![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that
you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? And let's break the components down to the head, middle and tail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tmon wrote:
I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? And let's break the components down to the head, middle and tail. The number one biggest mistake I see inexperienced people make is to wade right into a pool to the top of your waders, without regard to where the fish might be. I always see people standing where they should be fishing, and wading where it should be fished from the bank. My friends and I joke about this by figuring that guys think, "I bought the waders, so by God I will get them wet". Pete Collin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tmon" wrote in message ... I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? Well, sloppy wading will do it. Then again, so will bad casting, a bad approach, drag on the fly, slapping the line (or the bug) down on the water, large rocks thrown into the pool, the mere presence of the line....or the leader.....or the fly....etc. I guess you might say it's highly variable. Having tested some of the clear mountain brooks in western North Carolina in the company of fishermen who know them well, I'd suggest they could probably tell you more about it. Personally, I'm inclined to believe that thinking about the worst (problematic under any circumstances) will cause one to pay less than enough attention to all the rest. And let's break the components down to the head, middle and tail. On a twenty foot diameter pool on Snowbird (yeah, there are a few that large) or an eight footer on Flume creek (not unheard of) the distinction is entirely theoretical and of absolutely no practical use. Wolfgang who realizes that big waters......say, the ontonagon, for example......are another matter entirely. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tmon wrote:
I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? And let's break the components down to the head, middle and tail. Never, ever, under any circumstances, toss a big rock into the middle of the pool. That is, unless you have to move the fish to a more fishable lie. :-) -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "tmon" wrote in message ... I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? Well, sloppy wading will do it. Then again, so will bad casting, a bad approach, drag on the fly, slapping the line (or the bug) down on the water, large rocks thrown into the pool, the mere presence of the line....or the leader.....or the fly....etc. I guess you might say it's highly variable. Having tested some of the clear mountain brooks in western North Carolina in the company of fishermen who know them well, I'd suggest they could probably tell you more about it. well, i feel eminently qualified to answer this question, having more likely than not spooked more trout than any other living person south of maryland (thanks for taking the heat, frank). and my answer is this: being seen. i have caught fish after fish from a run or pool, with the line sawing back and forth above and under the water, which i am certain caught the attention of every living being in that piece of water. but they didn't *see* my form, a large, looming presence, not unlike a bear, or the shadow of a kingfisher, wheeling briefly above the surface of their world, or the large, dark, sinewy image of an otter, moving relentlessly and without restraint in the very heart of their home. the thrashing of their brother, and his temporary absence, was inexplicable, and therefore, devoid of threat. and i have failed to catch fish after fish when i waded slowly, and quietly as a minnow, laying out line softly; but because of my rod's abrupt, slanted shadow, or my own form, as described above, i have represented a killer, from time unrecorded. the lesson for those of us who fish close to fish, is this: stay low, stay as far away from your quarry as possible. that is what makes fishing in freestone streams in the eastern mountains so tough. you have to have the strength and patience to make yourself so much smaller than you are. it is painful, and becomes more difficult each year, so that the expected benefit of experience becomes a tragic burden, as age takes its inevitable toll. and that is a statement that does not consider the often immense effort of just getting to the water, wading it, and coming out. so, forget length of rod and tippet, and the color or size of your fly. it's all about stealth. and stealth, like many other things desirable, is mostly for the young. yfitons wayno |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:59:12 GMT, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote: (snipped) and my answer is this: being seen. i have caught fish after fish from a run or pool, with the line sawing back and forth above and under the water, which i am certain caught the attention of every living being in that piece of water. but they didn't *see* my form, a large, looming presence, not unlike a bear, or the shadow of a kingfisher, wheeling briefly above the surface of their world, or the large, dark, sinewy image of an otter, moving relentlessly and without restraint in the very heart of their home. the thrashing of their brother, and his temporary absence, was inexplicable, and therefore, devoid of threat. Yep. Just because I can't hook them doesn't mean I can't observe them. And when they see a human form standing up, they go away. They don't come back for varying amounts of time. Trout that are frequently bothered come back sooner, because nothing has happened, and the by now sitting or squatting person no longer registers as what I assume is a bear to them. Shadows and stealth are your friends and the enemies of the trout. Low profiles are your friends. I have a major problem because I like to watch them in very clear water and / or stand up to my knees in the water in bright sunshine. Not that that's my only problem, but it's up there in tops in errors. Cyli r.bc: vixen. Minnow goddess. Speaker to squirrels. Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. http://www.visi.com/~cyli email: lid (strip the .invalid to email) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Harrison wrote:
and my answer is this: being seen. i have caught fish after fish from a run or pool, with the line sawing back and forth above and under the water, which i am certain caught the attention of every living being in that piece of water. but they didn't *see* my form, a large, looming presence, not unlike a bear, or the shadow of a kingfisher, wheeling briefly above the surface of their world, or the large, dark, sinewy image of an otter, moving relentlessly and without restraint in the very heart of their home. the thrashing of their brother, and his temporary absence, was inexplicable, and therefore, devoid of threat. and i have failed to catch fish after fish when i waded slowly, and quietly as a minnow, laying out line softly; but because of my rod's abrupt, slanted shadow, or my own form, as described above, i have represented a killer, from time unrecorded. the lesson for those of us who fish close to fish, is this: stay low, stay as far away from your quarry as possible. that is what makes fishing in freestone streams in the eastern mountains so tough. you have to have the strength and patience to make yourself so much smaller than you are. it is painful, and becomes more difficult each year, so that the expected benefit of experience becomes a tragic burden, as age takes its inevitable toll. and that is a statement that does not consider the often immense effort of just getting to the water, wading it, and coming out. so, forget length of rod and tippet, and the color or size of your fly. it's all about stealth. and stealth, like many other things desirable, is mostly for the young. Nicely stated. I hope you don't mind if I print this post and keep it with me on my trip to Graham County later this month. Chuck Vance (who has been known to be a bit overzealous in approaching fishy-looking water) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Harrison wrote:
"Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "tmon" wrote in message ... I've often wondered about this. What is the single worst thing that you can do to put down feeding fish in a pool? Sloppy wading? Bad cast? Bad approach where you line feeding fish? Drag on a dry? Well, sloppy wading will do it. Then again, so will bad casting, a bad approach, drag on the fly, slapping the line (or the bug) down on the water, large rocks thrown into the pool, the mere presence of the line....or the leader.....or the fly....etc. I guess you might say it's highly variable. Having tested some of the clear mountain brooks in western North Carolina in the company of fishermen who know them well, I'd suggest they could probably tell you more about it. well, i feel eminently qualified to answer this question, having more likely than not spooked more trout than any other living person south of maryland (thanks for taking the heat, frank). and my answer is this: being seen. snip I have often wanted to visit and fish the mountain streams of TONS, and now it seems I'll be able to pack lighter by leaving my fishing gear at home. Being 6'3" and a svelte 265 lbs makes a helluva shadow on big water, so I'd probably cover the entire Snowbird area with darkness. One thing I've found that *does* help me catch some fish in crystal clear water (from time to time) is to start fishing before I enter the water and then, once I do wade in, staying in one spot while I cast to different runs. That way, if I do spook the fish during the wade-in, I have a chance of them returning. I've also been trying to minimize other body movement, just moving my forearm for casting, and slowing down any other movement (like changing flies, adding tippet, etc.) to a very slow-motion pace. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Harrison wrote:
snip it's all about stealth. and stealth, like many other things desirable, is mostly for the young. Ain't it the truth. Five days of crawling around in those mountain streams left me bruised, abraded, sore and exhausted. Can't wait to do it again, I'm thinking the second week of October right before hunting season makes wandering around in the woods a scary proposition. -- Ken Fortenberry |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
strange? trout behavior | Wayne Harrison | Fly Fishing | 14 | October 27th, 2004 12:13 PM |
Soft plastics found in trout stomachs | Shawn | Bass Fishing | 28 | August 26th, 2004 05:15 AM |
Meeting report: 19th Century North America trout propagation | William Claspy | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2004 02:37 PM |
Gorillas, Trout Fishing, Upper Delaware River | Vito Dolce LaPesca | Fly Fishing | 0 | March 1st, 2004 02:07 PM |
Trout fishing with worms | mary | Fly Fishing | 33 | January 24th, 2004 06:52 PM |