![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Skirvin" wrote in message u... "Wolfgang" writes: Seems to me that all this fuss is generated by a misguided allegiance to the notion that naming conventions in Usenet should adhere to some sort of hierarchical model inspired by Linnaean taxonomy. An interesting enough game for anyone who wants to play, but ultimately unworkable. Nevertheless, that's how the system works. Each newsgroup gets a name, and it goes into an existing hierarchical namespace; Well, see, there's the problem. That is NOT how the system works. The trouble is that there is no hierarchical structure to the things that people want to talk about. To be sure, some categories of things are naturally subsumed in broader, more encompassing categroies......thus fly fishing is a subset of fishing, which is itself one of many outdoor activities. But this is by no means the case with every human construct, be it a thing, an activity, a place, an idea, or whatever. Take barbed wire, for instance......where does that fit? The most that can be done is the imposition of a caricature of a hierarchical taxonomic structure....and that is precisely what has been done. And now people get to display their wit in attempts to rationalize trying to fit a square peg into a hole that doesn't exist. One shouldn't need to point out that the shape of the nonexistent hole is somewhere on the wrong side of line marking irrelevance. choose your name as best you can, Sound advice. What a wonderful world it would be if someone had thought of that before, ainna? and expect some discussion of it as you set the group up. Assuming your keen perception that the painfully obvious needs to be pointed out to those who are likely to participate in the discussion is correct (and who could doubt it?) then something passing for discussion would appear to be inevitable, whether expected or not. And so, here we are. Discussion CAN be useful but when it is applied to questions along the lines of how many angels can dance on a pinhead, its utility is pretty much limited to cheap amusement. Mind you, that's o.k. with me....I like a good laugh as well as anyone. I got interested in this discussion because it was crossposted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly which is where I usually hang out. I mention this because it provides a wonderful example of a fortuitous name......it lends itself quite naturally to an easily prounceable and memorable acronym.....roff (often written in all caps but, oddly for a proper noun, only rarely with just the initial letter capitalized). Now THERE'S an excellent justification for a name!.....and, not so incidentally, also a fine example of fodder for useful discussion. This process pre-dates me by a long-shot, So do clowns. Are you somebody I should know? and I don't expect that it will die for as long as Usenet survives. Well, expectation is easy. Anybody can do that. - Tim Skirvin ) Chair, Big-8 Management Board What's a "Big-8"? Wolfgang |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:59:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote in
: ... What's a "Big-8"? A set of 8 newsgroup hierarchies all under one management (currently news.announce.newgroups mods, potentially the Big-8 Management Board). http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=history:big-8 rec.* is one of the eight hierarchies in the big-8. Marty |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote in message ... On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:59:06 -0500, "Wolfgang" wrote in : ... What's a "Big-8"? A set of 8 newsgroup hierarchies all under one management (currently news.announce.newgroups mods, potentially the Big-8 Management Board). http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=history:big-8 rec.* is one of the eight hierarchies in the big-8. Marty Thanks, Marty. That's about what I figured. Interesting stuff.....particularly this part: " ... The most significant part of the name is given first. The first component of the name is special and more significant than the rest of the name, since it defines the top-level Usenet hierarchy to which that group belongs" It comes as no surprise that "management" would find this true......though I be go ta hell if I can think of a good reason that they should. To the end user (and what, after all, is a newsgroup for?) precisely the opposite should be true. I'm a fly fisher.....makes no difference to me how some drudge wants to label and file the wing, the structure, the street address, the city, the county, the state, the nation and the planet to which I go to play. All I need is the room number. By the way, "SJ"? Does that mean what any literate person would presumably assume it does? Wolfgang |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Wolfgang" wrote:
[...] By the way, "SJ"? Does that mean what any literate person would presumably assume it does? Wolfgang Depends on your definition of literate. IIRC, it stands for Society of Jesuits (although it's probably really Latin, eh, Martin?). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Bostwick" wrote in message ... In article , "Wolfgang" wrote: [...] By the way, "SJ"? Does that mean what any literate person would presumably assume it does? Wolfgang Depends on your definition of literate. IIRC, it stands for Society of Jesuits (although it's probably really Latin, eh, Martin?). I don't think you fit my definition. Wolfgang would anyone like to tell the boy what it really means? ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wolfgang" writes:
would anyone like to tell the boy what it really means? ![]() Is it one of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SJ -Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote: On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:14:06 GMT, (David Bostwick) wrote in : By the way, "SJ"? Does that mean what any literate person would presumably assume it does? Depends on your definition of literate. IIRC, it stands for Society of Jesuits (although it's probably really Latin, eh, Martin?). "SJ" is English--"Society of Jesus.". Latin had no letter "J," so it would be "Societas Iesu" (SI). Italian: La Compagnia di Gesł. And so on ... "Jesuit" is derived from the Latin "Iesu ita," which means "like Jesus." A lot of folks think that we're not too Jesus-like. Some went to their Bibles and found the Jebusites, a tribe inimical to the house of Israel, and used that word instead. And that's why you might also hear us called "Jebs" or "Jebbies." [To the proponent and folks interested in fishing: sorry for the thread drift.] Marty I almost got it from the "X". The only people I have ever known with the middle name Xavier were clerics of some sort. cheers oz, Creighton Prep, '57 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 May 2006 21:02:05 -0700, "MajorOz" wrote in
.com: ... "SJ" is English--"Society of Jesus." ... [To the proponent and folks interested in fishing: sorry for the thread drift.] ... I almost got it from the "X". The only people I have ever known with the middle name Xavier were clerics of some sort. After my Dad died this spring, Mom told me that they chose my name when they were dating. I was the second child in the family, so the choice of name wasn't motivated by immediate need. ![]() I have met lots of FX's in the Society. My great-uncle Ignatius wanted to be a Jesuit, but they turned him down. oz, Creighton Prep, '57 I did Tertianship down the hill from Creighton U in 1992-93. Nice town. [Tiny nod to the rofb folks:] AH! I fish for bass in my family's pond in Little Valley, NY. There are some bluegills in the pond, too. Someday I'm gonna get a bag of crayfish and see if they'll provide more feed for the bass. The biggest bass we ever caught in the pond was 16". I have his outline on a piece of 2x6" wood. I'm sorry that I let the kid who caught him cook him. Haven't hooked one that big again. ![]() Marty |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|