![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Fortenberry wrote: Yeah, and I'd be shocked to learn that fish were caught from that "lake". Charlie's pix look like a lake but the weedbeds extend far out from the shore, they almost met in the middle the year I hiked by there, making fishing impossible most of the fishing season. Even if you could somehow cast over all the weeds and accidentally hook a fish you'd never be able to drag it back through all the weeds to land it. i don't know where you fished or what you "hiked by", but it sure wasn't the fawn lake i saw...probably one of those other little weedbed lakes on the way to fawn lake. When were you there? I posted a series of large file pics for others to see...i'll reduce the file size tonight and repost just the lake pics so you will have no doubt it's a lake full of water and not marshy, swampy, or full of weedbeds. You can argue this one all you want, but you're wrong about the fawn lake we personally visited and observed last week (i.e., mid-July 2005, which i assume is within the "fishing season" period you reference). Fawn Lake is not huge, but it's not small either. It's deep and wide. It doesn't dry up according to Craig Matthews and Steve H. at the Blue Ribbon. It holds big brook trout. We all witnessed the rises. Warren saw the big fish. The rises were within casting distance. the fish were eating damselflies in big splashy takes. I saw one smaller fish jump fully from the water after something. There appeared to be some small mayfly hatches as well. There weren't any weeds or weedbeds that would inhibit casting to or landing a fish. There were no above-bottom or above-surface weeds at all. i'm a poor distance caster, and i got a parachute adams out to the area of the rises. warren is a good distance caster and he did a much better job than i of reaching the area of the rises and splashes in front of him. ask him about the fish he saw. a float tube is obviously the preferable manner of fishing the lake. The lake was entirely free of any weeds growing up to or above the surface from the bottom. In one of Charlie's pictures of Fawn Lake, I'm walking/standing on a log that was just below the water surface. The footing was mucky on the shore bottom and i'd sink in above my ankles walking out to the drop off. jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: Even if you could somehow cast over all the weeds and accidentally hook a fish you'd never be able to drag it back through all the weeds to land it. i don't know where you fished or what you "hiked by", but it sure wasn't the fawn lake i saw...probably one of those other little weedbed lakes on the way to fawn lake. Jeff - sorry to interrupt (it's really pretty funny), but since you have now found Fawn Lake to be real, would you make the trip again? It looks like some of the prettiest country on God's earth, but then again, I can only imagine just about all of the Yellowstone area is. After viewing your photos, it's definitely on my to-do list. -- TL, Tim ------------------------ http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim J." wrote It looks like some of the prettiest country on God's earth, but then again, I can only imagine just about all of the Yellowstone area is. may be hard to believe, but mho is that the area north of yellowstone, following the madison north to ennis (about 60 miles?), and the surrounding mountains, is even more breathtaking than the park itself. yfitons wayno |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim J. wrote: Jeff - sorry to interrupt (it's really pretty funny), but since you have now found Fawn Lake to be real, would you make the trip again? It looks like some of the prettiest country on God's earth, but then again, I can only imagine just about all of the Yellowstone area is. After viewing your photos, it's definitely on my to-do list. Warren and I discussed a camping trip to the area. It's a beautiful place and I'd go again, no question. The hike round trip staying on the marked trail according to Warren's GPS was almost 14 miles. On the way out, we departed the trail and made a bee-line down the mountain to the car once we saw the parking area, saving about 1-2 miles. Some of the views are inspiring...but that's true about a lot of Yellowstone. It's not a hard hike by any means, though there are a few spots where we all stopped to get our breath along the way. The lake isn't clearly visible from the trail, but it's close enough to the established campsites by the Gardner that it's an easy walk. Fawn Creek and the Gardner near Fawn Lake have little brookies eager to attack a fly. On our way out, we spent about an hour and had a lot of fun catching those fish. I bet they'd be tasty for breakfast or supper. Warren caught 5 out of one pretty run. This trip wasn't really planned around fishing the lake...we honestly didn't know what we'd find. I'm not very experienced in getting those big lake brookies yet, but next time i'll have ample streamers, damselflies, and chironomids, and hopefully a float tube. It would be a pleasant place to float away a day...unless of course forty happens by, in which case i guess the lake turns into a weedbed. g jeff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" This trip wasn't really planned around fishing the lake...we honestly didn't know what we'd find. I'm not very experienced in getting those big lake brookies yet, but next time i'll have ample streamers, damselflies, and chironomids, and hopefully a float tube. It would be a pleasant place to float away a day...unless of course forty happens by, in which case i guess the lake turns into a weedbed. g jeff Methinks that you just exposed to the light of day a 40 favorite secret spot- no! no! stay away don't go there!there ain't no fish there!- yada yada yada. jh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Hightower wrote: Methinks that you just exposed to the light of day a 40 favorite secret spot- no! no! stay away don't go there!there ain't no fish there!- yada yada yada. jh some of us assumed that might be forty's response when confronted with the reality of Fawn Lake...but hell, you gotta admire the fella for giving truth to the old joke about "that's my story and i'm sticking to it!" of course, the story does seem to change from time to time. jeff (good seeing you again john...next time, hope you'll stick around longer) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" jeff (good seeing you again john...next time, hope you'll stick around longer) I hope so too- I was really disappointed things didn't work out this year for the trip. I really would have liked to spent a day fishing with you and IJ and I really wanted to do slough this year. I did get a day fishing calibaetis on Quake and I really enjoyed that. Its kind of funny, but I kind of like still fishing on lakes- relaxing, you can ponder the scenery and the meaning of life etc. But, I get really bored fishing on big slow rivers- go figure. I had hoped to squeeze Elk Lake (where IJ skunked us all last year) and the Ruby in also- but that was just too many miles for a 3 day whirlwind tour. I don't think I'll ever get the picture of IJ holding a flaming can of white gas with that look of "uh oh" on his face out of my mind though. jh |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Hightower" wrote in message ... "Jeff" This trip wasn't really planned around fishing the lake...we honestly didn't know what we'd find. I'm not very experienced in getting those big lake brookies yet, but next time i'll have ample streamers, damselflies, and chironomids, and hopefully a float tube. It would be a pleasant place to float away a day...unless of course forty happens by, in which case i guess the lake turns into a weedbed. g jeff Methinks that you just exposed to the light of day a 40 favorite secret spot- no! no! stay away don't go there!there ain't no fish there!- yada yada yada. That's the card he'll play. Experience suggests that this is exactly why he never went there. Wolfgang believe what you will......but then, that's what we do, ainna? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
Jeff - sorry to interrupt (it's really pretty funny), but since you have now found Fawn Lake to be real, would you make the trip again? ... Fawn Weedbed is a *great* touron destination. Just read the brochures and look at Chuckie Choc's pictures. Hell, Jeffie recommended it before he'd ever even seen it, it's *that* good. Seriously, given all that Yellowstone has to offer nobody in their right mind would make Fawn Weedbed a fishing destination or even recommend that grizzly area as one worth an expensive Yellowstone vacation with a horse outfitter as Jeffie did sight unseen. I've been told to fish it just after ice out, after I complained bitterly to the author of a guide book about wasting my time looking at it. And yes Choc, the bitter complaining did happen while seated on a barstool. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message news ![]() ...yes Choc, the bitter complaining did happen while seated on a barstool. As, we are left to presume in light of the evidence, did the reconnaissance. By now, it must have occurred even to you that they told you Fawn lake isn't worth going to simply because they didn't like you......ainna? ![]() Wolfgang |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
montana - western clave | Jeff Miller | Fly Fishing | 17 | February 18th, 2005 03:54 PM |