![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 May 2005 13:21:19 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Thank god there's still a few Democrats on the federal bench. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/27/national/27dams.html? It's no wonder the Bush administration is fighting so hard to stack the courts with their ideologues. "It was the third time that federal courts in Portland have rejected the fisheries services analysis of how federal actions might affect the fish and what could be done. The first two were in the Clinton administration. The second, completed shortly before George W. Bush was inaugurated, Ed. Note - from an objective standpoint, this is a leading phrase; it makes no possible difference Bush if it was completed 1 second or 500 years before he was in. Why not say it was completed at the very end of the Clinton administration, or even, it was completed 26 years after the Beatles broke up. included the possibility of dam removal, as a last resort, to protect the fish." So, Ken, do you prefer golf balls or barbeque forks? HTH, Dick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|