![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you guys think a particular type of wing style works best. I like
divided calf for about all of my flies, because I can see it easier, but I wonder if its better to use a different style. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Better how, Ben?
If you can see 'em and the fishes take 'em ... Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Benjamin Turek" wrote in
news:vGgFf.1330$VX2.731@trndny04: Do you guys think a particular type of wing style works best. I like divided calf for about all of my flies, because I can see it easier, but I wonder if its better to use a different style. Depends on many things-- profile you're trying to achieve, how the fly is supposed to sit on the water, how long you want to spend tying a fly, materials on hand. For downwing midges, I like something like Z-wing. For many mayflies, I like a Usual, if I want the fly to sit low in the water. It's easy and has no hackle. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was just reading an article that was saying about different styles of
wings providing better profiles, that would make the fly appear more realistic. I was just wondering if there was really a difference to anything but us. The best fly fisher I personally know never ties wings at all, he just uses hackle and catches a ton fish. I was just curious if anyone had ever used a different wing style on the same pattern and noticed different (i.e. better) results with a particular style. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Benjamin Turek" wrote in message news:SQJFf.1579$VX2.1071@trndny04... I was just reading an article that was saying about different styles of wings providing better profiles, that would make the fly appear more realistic. I was just wondering if there was really a difference to anything but us. The best fly fisher I personally know never ties wings at all, he just uses hackle and catches a ton fish. I was just curious if anyone had ever used a different wing style on the same pattern and noticed different (i.e. better) results with a particular style. Not quite what you asked, but one thing that I have noticed is that feather wings, as in an Adams, will tangle your leader. The wings have some aerodynamics, and unless they are ungodly perfect, the fly will spin as you false cast and within a few casts your leader will be all twisted. For that reason alone, I'm abandoning feather wings. The main purpose of hair wings, afaik, is to make the fly easier to spot in the water. I'm not at all sure the fish really cares. --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Benjamin Turek" wrote in
news:SQJFf.1579$VX2.1071@trndny04: I was just reading an article that was saying about different styles of wings providing better profiles, that would make the fly appear more realistic. I was just wondering if there was really a difference to anything but us. The best fly fisher I personally know never ties wings at all, he just uses hackle and catches a ton fish. I was just curious if anyone had ever used a different wing style on the same pattern and noticed different (i.e. better) results with a particular style. I'm a big believer in the idea that if something is easier to omit, yet the practice persists for decades anyway, that there's a reason to include it. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Seidman wrote:
I'm a big believer in the idea that if something is easier to omit, yet the practice persists for decades anyway, that there's a reason to include it. So I take it that you believe in god, heaven, hell, angels, Satan, etc. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw wrote in
nk.net: Scott Seidman wrote: I'm a big believer in the idea that if something is easier to omit, yet the practice persists for decades anyway, that there's a reason to include it. So I take it that you believe in god, heaven, hell, angels, Satan, etc. Well, I stand corrected. Let me specify that my earlier statement reflects my views on flies and tying materials. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hair Wings, double/single wings (Lee Wulff said the Grey, Royal etc.
worked just as well with a single upright wing) I've used them both: the double seemed to cock the fly better for me, but fish didn't seem to mind. Also used hackle tip wings in place of calf in Wulffs (and vice versa in some other patterns) and can't recall a fish getting snotty about them. The calftail were easier to see though. There is a school of thought that a conventional hackle is also representative of a wing. Steve Steve |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another cause of that twisting can be overhackling.
Even harwings, overhackled, will also result in a mangled tess. (going up a tippett size or to stiffer material can help if you get caught short on flys) Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
compiling a comprehensive link collection | sandy | Fly Fishing Tying | 15 | August 17th, 2005 11:50 PM |
Dallas Tx, Fly Fishers Auction April 23rd | No left turn | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 22nd, 2005 12:16 AM |
Possible helpful hint on tying bullethead style flies | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing | 0 | April 27th, 2004 02:33 PM |
Possible helpful hint on tying bullethead style flies | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | April 27th, 2004 02:33 PM |
FS my collection of fly tying books | Jack-of-the-Dust | Fly Fishing Tying | 0 | April 8th, 2004 10:19 PM |