A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Whitefish behavior



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 7th, 2005, 03:41 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Whitefish behavior

February, 1999, was also a month with no full moon, making January and
March both "Blue Moon" months; i.e., months with two full moons.

--Steve
who just thought you'd like to know.

  #2  
Old December 7th, 2005, 04:22 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Whitefish behavior


"FlyCaughtInTree" wrote in message
oups.com...
February, 1999, was also a month with no full moon, making January and
March both "Blue Moon" months; i.e., months with two full moons.

--Steve
who just thought you'd like to know.


Oh well, if we're going to be sticklers for a germ of truth in facts, then I
might as well point out that there WAS in fact a full moon at 16:27 UTC on
the 10th of February in 1865.

There was no full moon in February in 1866, 1885, 1915, 1934, or 1961, as
well as 1999 as you pointed out above. In 1972 a full moon occurred at 3:12
UTC on February 29th.*

Wolfgang
*all data presented here, courtesy of the United States Naval Observatory**:

http://mach.usno.navy.mil/

**presumably, no chief petty officers were involved in the preparation of
the data available at this site.


  #3  
Old December 7th, 2005, 05:16 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Whitefish behavior

**presumably, no chief petty officers were involved in the preparation of
the data available at this site.


....but maybe a few snippy seamen....

--Steve
who thanks Wolfgang for the elaboration ( I was sure that there were
more, but I was pressed for time and I had actually lived through this
one, as well as the one in 1961, although I was unaware at the time)

  #4  
Old December 7th, 2005, 05:23 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Whitefish behavior


"FlyCaughtInTree" wrote in message
ps.com...
**presumably, no chief petty officers were involved in the preparation of
the data available at this site.


...but maybe a few snippy seamen....

--Steve
who thanks Wolfgang for the elaboration ( I was sure that there were
more, but I was pressed for time and I had actually lived through this
one, as well as the one in 1961,


Presumably, given the number in the last century and a half or so, there
have been many others. I haven't found a source that lists them......and
I'm not really inclined to try.

although I was unaware at the time)


'61 was o.k. for me. It's pretty much the late 60s through the mid 70s that
I was unaware.

Wolfgang
who supposes he must have had a pretty good time, though.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fly fishing for whitefish Bob Fly Fishing 1 July 17th, 2005 04:58 AM
strange? trout behavior Wayne Harrison Fly Fishing 14 October 27th, 2004 12:13 PM
weird bass behavior G. M. Zimmermann Bass Fishing 0 October 4th, 2004 09:33 AM
Trout behavior Sam Matthews Fly Fishing 57 July 9th, 2004 07:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.