A reason to not fish weighted stuff

Wolfgang wrote:
"JDOE" wrote in message
...
scumbag.

O.k.

However, there still wasn't anything in that article about fly
fishing. The object still doesn't look particularly round. You
still don't seem to know who you are.....

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

and unless you're in jolly olde England, wot?.......you still seem to
be having a bit of trouble with your singular and plural parts of
speech.
On the other hand, since you'll never see this, I guess it really
doesn't matter, eh?

I plonked him a long time ago, but some asshole always comes along and
replies to his posts and then the whole exercise is moot.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

scumbag.

O.k.

However, there still wasn't anything in that article about fly
fishing. The object still doesn't look particularly round. You
still don't seem to know who you are.....

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

and unless you're in jolly olde England, wot?.......you still seem to
be having a bit of trouble with your singular and plural parts of
speech.
On the other hand, since you'll never see this, I guess it really
doesn't matter, eh?

I plonked him a long time ago, but some asshole always comes along and
replies to his posts and then the whole exercise is moot.

Yeah, I know what you mean. They do things like reply leaving the entirety
of the previous plonked poster pointedly present.

--
Frank Reid
Euthanize to respond

Frank Reid typed:
scumbag.

O.k.

However, there still wasn't anything in that article about fly
fishing. The object still doesn't look particularly round. You
still don't seem to know who you are.....

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

and unless you're in jolly olde England, wot?.......you still seem
to be having a bit of trouble with your singular and plural parts of
speech.
On the other hand, since you'll never see this, I guess it really
doesn't matter, eh?

I plonked him a long time ago, but some asshole always comes along
and replies to his posts and then the whole exercise is moot.

Yeah, I know what you mean. They do things like reply leaving the
entirety of the previous plonked poster pointedly present.

Precisely!
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

Tim J. wrote:
Frank Reid typed:
Yeah, I know what you mean. They do things like reply leaving the
entirety of the previous plonked poster pointedly present.

Precisely!

Any additional alliteration and we'll all need an Advil.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Ken Fortenberry typed:
Tim J. wrote:
Frank Reid typed:
Yeah, I know what you mean. They do things like reply leaving the
entirety of the previous plonked poster pointedly present.

Precisely!

Any additional alliteration and we'll all need an Advil.

Party pooper.
--
TL,
Tim
------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

In article ,
"Tim J." wrote:

Wolfgang wrote:
"JDOE" wrote in message
...
scumbag.

O.k.

However, there still wasn't anything in that article about fly
fishing. The object still doesn't look particularly round. You
still don't seem to know who you are.....

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

and unless you're in jolly olde England, wot?.......you still seem to
be having a bit of trouble with your singular and plural parts of
speech.
On the other hand, since you'll never see this, I guess it really
doesn't matter, eh?

I plonked him a long time ago, but some asshole always comes along and
replies to his posts and then the whole exercise is moot.


I know what you mean! Now I have to see his response.

--
Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

"JDOE" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Tim J." wrote:

Wolfgang wrote:
"JDOE" wrote in message
...
scumbag.

O.k.

However, there still wasn't anything in that article about fly
fishing. The object still doesn't look particularly round. You
still don't seem to know who you are.....

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

and unless you're in jolly olde England, wot?.......you still seem to
be having a bit of trouble with your singular and plural parts of
speech.
On the other hand, since you'll never see this, I guess it really
doesn't matter, eh?

I plonked him a long time ago, but some asshole always comes along and
replies to his posts and then the whole exercise is moot.


I know what you mean! Now I have to see his response.

Hoo boy.

Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

Somewhere in America a community rests secure, comfortable, and content in
the knowledge that theirs is still on duty.......and justifiably so.

Wolfgang

SNIP
I know what you mean! Now I have to see his response.

--
Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

It seems that most "plonkers" ( for want of a better expression), put more
emphasis on the actual "plonking", indeed, going to some lengths to
publicise the "plonk",than on the fact that they purportedly no longer wish
to read anything from the "plonkees".

Should you not wish to see either originals, or responses, then a filter
with the content "Wofgang" should serve your purpose quite admirably.

This may well result in you never reading anything from Goethe, but, into
every life a little rain must fall, and he has not posted here recently in
any case.

TL
MC

Mike Connor wrote:
SNIP
I know what you mean! Now I have to see his response.
--
Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

It seems that most "plonkers" ( for want of a better expression), put
more emphasis on the actual "plonking", indeed, going to some lengths
to publicise the "plonk",than on the fact that they purportedly no
longer wish to read anything from the "plonkees".

Should you not wish to see either originals, or responses, then a
filter with the content "Wofgang" should serve your purpose quite
admirably.
This may well result in you never reading anything from Goethe, but,
into every life a little rain must fall, and he has not posted here
recently in any case.

This, of course, assumes the not-to-be-named plonker would have the
ability and skills to create said filter. We've already proven that some
not-to-be-named plonkers can't buy a clue.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:24:53 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote:

Mike Connor wrote:
SNIP
I know what you mean! Now I have to see his response.
--
Somewhere in Texas a village is missing their Idiot.

It seems that most "plonkers" ( for want of a better expression), put
more emphasis on the actual "plonking", indeed, going to some lengths
to publicise the "plonk",than on the fact that they purportedly no
longer wish to read anything from the "plonkees".

Should you not wish to see either originals, or responses, then a
filter with the content "Wofgang" should serve your purpose quite
admirably.
This may well result in you never reading anything from Goethe, but,
into every life a little rain must fall, and he has not posted here
recently in any case.

This, of course, assumes the not-to-be-named plonker would have the
ability and skills to create said filter. We've already proven that some
not-to-be-named plonkers can't buy a clue.

Besides, a statistic I just made up shows 99.99% of all public plonkings are
complete bullcrap...