![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 24 Jun 2006 18:20:20 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote: SNIP What's interesting is that dim as some folks here are, there is no reason to suppose that any of them are so abysmally stupid as to be unable to deal with this simple equation......or it's implications. Or, am I being way too generous here? Everybody who fails to understand what happens to a fire when you cut off the fuel supply step right up and be counted. Wolfgang who, if he is evil, must be human......so sayeth the high priest of violent death. Your analogy, as stated, would be correct. However, as with most people who are trying to prove an invalid point, you have ignored the truth of the situation. As any Californians/westerners can attest, even when you cut off the fuel, a fire can "jump" and start again. The fire, (fundamental Islamic terrorism), will always seek out fresh fuels. And I believe 9/11 occurred before we were in Iraq and Afghanistan "providing fuel"? The "fire" in this case has a basic hatred for all things related to western society and has categorically stated their goal to be the destruction of our civilization. So the only way to remove the fuel would be??? You can try to make things simple, ( I know it's a necessity for you), but this is far from a simple subject. The proof will be in the pudding so to speak. I have no doubt we will have a democratic president after the next election. That president will more or less withdraw from the current conflicts. According to your premise all terrorism should stop at that point. We'll see. As for your insulting remarks at Dave's loss? Nothing........I just can't find the right words. -- Ric Hamel A misplaced Alaskan lost in ConUS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Alaskan420 wrote: "Wolfgang" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 24 Jun 2006 18:20:20 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote: SNIP What's interesting is that dim as some folks here are, there is no reason to suppose that any of them are so abysmally stupid as to be unable to deal with this simple equation......or it's implications. Or, am I being way too generous here? Everybody who fails to understand what happens to a fire when you cut off the fuel supply step right up and be counted. Wolfgang who, if he is evil, must be human......so sayeth the high priest of violent death. Your analogy, as stated, would be correct. However, as with most people who are trying to prove an invalid point, you have ignored the truth of the situation. As any Californians/westerners can attest, even when you cut off the fuel, a fire can "jump" and start again. The fire, (fundamental Islamic terrorism), will always seek out fresh fuels. And I believe 9/11 occurred before we were in Iraq and Afghanistan "providing fuel"? The "fire" in this case has a basic hatred for all things related to western society and has categorically stated their goal to be the destruction of our civilization. So the only way to remove the fuel would be??? You can try to make things simple, ( I know it's a necessity for you), but this is far from a simple subject. The proof will be in the pudding so to speak. I have no doubt we will have a democratic president after the next election. That president will more or less withdraw from the current conflicts. According to your premise all terrorism should stop at that point. We'll see. As for your insulting remarks at Dave's loss? Nothing........I just can't find the right words. Even for Usenet, you are colossal dumbass. And I'm sure it will come as no surprise to anyone who has known you as long as we have that finding the right words is a herculean task for you under the most auspicious of circumstances. Wolfgang |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wolfgang" wrote in message oups.com... Alaskan420 wrote: "Wolfgang" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 24 Jun 2006 18:20:20 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote: SNIP What's interesting is that dim as some folks here are, there is no reason to suppose that any of them are so abysmally stupid as to be unable to deal with this simple equation......or it's implications. Or, am I being way too generous here? Everybody who fails to understand what happens to a fire when you cut off the fuel supply step right up and be counted. Wolfgang who, if he is evil, must be human......so sayeth the high priest of violent death. Your analogy, as stated, would be correct. However, as with most people who are trying to prove an invalid point, you have ignored the truth of the situation. As any Californians/westerners can attest, even when you cut off the fuel, a fire can "jump" and start again. The fire, (fundamental Islamic terrorism), will always seek out fresh fuels. And I believe 9/11 occurred before we were in Iraq and Afghanistan "providing fuel"? The "fire" in this case has a basic hatred for all things related to western society and has categorically stated their goal to be the destruction of our civilization. So the only way to remove the fuel would be??? You can try to make things simple, ( I know it's a necessity for you), but this is far from a simple subject. The proof will be in the pudding so to speak. I have no doubt we will have a democratic president after the next election. That president will more or less withdraw from the current conflicts. According to your premise all terrorism should stop at that point. We'll see. As for your insulting remarks at Dave's loss? Nothing........I just can't find the right words. Even for Usenet, you are colossal dumbass. And I'm sure it will come as no surprise to anyone who has known you as long as we have that finding the right words is a herculean task for you under the most auspicious of circumstances. Wolfgang Well gee..... Seeing has how you've completely dismantled my argument point by point with such articulate alliteration..... -- Ric Hamel A misplaced Alaskan lost in ConUS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Alaskan420 wrote: "Wolfgang" wrote in message oups.com... Well gee..... Seeing has how you've completely dismantled my argument point by point with such articulate alliteration..... Have you counted how many people appear to be interested in dismantling your "arguments" articulately? Try it. It should be revelatory. Dumbass. Wolfgang and awaaaaay we go! ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HAVE YOU HEARD THE GOOD NEWS! | [email protected] | Bass Fishing | 0 | January 26th, 2005 01:24 AM |
old news | spoonplugger | Bass Fishing | 0 | November 4th, 2004 06:29 PM |
OT Good news, bad news | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 0 | October 21st, 2003 03:05 PM |