![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basically Wolfgang, a turd is a turd no matter how you paint it ;-)
Warren "Wolfgang" wrote in message ... "go-bassn" wrote in message ... & one more color than the common cormorant... Hm.... Both the beginning and the end of that sentence got chopped off somehow before it got to my screen. ![]() But, hey, the middle part is really pretty! ![]() Like I said, cormorants with colorS... Well, no, what you actually wrote was: "Loons=Cormorants w/color". O.k., so, this gets confusing real quick. If loons are cormorants with color, it naturally follows (that is, it's implicit) that cormorants are loons WITHOUT color, which is to say that cormorants are entirely colorless. But, others have suggested that loons have TWO colors. Still o.k. so far.....this doesn't violate the loons=cormorants w/color postulate. But, right up at the top of this page you clearly state that loons have ONE more color than the common cormorant. You see the problem here? ![]() Wolfgang who, while he makes no claim to understanding science, sure does think it's a whole lot of fun watching others do it. ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|