A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cheney shoots someone (I'm not kidding)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 14th, 2006, 12:41 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cheney shoots someone (I'm not kidding)


"Larry L" wrote in message
...

"Tim J." wrote



You're, of course, assuming that Bush IS a conservative,


Actually, no. I think I'm far more conservative than Bush in many
areas, especially fiscal responsibility. BUT, Bush/Rove do have the
adman repeat the mantra style down and that is what I cited when using the
phrase "Bush-like"

Sidenote:
I often wonder what 'conservative' now means ... I live within my budget,
( my only debt is what remains on my mortgage ). If I want something I
can't afford I look for ways to make the money BEFORE I buy. If I must
buy something I can't afford ( emergency ) I instantly look for ways to
increase my income, maybe go back to work. I am 'liberal.'

Most of the people that I deal with are younger than me, Yuppies or 'old
money,' Republican voters and call themselves 'conservative.' A
tremendously high percentage are in debt up past their ears, measure their
own worth ONLY by what they own ( it's the only thing they ever mention
about themselves, so I'm forced to think it is their only self measure),
think deficit and debt doesn't really matter, show ZERO real interest in
what the world will be like after they are gone and want to use up as much
as they possibly can while here. They are 'conservatives' ..... just
what is you guys 'conserve'?? G


Yeah, once he's told what to believe. ;-)


Possibly true, humans are all subject to human nature. But, at least at
the level of social issues, I'd bet 15 to one on most 'liberals' at least
trying to listen to the views of others over most 'social conservatives'
But, this roffian zoo shows that few on either side listen past hearing
something they think they can argue with ... I point that out because it
really is on the same thread as 'sound bite culture' ... communication,
the act of honestly trying to share and understand other's ideas, even if
the belief in them is not shared, is dying fast over all our culture. I
think this is largely because of TV and it's effect on HOW we think, not
what we think....i.e. sound bite grab em in 10 seconds cause that is all
they can handle, thinking.




Talk about yer oversimplification! Hoo boy.
--


Again my point was about the effect of 'admen' and 'sound bite culture' on
political outcomes .... I don't get the impression that is what you are
responding to G As an experiment, in your own mind, try to formulate
'sound bite' messages for both sides of one issue ... stem sell research
using the little 4 cell 'embryos' produced as part of some infertility
treatments. Note how easy ( regardless of your true belief, that is NOT
the subject, sound bite advertizing is the subject ) it is to conjure up a
few words and 'inspiring' images to support the side that believes those
four cells are 'a human.' Note how difficult it is to present a QUICK
argument for research of unknown outcome, demanding a degree of ethical
care, but in the long term very likely producing great improvements for
humans that have actually grown past 4 cells and have brains and families
and friends and are more than just DNA, are actually humans i.e. self
aware social animals.

Again, MY issue here is not the stem cell issue, itself, rather the
suitablity of the various 'sides' for adman tactics in our culture.

Bush is Pres not because of his actual personal quality. Rather an adman
found him and made him the neocon product spokesman. That is my point,
and I believe I'm right ... I will try to listen to opposite opinions, but
admit that I already have thought about this a lot and believe that Bush
was choosen BECAUSE he was a very common person, not too bright, easy to
manipulate, eager to be a 'true believer,' had lots of money, a 'good
family political name' and just the right amount of 'good looks' ..enough
to present well on TV but not so much as to leave Clyde in Tulsa feeling
inferior.


And all this from the man who wonders about others' balls, wants to sue and
arrest the neighbors, club, shoot, or otherwise destroy their dogs, insults
them to their faces.....or when their backs are turned.....etc., etc. Yeah,
we'll pay close attention to this little sermon.

Wolfgang


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MAKE THOUSANDS, NOT KIDDING Eagleint25 Bass Fishing 0 June 28th, 2004 12:54 AM
Call for an Impeachment Inquiry of Bush and Cheney Messing In Boats Saltwater Fishing 0 April 18th, 2004 12:45 AM
Rolling Stone - Bush is worst environmental president ever Sportsmen Against Bush Fly Fishing 0 December 4th, 2003 09:02 AM
Cheney stifles Energy Bill probe [email protected] Fly Fishing 1 November 19th, 2003 01:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.