![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:20:54 GMT, "Larry L"
wrote: (snipped) I find it impossible to think of a 'right' reason for a aging couple with no children at home to build and occupy a several million dollar, sprawling but cheerless, "trophy" that feels more like a government office building, including a 3 story high 'dome' than a home. I can't think of one, either, but obviously the owners could and did. Maybe they'd had too small a space to live in comfortably for most of their life, particularly when they were children. Maybe they thought it was some sort of requirement of their social and / or economic class. Maybe they just liked lots and lots of pure space in some sort of exaggeration of the Scandinavian design principles. If they had an architect design it to their specs, they'd be as proud of it as you would of a good pup you'd bred and trained yourself. If they picked it from a number of already made up designs, it'd still be their personal choice and they'd have emotion invested in it as well as money. I think this would be all very much more important to the nouveau riche than to old money types. They can finally have dreams they'd never thought to achieve. And they want others to see and share them or at least admire them. I have trouble with the prairie palaces, too, but my own dreams of living space would be more based on what a house would look / be like if you took two to four double or triple wide trailers and joined them in an L or quadrangle space as a model. I, too, would have more space than anyone needs, but it'd be all on one level. Though given a choice between land space and housing space, I'd go for more land space around me every time. Personal choice / preference. Stairways are my big gripe about the newer architecture. Steps should be wide enough, even carpeted, that at least women (though I'd prefer it for men, too) be able to put a foot straight on the step and have the foot entirely on it without having to angle the foot or step just on the balls of the feet. I've seen some so narrow that they're going to be very hard for older folks (which all are apt to become with time and luck) to walk down carefully. And that's without any carpeting. Architects and builders want to show so much space in the rooms that they aren't willing to use it up for stairways. Ah, well, interior space is the fashion now. It'll change. It always does. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More on Leaders? | riverman | Fly Fishing | 1 | November 27th, 2004 08:29 PM |
DIY: Furled leaders | Conan the Librarian | Fly Fishing | 11 | September 30th, 2004 12:09 AM |
Question Regarding Leaders | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 2 | May 15th, 2004 01:52 PM |
Fluorocarbon and copolymer lines for sale...... | schreecher | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 13th, 2003 04:20 AM |
Fluorocarbon Leader / Tippet Material | schreecher | Fly Fishing | 5 | November 11th, 2003 06:49 AM |