around the Hill Country lakes (some of them pretty large bodies), and perhaps once in a while go to the Gulf coast to do bay fishing or close-to-shore fishing. Thanks in advance for your help Sergio |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LA Times article | Jason | General Discussion | 7 | August 26th, 2004 02:41 PM |
Article in the LA Times | Jason | Bass Fishing | 15 | August 25th, 2004 07:25 PM |
LA Times article | Jason | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | August 24th, 2004 06:34 PM |
Skeeter Boats Lawsuit | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 5 | July 21st, 2004 03:09 AM |
Cork Small Boats Festival 2003 Report | Jim Clohessy | UK Sea Fishing | 0 | October 7th, 2003 01:49 PM |