Fly photo reference

In article .com,
wrote:

[Latin nn sequitur, it does not follow : nn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequ, to follow.]

The interesting thing about this, of course, is that it a deponent verb
- active in meaning, but passive in form.

HTH

Lazarus

--
Remover the rock from the email address

On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:24:44 +0000, Lazarus Cooke
wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:

[Latin nn sequitur, it does not follow : nn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequ, to follow.]

The interesting thing about this, of course, is that it a deponent verb
- active in meaning, but passive in form.

Is THAT the interesting thing about this? I would have guessed it was
something like, oh, say, Ken didn't blame it on the Bush administration
and claim the Dems could fix it, RW didn't offer up that when Clinton
did it personally and repeatedly it was trivial but that Bush should be
imprisoned for being within 100 nautical miles of someone who thought
about it, you didn't claim it was all America's fault, Louie didn't
accuse it of claiming a Purple Heart it didn't earn, Sarge didn't blame
it on the Jew...er, Zionists, Wolfgang didn't take 437 lines to argue
with it, wayno didn't try to, er, "change" it, Reid didn't fall over it,
Church didn't killfill it, BJ didn't call it "Laten," Peter didn't claim
the Canadians invented it...well, OK, they didn't actually INVENT it,
but they use it better, and I didn't make any smart-assed remarks
about...well, OK, so that's one thing taken care of...

H _T_ H,
R
....Reform?! Oh, ****...FIGHT!...

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:24:44 +0000, Lazarus Cooke
wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:

[Latin nn sequitur, it does not follow : nn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequ, to follow.]

The interesting thing about this, of course, is that it a deponent verb
- active in meaning, but passive in form.

Is THAT the interesting thing about this? I would have guessed it was
something like, oh, say, Ken didn't blame it on the Bush administration
and claim the Dems could fix it, RW didn't offer up that when Clinton
did it personally and repeatedly it was trivial but that Bush should be
imprisoned for being within 100 nautical miles of someone who thought
about it, you didn't claim it was all America's fault, Louie didn't
accuse it of claiming a Purple Heart it didn't earn, Sarge didn't blame
it on the Jew...er, Zionists, Wolfgang didn't take 437 lines to argue
with it, wayno didn't try to, er, "change" it, Reid didn't fall over it,
Church didn't killfill it, BJ didn't call it "Laten," Peter didn't claim
the Canadians invented it...well, OK, they didn't actually INVENT it,
but they use it better, and I didn't make any smart-assed remarks
about...well, OK, so that's one thing taken care of...


No, those aren't the interesting things about it. (And in fact America
appears to come out of this one comparatively unscathed.)

Neither is the fact that I may have spelt "deponent" wrong, but can't
be bothered to check.

Lazarus

--
Remover the rock from the email address

Lazarus Cooke wrote:

No, those aren't the interesting things about it. (And in fact America
appears to come out of this one comparatively unscathed.)


What's disturbing to me is that, according to
http://www.frappr.com/roff, North America has become dangerously
overpopulated with flyfishermen. I don't think our resources can hold up
under this pressure.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

I like fishing yellow humpys with a gold ribbed hares ear nymph dropper.
That's just me though.

wrote:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:24:44 +0000, Lazarus Cooke
wrote:


In article .com,
wrote:


[Latin nn sequitur, it does not follow : nn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequ, to follow.]

The interesting thing about this, of course, is that it a deponent verb
- active in meaning, but passive in form.


Is THAT the interesting thing about this? I would have guessed it was
something like, oh, say, Ken didn't blame it on the Bush administration
and claim the Dems could fix it, RW didn't offer up that when Clinton
did it personally and repeatedly it was trivial but that Bush should be
imprisoned for being within 100 nautical miles of someone who thought
about it, you didn't claim it was all America's fault, Louie didn't
accuse it of claiming a Purple Heart it didn't earn, Sarge didn't blame
it on the Jew...er, Zionists, Wolfgang didn't take 437 lines to argue
with it, wayno didn't try to, er, "change" it, Reid didn't fall over it,
Church didn't killfill it, BJ didn't call it "Laten," Peter didn't claim
the Canadians invented it...well, OK, they didn't actually INVENT it,
but they use it better, and I didn't make any smart-assed remarks
about...well, OK, so that's one thing taken care of...

H _T_ H,
R
...Reform?! Oh, ****...FIGHT!...

wrote in message
...
SNIP SNIP
"Sarge didn't blame it on the Jew...er, Zionists, . . . . "

So Dean, what do you know about the movers and shakers in your particular
benighted home turf, bringing in undocumented workers and scamming the Red
Cross shelters for free housing and food? You know, exploiting the tragedy
to steal a few more bucks? You must know something. Its happened real close
to you. Really close.

Or when uncomfortable information comes up about the local "movers and
shakers" do you somehow work in the anti-Semitic angle as a cover? Teach you
that at Yale did they? Hell, claiming the Sheriff who did the raid on the
illegals dumped by the "contractors" at the shelter was "discriminating
against Latinos" worked to intimidate him, AND to confuse the lib reporters
from the national media. Whose idea was that? Certainly got the Sheriff to
stay away from the drug dealers.

For something happening right next door, and evidently in businesses you
took the trouble to say were included in the new "plantation," you have been
strangely silent. Surely you must have some insight into this scamming of
the Red Cross and the use of undocumented workers in the cleanup . . so
very close to home. Were you not all over the Red Cross case awhile back?
But now . . . nothing to say.

Dave
Ideology fa schifo

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:12:04 GMT, Jim Davis
wrote:

I like fishing yellow humpys with a gold ribbed hares ear nymph dropper.
That's just me though.

You sick, twisted degenerate...may you be forced to support Republican
candidates...well, unless you already support Republicans, in which case
may you be forced to support Dems...all in States in which you've
already supported someone...and of a species you've already supported...