A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

cabelas beginner flies



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 31st, 2005, 06:22 PM
asadi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Cleveland"

I know several *excellent* fishermen who fish
5 wt. rods virtually everywhere, from the spring creeks of SW
Wisconsin to the tag alder jungles up north to the smallmouth bass
rivers that are everywhere up here to the big rivers in Montana.


g.c.

......and a couple not so excellent fisherman who use a five weights....

john


  #12  
Old June 1st, 2005, 02:08 PM
Goat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"asadi" wrote

"George Cleveland"


I know several *excellent* fishermen who fish
5 wt. rods virtually everywhere, from the spring creeks of SW
Wisconsin to the tag alder jungles up north to the smallmouth bass
rivers that are everywhere up here to the big rivers in Montana.


g.c.

.....and a couple not so excellent fisherman who use a five weights....

john

True, soooo true.
but I do love my 5 wt rod.

~Chad


  #13  
Old June 1st, 2005, 03:26 PM
George Cleveland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:22:45 -0500, Bob Patton
wrote:

Joe wrote:
But do you think the shorter rod will be necessary anyway, for the
places I want to fish? I cant imagine hauling a 9-footer into some of
these places. I've thought about getting a second heavier and longer
rod for other situations, but dont even know if I am going to like
using the first one yet...


The longer rod will be a little more versatile, but if you spend too
much time worrying about which rod, reel, backing, line, leader, tippet,
and fly to use, then you'll never get to the water and learn what this
is all about in the first place.

Without a little help getting started you may find yourself bewildered.
I'd find a good fly shop somewhere close and get some advice there about
fly selection and where to fish. And buy the rod there, too.

Mail-order is fine for people who know what they want. But folks who
need advice should join the local chapter of Trout Unlimited or
Federation of Fly Fishers and buy their gear from somebody local.

Having said all that . . . I see that Cabela's has an 8 1/2 foot
5-weight on sale for 90 bucks. I think that'd be hard to beat. Wait
until you have some more experience before going for a lighter rod.

Bob


If you do go the Cabela's route see if you can pick up a combo with
their new Prestige Plus mid-arbor reel. I received one yesterday as
part of a thank you gift from a message board on which I moderate.
Seems to be a very nicely put together reel for the price (for a
KPOS). Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag.


g.c.
  #14  
Old June 1st, 2005, 03:31 PM
Wayne Knight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



George Cleveland wrote:

Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag.


Good Lord man, a fly reel has got to make some noise!

  #15  
Old June 1st, 2005, 11:06 PM
Joe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



If you do go the Cabela's route see if you can pick up a combo with
their new Prestige Plus mid-arbor reel. I received one yesterday as
part of a thank you gift from a message board on which I moderate.
Seems to be a very nicely put together reel for the price (for a
KPOS). Silent retreive and only a very subtle click on the drag.



Someone else warned me about the noisy Cahill reel that comes with
Cabelas lowest price combo, but the Prestige Plus combo was a bit
beyond my budget. After long indecision I decided to get the shorter 4
wt rod combo with CSR reel. If the CSR's suck be nice and dont tell me,
presumably they are a little nicer than the Cahills though I dont know
how quiet they are. I spoke with a couple local flyfishers, one said he
would go with a 9 foot rod and the other said thats what he started
with and he hated it, so I went with the guy who said what I wanted to
hear and ordered a 7.5 footer. It'll be good enough to see if I like
this ff stuff or not, I can always get another rod later. I will
definitely buy my flies locally and hopefully get some more local
advice along with them. I will practice with my local bluegills before
taking it into the brush. I cant wait to get started!

  #16  
Old June 4th, 2005, 03:03 PM
Jeff Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

George Cleveland wrote:


Who wonders how many people can *always* lay a fly down in a 6" circle
at 40'.



well...um... i can - it's easy...of course, i'm assuming there's no
wind, a drunk front hasn't moved in, the landscape is level and
unforested, the circle is well-lit or marked (orange paint works), i can
use a big fly, and i can manage to walk that far...hell, i can lay a fly
down in that size circle - even a smaller one - everytime! i'll be in
your area in sept. and i'll show ya.

da tar heel yooper tourist
  #17  
Old June 5th, 2005, 06:17 AM
jeffc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
I am new to ff, will be ordering a Cabelas 5 piece pack rod/reel combo
tomorrow. Is there anything you would recommend in flies for a beginner
that I can also get from Cabelas (without spending $50, hopefully)? I
will be fishing primarily small streams and brookie creeks roughly
10-30 feet wide, in northern WI and MN . I havent yet decided whether
to go with a 3 or 4 wgt, although I'm leaning towards the 4 because it
comes in a shorter length (7'6") and I think that will work better on
the small creeks (and be easier to learn with?). Any thougts on that
choice will also be appreciated though.


Up to a point, longer rods are usually easier to cast. As are heavier lines
(4,5,6 compared to 1,2,3) Having said that, my favorite small stream rod is
a 7.5 foot 4 wt. I'd buy my flies at a shop where you can see them first.


  #18  
Old June 5th, 2005, 06:18 AM
jeffc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Don Phillipson" wrote in message
...

1. When learning to cast, a longer rod is usually
an easier tool. Do not try fishing in confined spaces
until you cast instinctively, e.g. can place your fly on
within 6 inches accuracy at a range of 40 feet without
even thinking about.


Um, I don't even think I can do that, and I manage to catch some fish
sometimes.


  #19  
Old June 5th, 2005, 06:20 AM
jeffc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
But do you think the shorter rod will be necessary anyway, for the
places I want to fish? I cant imagine hauling a 9-footer into some of
these places. I've thought about getting a second heavier and longer
rod for other situations, but dont even know if I am going to like
using the first one yet...


Sometimes the places are so tight that the longer rod is helpful because you
can't make a full cast - you just sort of reach the line out there. And
don't worry you don't make too many 40 foot casts on small streams. Still,
a shorter rod like 7.5 feet is probably easier to maneuver on small streams.


  #20  
Old June 7th, 2005, 04:05 AM
Joe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



jeffc wrote:

Up to a point, longer rods are usually easier to cast. As are heavier lines
(4,5,6 compared to 1,2,3) Having said that, my favorite small stream rod is
a 7.5 foot 4 wt. I'd buy my flies at a shop where you can see them first.


Thats exactly the rod I bought, a Cabelas Stowaway 4 wt 7.5' and it
arrived today. I'm no expert on flyfishing but I know cheap crappy
merchandise when I see it. I'm very happy to say I did not see anything
of the sort when I opened my package. The rod is beautiful and seems
very well-made, and the reel seems well made and is very functional (in
my living room anyway). But on top of that it came with a cordura wrap
with slots for each section, and two very nice cases, a tube and a pack
case with handle, and a seperate paded reel case. Nothing about this
package appears cheap. I am quite impressed and if it works half as
well as it appears to be made, I will be very happy. Tomorrow I head to
the fly shop for flies.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd No left turn Fly Fishing 0 April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM
Ugly Flies Guy Thornberg Fly Fishing 11 February 2nd, 2005 08:35 AM
Does anyone tie or use tube flies? Sierra fisher Fly Fishing Tying 2 May 15th, 2004 11:09 PM
Fly shop in Thailand (long0 Joe McIntosh Fly Fishing 26 December 8th, 2003 07:06 AM
Fly shops online... Greg LaPorta Fly Fishing 15 November 3rd, 2003 09:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.