![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, which he has proven he's not. Bingo. The problem is that Rove, Bush's brain, has so far succeeded in selling the notion that you are by definition a conservative if and only if you support Bush. Can I assume that you, as a conservative, no longer approve of Bush? I respect true conservative principles, but this administration mob has no principles. They're a pack of crooks and liars, politically opportunistic to their core. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rw typed:
Tim J. wrote: You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, which he has proven he's not. Bingo. The problem is that Rove, Bush's brain, has so far succeeded in selling the notion that you are by definition a conservative if and only if you support Bush. Can I assume that you, as a conservative, no longer approve of Bush? You can assume whatever you wish. There are many matters on which Mr. Bush and I disagree. However, given the same two choices again, and having lived in the state of Mass. with Mr. Kerry for several years, I'd vote the same way again. I respect true conservative principles, Yeah, riiiiiiigggghhhht. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:08:36 -0500, "Tim J."
wrote: rw typed: Tim J. wrote: You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, which he has proven he's not. Bingo. The problem is that Rove, Bush's brain, has so far succeeded in selling the notion that you are by definition a conservative if and only if you support Bush. Can I assume that you, as a conservative, no longer approve of Bush? You can assume whatever you wish. There are many matters on which Mr. Bush and I disagree. However, given the same two choices again, and having lived in the state of Mass. with Mr. Kerry for several years, I'd vote the same way again. I respect true conservative principles, Yeah, riiiiiiigggghhhht. Couldn't have said it better, Tim. Scarey Kerry shouldn't be in public office PERIOD. And Barnard respects only those people who support HIS idealogy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim J." wrote You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, Actually, no. I think I'm far more conservative than Bush in many areas, especially fiscal responsibility. BUT, Bush/Rove do have the adman repeat the mantra style down and that is what I cited when using the phrase "Bush-like" Sidenote: I often wonder what 'conservative' now means ... I live within my budget, ( my only debt is what remains on my mortgage ). If I want something I can't afford I look for ways to make the money BEFORE I buy. If I must buy something I can't afford ( emergency ) I instantly look for ways to increase my income, maybe go back to work. I am 'liberal.' Most of the people that I deal with are younger than me, Yuppies or 'old money,' Republican voters and call themselves 'conservative.' A tremendously high percentage are in debt up past their ears, measure their own worth ONLY by what they own ( it's the only thing they ever mention about themselves, so I'm forced to think it is their only self measure), think deficit and debt doesn't really matter, show ZERO real interest in what the world will be like after they are gone and want to use up as much as they possibly can while here. They are 'conservatives' ..... just what is you guys 'conserve'?? G Yeah, once he's told what to believe. ;-) Possibly true, humans are all subject to human nature. But, at least at the level of social issues, I'd bet 15 to one on most 'liberals' at least trying to listen to the views of others over most 'social conservatives' But, this roffian zoo shows that few on either side listen past hearing something they think they can argue with ... I point that out because it really is on the same thread as 'sound bite culture' ... communication, the act of honestly trying to share and understand other's ideas, even if the belief in them is not shared, is dying fast over all our culture. I think this is largely because of TV and it's effect on HOW we think, not what we think....i.e. sound bite grab em in 10 seconds cause that is all they can handle, thinking. Talk about yer oversimplification! Hoo boy. -- Again my point was about the effect of 'admen' and 'sound bite culture' on political outcomes .... I don't get the impression that is what you are responding to G As an experiment, in your own mind, try to formulate 'sound bite' messages for both sides of one issue ... stem sell research using the little 4 cell 'embryos' produced as part of some infertility treatments. Note how easy ( regardless of your true belief, that is NOT the subject, sound bite advertizing is the subject ) it is to conjure up a few words and 'inspiring' images to support the side that believes those four cells are 'a human.' Note how difficult it is to present a QUICK argument for research of unknown outcome, demanding a degree of ethical care, but in the long term very likely producing great improvements for humans that have actually grown past 4 cells and have brains and families and friends and are more than just DNA, are actually humans i.e. self aware social animals. Again, MY issue here is not the stem cell issue, itself, rather the suitablity of the various 'sides' for adman tactics in our culture. Bush is Pres not because of his actual personal quality. Rather an adman found him and made him the neocon product spokesman. That is my point, and I believe I'm right ... I will try to listen to opposite opinions, but admit that I already have thought about this a lot and believe that Bush was choosen BECAUSE he was a very common person, not too bright, easy to manipulate, eager to be a 'true believer,' had lots of money, a 'good family political name' and just the right amount of 'good looks' ..enough to present well on TV but not so much as to leave Clyde in Tulsa feeling inferior. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote and just the right amount of 'good looks' ..enough to present well on TV but not so much as to leave Clyde in Tulsa feeling inferior. actually, i have a man crush on him; i think he is gorgeous. yfitons wayno(and don't even get me *started* on that sex kitten he's married to!) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Harrison typed:
"Larry L" wrote and just the right amount of 'good looks' ..enough to present well on TV but not so much as to leave Clyde in Tulsa feeling inferior. actually, i have a man crush on him; i think he is gorgeous. Does this post refer to Louie? yfitons wayno(and don't even get me *started* on that sex kitten he's married to!) Never mind. That answers the question. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L typed:
"Tim J." wrote You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, Actually, no. I think I'm far more conservative than Bush in many areas, especially fiscal responsibility. BUT, Bush/Rove do have the adman repeat the mantra style down and that is what I cited when using the phrase "Bush-like" So "Republican culture of corruption" is a Bush-like mantra, right? -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim J." wrote So "Republican culture of corruption" is a Bush-like mantra, right? -- Yes it is, and, frankly, I'm upset with several things I see in the DemCamp including trying to use tactics the Republicans have mastered without having the mastery. BoZo the Dem party chairman was a huge mistake, imho, as the ONLY thing he knows is negativity. I'd love to find a candidate I can vote FOR, and I've said before on ROFF he does NOT have to be a Democrat. That said, I think the last 5 years have harmed my country more than any similar period in nearly half a century, and I blame the people pulling Bush's strings. I'm not anti-Republican .... but I admit 'you guys" are making it difficult to stay that way ... I HAAVE voted for Republican, probably will again. I saw somebody, a Rep that was the minister at Regan's funeral I think they said, last night talking about the grave dangers we all face as a Nation, because of Rove/et al seeing the demographic value of being 'faithful' .... he said lots of things I agreed with, none I'd fight in a 'let's compromise' environment, many of them 'anti this admin, but pro this country "... all from a Republican's point of view. Let's face it, Tim, .... I admit that the Dems have a BoZO chairman ... can you fess up to the fact that MOST republicans are voting party line far more than what's really right? Come on, you know it's true, don't ya? Heah, here's another one from an interview on PBS a few days back ... it was in my deleted files from one of the many many posts I write but never post. On potential damages that could result from the inquiry into the NSA surveillance, to that surveillance and to the nation, I present a Republican :-) "SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: All I can tell you is that the ultimate damage that I want to avoid is a constitutional damage in terms of checks and balances. I want to fight this enemy. I want to make sure our president and our military surveils the enemy. I want to know if American citizens are collaborating with the enemy. We can do that. We must do that. But the biggest thing that can happen, to me, as a nation is that in the process of fighting the enemy, we give up the processes that makes us free. I think there is plenty of room for surveiling the enemy and providing protections to American citizens who may be caught up in a network of conversations. So there's a lot of harm that can come. There's two harms: Letting the enemy know what we're doing. We need to make sure we don't do any more of that than we have to. The other harm, equally important to me, is that we destroy a constitutional balance that's worked for 200 years. " Larry says, "Amen, Bro" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim J. wrote:
So "Republican culture of corruption" is a Bush-like mantra, right? Chaney was hunting illegally. He didn't have the required upland game bird permit. Are you happy about voting for a poacher? In the grand scheme of things, considering the mind-boggling, scandalous illegality this administration is involved in, I guess not having the required hunting tag doesn't rank very high. But it's indicative of the sense of privilege and the basic incompetence of this crew. No doubt Cheney will blame his lack of a tag on some pathetic, low level member of his staff. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry L" wrote in message ... "Tim J." wrote You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative, Actually, no. I think I'm far more conservative than Bush in many areas, especially fiscal responsibility. BUT, Bush/Rove do have the adman repeat the mantra style down and that is what I cited when using the phrase "Bush-like" Sidenote: I often wonder what 'conservative' now means ... I live within my budget, ( my only debt is what remains on my mortgage ). If I want something I can't afford I look for ways to make the money BEFORE I buy. If I must buy something I can't afford ( emergency ) I instantly look for ways to increase my income, maybe go back to work. I am 'liberal.' Most of the people that I deal with are younger than me, Yuppies or 'old money,' Republican voters and call themselves 'conservative.' A tremendously high percentage are in debt up past their ears, measure their own worth ONLY by what they own ( it's the only thing they ever mention about themselves, so I'm forced to think it is their only self measure), think deficit and debt doesn't really matter, show ZERO real interest in what the world will be like after they are gone and want to use up as much as they possibly can while here. They are 'conservatives' ..... just what is you guys 'conserve'?? G Yeah, once he's told what to believe. ;-) Possibly true, humans are all subject to human nature. But, at least at the level of social issues, I'd bet 15 to one on most 'liberals' at least trying to listen to the views of others over most 'social conservatives' But, this roffian zoo shows that few on either side listen past hearing something they think they can argue with ... I point that out because it really is on the same thread as 'sound bite culture' ... communication, the act of honestly trying to share and understand other's ideas, even if the belief in them is not shared, is dying fast over all our culture. I think this is largely because of TV and it's effect on HOW we think, not what we think....i.e. sound bite grab em in 10 seconds cause that is all they can handle, thinking. Talk about yer oversimplification! Hoo boy. -- Again my point was about the effect of 'admen' and 'sound bite culture' on political outcomes .... I don't get the impression that is what you are responding to G As an experiment, in your own mind, try to formulate 'sound bite' messages for both sides of one issue ... stem sell research using the little 4 cell 'embryos' produced as part of some infertility treatments. Note how easy ( regardless of your true belief, that is NOT the subject, sound bite advertizing is the subject ) it is to conjure up a few words and 'inspiring' images to support the side that believes those four cells are 'a human.' Note how difficult it is to present a QUICK argument for research of unknown outcome, demanding a degree of ethical care, but in the long term very likely producing great improvements for humans that have actually grown past 4 cells and have brains and families and friends and are more than just DNA, are actually humans i.e. self aware social animals. Again, MY issue here is not the stem cell issue, itself, rather the suitablity of the various 'sides' for adman tactics in our culture. Bush is Pres not because of his actual personal quality. Rather an adman found him and made him the neocon product spokesman. That is my point, and I believe I'm right ... I will try to listen to opposite opinions, but admit that I already have thought about this a lot and believe that Bush was choosen BECAUSE he was a very common person, not too bright, easy to manipulate, eager to be a 'true believer,' had lots of money, a 'good family political name' and just the right amount of 'good looks' ..enough to present well on TV but not so much as to leave Clyde in Tulsa feeling inferior. And all this from the man who wonders about others' balls, wants to sue and arrest the neighbors, club, shoot, or otherwise destroy their dogs, insults them to their faces.....or when their backs are turned.....etc., etc. Yeah, we'll pay close attention to this little sermon. Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAKE THOUSANDS, NOT KIDDING | Eagleint25 | Bass Fishing | 0 | June 28th, 2004 12:54 AM |
Call for an Impeachment Inquiry of Bush and Cheney | Messing In Boats | Saltwater Fishing | 0 | April 18th, 2004 12:45 AM |
Rolling Stone - Bush is worst environmental president ever | Sportsmen Against Bush | Fly Fishing | 0 | December 4th, 2003 09:02 AM |
Cheney stifles Energy Bill probe | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 1 | November 19th, 2003 01:44 PM |