Sick of the license BS

"Ken C" wrote in message
...

I took my chances. After
all, I have never been approached for a license check in 40 years of
fishing.

The enforcement in some states is not what it could be because DNR's are
ofthen not funded at a level which allows for enough officers. Just because
because you haven't been checked does not make it legal anymore than driving
85 in a 70 mph zone makes it legal because no one has pulled you over.

I don't need to buy a non-resident driving license as I travel around
this country and I shouldn't have to buy a local fishing license
either. A resident season license in any state should suffice.

If fishing licenses (and hunting) didn't often go to support wildlife
programs and wildlife enforcement in various states you could have a point.
but it is the law and you should do what it requires. Maybe if everyone acts
the way you claim to, then go one, at some point there won;t be money in the
coffers to protect that trout stream you've decided you can poach on.

I hope when you do get caught it's one of those states that requires a
non-resident to post a cash bail on the spot or go to the local jail,

I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.

On 14 May 2006 09:24:38 -0700, "George Adams"
wrote:
I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.

The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

Ken C wrote:
On 14 May 2006 09:24:38 -0700, "George Adams"
wrote:

I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.


The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The same or similar could be said for cheating on your taxes.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

I agree that many rules are stupid and unreasonable, and that I break
some of them routinely, but fishing without a license doesn't sound to
me like an enjoyable way to spend time.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"Ken C" wrote in message
...
On 14 May 2006 09:24:38 -0700, "George Adams"
wrote:
I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.

The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The same can be said for other forms of petty theft. I guess one takes
pride where one finds it.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Well, that's "A" point. There are others. For example, you're a pathetic
piece of ****. The difference, of course, is that the latter is a GOOD
point.

Wolfgang
another kennie......and this one wants to talk about breeding......hee, hee,
hee.

"Ken C" wrote in message
...
On 14 May 2006 09:24:38 -0700, "George Adams"
wrote:
I hope it's a state that confiscates all the equipment that the poacher
used, including his vehicle. Although that penalty is usually only
enforced for big game violations.

The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

Your time here on ROFF will be very short, so I wonder why you even bothered
to troll this moronic line?

Happy pochin', ****head.

Op

"Mr. Opus McDopus" wrote in message
. ..
The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

It just occurred to me. What with companies, universities and what not
doing Google searches now a dayz, it's just a matter of time before judges
are doin' the same from the bench.

I can just see 'ol Kennie Poo explainin' to his Honor that it was just a
matter of ignorance that, he (Kennie Poo Poacher)-- the epitome of the legal
citizen--neglected to purchase the proper huntin'/fishin' license. So the
good judge, an avid hunter and fisher himself, decides to check into 'ol
Kennie Poo's past. For heaven's sake, what's this thing called ROFF?

Op --lookin' forward to the sentencing phase of the trial--

On Sun, 14 May 2006 19:36:05 -0400, "Mr. Opus McDopus"
wrote:


"Mr. Opus McDopus" wrote in message
...
The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

It just occurred to me. What with companies, universities and what not
doing Google searches now a dayz, it's just a matter of time before judges
are doin' the same from the bench.

I can just see 'ol Kennie Poo explainin' to his Honor that it was just a
matter of ignorance that, he (Kennie Poo Poacher)-- the epitome of the legal
citizen--neglected to purchase the proper huntin'/fishin' license. So the
good judge, an avid hunter and fisher himself, decides to check into 'ol
Kennie Poo's past. For heaven's sake, what's this thing called ROFF?

Op --lookin' forward to the sentencing phase of the trial--

Maybe that court will take judicial notice of all that full faith and
credit nonsense somewhere around Article 4 of the US Constitution
(pointed out for those unfamiliar...like "liberals" or Nader
voters...)...then again, maybe not...maybe you'll learn something apart
from Foxfire U's, um, high standards of matriculation...then again,
maybe not...IAC, there ya are...

The OP had point (regardless of the OP actually knowing that he did),
and not one that deserved dismissal as casually as it has been thus
far...

Not really giving a **** if this helps,
R

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 May 2006 19:36:05 -0400, "Mr. Opus McDopus"
wrote:


"Mr. Opus McDopus" wrote in message
t...
The typical fine is $150, so it doesn't take too long until you are
way ahead of the game.

The point is, the rules are stupid and unreasonable. Only a product of
inbreeding follows every rule.

Ken C

It just occurred to me. What with companies, universities and what not
doing Google searches now a dayz, it's just a matter of time before judges
are doin' the same from the bench.

I can just see 'ol Kennie Poo explainin' to his Honor that it was just a
matter of ignorance that, he (Kennie Poo Poacher)-- the epitome of the
legal
citizen--neglected to purchase the proper huntin'/fishin' license. So the
good judge, an avid hunter and fisher himself, decides to check into 'ol
Kennie Poo's past. For heaven's sake, what's this thing called ROFF?

Op --lookin' forward to the sentencing phase of the trial--

Maybe that court will take judicial notice of all that full faith and
credit nonsense somewhere around Article 4 of the US Constitution
(pointed out for those unfamiliar...like "liberals" or Nader
voters...)...then again, maybe not...maybe you'll learn something apart
from Foxfire U's, um, high standards of matriculation...then again,
maybe not...IAC, there ya are...

The OP had point (regardless of the OP actually knowing that he did),
and not one that deserved dismissal as casually as it has been thus
far...

I sweartagod I got the greatest imagination in the world. No, really!
Somehow (unbidden) the thought came into my head that you once said you
studied law somewhere at some time. DAMN, I crack me up!

Not really giving a **** if this helps,

A bit of lowbrow humor is never a bad start for a Monday morning.

Wolfgang

wrote:
...
The OP had point (regardless of the OP actually knowing that he did),
and not one that deserved dismissal as casually as it has been thus
far...

Oh bull****, the original poster is a jackass and a poacher,
*that's* the point. But you're right about not dismissing his
troll casually, his troll deserves massive flames and vicious
personal insults.

--
Ken Fortenberry