![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The old & renouned Zebco/Abu Cardinal series spinning reels all had rear
drags, and theirs was as good as any I ever saw. -- Bob Rickard (AKA Dr. Spinnerbait) www.secretweaponlures.com --------------------------=x O'))) "go-bassn" wrote in message ... Do they still make rear drag spinning reels? Warren "Steve & Chris Clark" wrote in message ... Front or rear drag is all a mental thing. Using the anti reverse setting on a reel is required in both ways of adjusting the drag. Always set your drag lighter, if you can, then when the anti reverse does it thing the line won't take all the strain. You have to train your brain that there is only a perceived problem. "Obsessive compulsive disorder". Talk to it like a little kid and retrain it. Brain, it's OK that the drag is in the front, it's AUK that the drag is in the front ;-) Once the anti reverse is engaged both front and rear drags are exactly the same to adjust. The handle stops and it won't getcha. It's just that one is in the front and the brain's perception is your hand will get tangled in the line or interfere with it coming off of the spool. It's just the brain being stupid, is all. Well, mine, anyways ;-) Doesn't this make sense when you think about it? Front drag is the better drag, of the two, so over ride the brain and make it do what it doesn't want to do. The brain's an idiot. -- Stony "Bob Rickard" wrote in message ... Rear drags are a little easier to adjust while playing a fish, but front drags are far smoother and work better due to larger contact areas of the actual drag contact surfaces. -- Bob Rickard (AKA Dr. Spinnerbait) www.secretweaponlures.com --------------------------=x O'))) "Bucket Mouth" wrote in message ... I was looking at Shimano Spirex and Solstace. Anybody use either of these? They both come in front drag or rear drag. Not to sound too ignorant, but what is the difference between front and rear drag? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/04 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that you mention those Bob, I think My dad has a couple of those
squirreled away somewhere, you just gave me something to do! Thanks! -- Stony "Bob Rickard" wrote in message ... The old & renouned Zebco/Abu Cardinal series spinning reels all had rear drags, and theirs was as good as any I ever saw. -- Bob Rickard (AKA Dr. Spinnerbait) www.secretweaponlures.com --------------------------=x O'))) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/04 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shimano does still make rear drag for some of thier spinning reels.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
The old & renouned Zebco/Abu Cardinal series spinning reels all had rear drags, and theirs was as good as any I ever saw. I never could figure out what all the fuss was about those reels. They didn't feel particularly smooth to me. but then again, they didn't have a reversible handle and were not available with the crank on the right side, so I couldn't use one anyway. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No skirted spool, no instant anti-reverse, no silent anti reverse, no
big anti twist line roller. no bad for a 70's reel. no good fror 2004.JMO |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But using one on the water was a dream!
-- Bob Rickard (AKA Dr. Spinnerbait) www.secretweaponlures.com --------------------------=x O'))) "AJH" wrote in message ... No skirted spool, no instant anti-reverse, no silent anti reverse, no big anti twist line roller. no bad for a 70's reel. no good fror 2004.JMO |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yah, but if you come fishing with me on the wrong day with nightcrawlers:
"AJH" wrote in message ... No skirted spool, The skirted spool was a good idea back when to many fishing lines were much stiffer than today and would try to unwind themselves. I can remember when Trilene XL first hit the market, nobody wanted to believe that any fishing line could be that limp! And before that, we all thought that Trilene (Blue) and Royal Bonnyl (Brown) were limp lines. no instant anti-reverse, no silent anti reverse, no I own 3 reels of various makes, purchased within the last 4 years, that I have removed the anti-reverse from AND have cranked down the drag so tight that you have no recourse except that you have to back pedal when you get a biggun' on that wants to take off on you. big anti twist line roller. no bad for a 70's reel. no good fror 2004.JMO If you back pedal, then you cannot ever twist your line. What wants to cause line twist is the way line comes off the reel when the drag slips and the bail stays put, or even worse gets wound forward at the same time. FYI; I own 8 spinning reels that are as the designer/engineer wanted them, drag, anti-reverse and anti-twist rollers. They have their place for most fishing and will work wonders. Cast far Bob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() AJH wrote in message ... No skirted spool, no instant anti-reverse, no silent anti reverse, no big anti twist line roller. no bad for a 70's reel. no good fror 2004.JMO I have a model 3 and a 4. The non-skirted spools were never a problem. The non-silent anti-reverse is a major annoyance. The 3 is a terrible line-twister, while the 4 never gave me a line problem. Unfortunately, some of today's reels with the vaunted anti-twist line rollers have worse twist than some reels without an anti-twist feature. Other than the twist on the 3, the only problem using these Cardinals today is fishing with the anti-reverse disengaged; that backfires on me every once in a while. Nevertheless, I never quite understood why these reels had a cult-like following. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have one I inherited when my dad died. He was right handed but this is a
lefty spinning reel. Not only does the crank mount on either side, the bail spins the opposite direction of every other spinning reel I've seen, clockwise. When I got it the spool was empty so I took it over to Ray's and had them put some line on it and when I tried to use it the line was on backwards. It's a true lefty spinning reel by design. It's an Abu Cardinal and it's in killer shape, I don't know if it was ever really used but I can't fish with it. The bail thing drives me nuts, I don't know how you lefty's do it. Rich P "RichZ" wrote in message ... Bob wrote: The old & renouned Zebco/Abu Cardinal series spinning reels all had rear drags, and theirs was as good as any I ever saw. I never could figure out what all the fuss was about those reels. They didn't feel particularly smooth to me. but then again, they didn't have a reversible handle and were not available with the crank on the right side, so I couldn't use one anyway. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Loading new line onto spinning reel | Ian \(remove the antispam\) | General Discussion | 1 | June 22nd, 2004 12:52 AM |
Spinning rods hookset | Ken Blevins | Bass Fishing | 8 | May 24th, 2004 05:21 AM |
Can you help a newbie out with picking out his first spinning Reel/Rod combo? | DiggityDanks | General Discussion | 15 | April 2nd, 2004 05:55 AM |
Can you help a newbie out with picking out his first spinning Reel/Rod combo? | DiggityDanks | Bass Fishing | 17 | April 2nd, 2004 05:55 AM |
Smallmouth Jig/Tube Spinning Rod/Reel | Rich Pierro | Bass Fishing | 0 | September 24th, 2003 02:47 PM |