Cheney shoots someone (I'm not kidding)

On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:12:23 -0500, "Tim J."
wrote:

As roff's self-appointed bookie, I'm laying twelve to one odds on the
outcome of this discussion. Anyone wishing to place their bets as to the
exact time of the event can contact my agent, Li'l wayno's House of Book (we
never close).

Uh, are you assuming I will apologize to Wolfgang and Barnard?

Don't take any bets in that direction. You'll lose.

d;o)

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:12:23 -0500, "Tim J."
wrote:


As roff's self-appointed bookie, I'm laying twelve to one odds on the
outcome of this discussion. Anyone wishing to place their bets as to the
exact time of the event can contact my agent, Li'l wayno's House of Book (we
never close).


Uh, are you assuming I will apologize to Wolfgang and Barnard?

You've been there and done that.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:25:05 GMT, rw
wrote:

You've been there and done that.

An apology is not an apology unless it is accepted. You didn't accept
it. I don't believe I have ever apologized to Wolfgang, or will.

d;o)

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:25:05 GMT, rw
wrote:

You've been there and done that.

An apology is not an apology unless it is accepted.

Well, that's just plain stupid.

You didn't accept it.

Hm......maybe a SINCERE apology would do the trick? Oh well, just one of
those many things that will forever remain a mystery.

I don't believe I have ever apologized to Wolfgang, or will.

Yeah, but as you've often demonstrated, what you believe runs the gamut from
just plain stupid through bizarre and all the way to demented.

Anyway, what if I said "pretty please with sugar on it!".....would that
change your mi....um.....would that make a difference?

Wolfgang

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:47:09 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:

maybe a SINCERE apology would do the trick

I was sincere when I apologized to Barnard, just like I was sincere
when I made up with George Gehrke. But Barnard doesn't accept
apologies.

I owe YOU no apology.

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
news
I owe YOU no apology.

Hm......

O.k.

How about a doughnut?

Wolfgang
well, hell, everybody else gets an apology......I should get SOMETHING!

Wolfgang wrote:
Wolfgang
well, hell, everybody else gets an apology......I should get SOMETHING!


How about a munchkin? Do you have Dunkin' Donuts in those flyover states?

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:47:09 -0600, "Wolfgang"
wrote:


maybe a SINCERE apology would do the trick


I was sincere when I apologized to Barnard, just like I was sincere
when I made up with George Gehrke. But Barnard doesn't accept
apologies.

Not correct. I stop accepting them after the third one for the same
offense. After that, I figure that they aren't sincere.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:17:56 GMT, rw
wrote:

Not correct. I stop accepting them after the third one for the same
offense. After that, I figure that they aren't sincere.

You never accepted one. And I really did feel bad about calling you a
putz. But not anymore.

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:12:23 -0500, "Tim J."
wrote:

As roff's self-appointed bookie, I'm laying twelve to one odds on the
outcome of this discussion. Anyone wishing to place their bets as to
the exact time of the event can contact my agent, Li'l wayno's House
of Book (we never close).

Uh, are you assuming I will apologize to Wolfgang and Barnard?

Why would you think that?
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/