fishing fly in eye

http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:09:52 GMT, "asadi"
wrote:

http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html



EeeeeYuck! My eyes were flinching too much to watch more than a few
frames of it.

I hope it wasn't your* eye?
--

r.bc: vixen
Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

"Cyli"

EeeeeYuck! My eyes were flinching too much to watch more than a few
frames of it.

I hope it wasn't your* eye?
--

r.bc: vixen
Speaker to squirrels, willow watcher, etc..
Often taunted by trout. Almost entirely harmless. Really.

http://www.visi.com/~cyli

nope, I lucked out!

john

"asadi" wrote in message
. com...
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html


Disgusting, but thanks for posting. A good reminder. Barbless not to
mention sunglasses (they make sunglasses for both bright and dark
conditions. I have a yellow pair that makes fading light appear much
brighter - they're actually golf glasses.)

"asadi" wrote:
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html


(I don't have the stomach to wach the video, but have inferred some of the
details.)
Anybody hear Barbless Hooks in all this? I do it for myself and the people I
fish with, If it helps some fish, that's OK too. I don't think it costs me any
fish, but I don't care if it does.

Chas
remove fly fish to e mail directly

"jeffc" wrote in news:zeMwg.11914$4c7.367
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:


"asadi" wrote in message
. com...
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html


Disgusting, but thanks for posting. A good reminder. Barbless not to
mention sunglasses (they make sunglasses for both bright and dark
conditions. I have a yellow pair that makes fading light appear much
brighter - they're actually golf glasses.)



Great point. When I teach intro fly fishing, I make the point that eye
protection is mandatory.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

asadi wrote:
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html

I guess I don't understand this. Why didn't the guy just grab the hook
with his Dr. Slicks and pull it out? I mean, c'mon, if you foul hook a
trout in the eye are you going to risk losing your tee time while you
drive it to the vet? I just showed this to a new angler who couldn't
(or did not want to) watch it. I find this amazing. The marketing
fiction, that catch and release angling, where all fish are caught
harmlessly in the corner of the mouth, does not hurt the fish, is,
apparently working. I can't wait to see the video of removing a Grizzly
Kings from genetalia. Catch 100 trout and, what, 10?, will be hooked in
the vicinity of the eye and anus. Just math.

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel.

wrote in message
oups.com...

asadi wrote:
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html

I guess I don't understand this. Why didn't the guy just grab the hook
with his Dr. Slicks and pull it out? I mean, c'mon, if you foul hook a
trout in the eye are you going to risk losing your tee time while you
drive it to the vet? I just showed this to a new angler who couldn't
(or did not want to) watch it. I find this amazing. The marketing
fiction, that catch and release angling, where all fish are caught
harmlessly in the corner of the mouth, does not hurt the fish, is,
apparently working. I can't wait to see the video of removing a Grizzly
Kings from genetalia. Catch 100 trout and, what, 10?, will be hooked in
the vicinity of the eye and anus. Just math.

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel.

All of which makes it impossible to be anything but impressed and amazed
that all of the fish YOU catch and release escape entirely unscathed. How
DO you manage it......you fatassed brain-dead hypocrite?

Wolfgang
guilt debased the meal.

On 24 Jul 2006 12:37:59 -0700, wrote:


asadi wrote:
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html

I guess I don't understand this. Why didn't the guy just grab the hook
with his Dr. Slicks and pull it out? I mean, c'mon, if you foul hook a
trout in the eye are you going to risk losing your tee time while you
drive it to the vet? I just showed this to a new angler who couldn't
(or did not want to) watch it. I find this amazing. The marketing
fiction, that catch and release angling, where all fish are caught
harmlessly in the corner of the mouth, does not hurt the fish, is,
apparently working. I can't wait to see the video of removing a Grizzly
Kings from genetalia. Catch 100 trout and, what, 10?, will be hooked in
the vicinity of the eye and anus. Just math.

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel.

Well, no, not even "just math". It's clearly a wild-assed guess, and by my own
counts, a ****-poor wild-assed guess at that...

/daytripper ("Next!")

Wolfgang wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

asadi wrote:
http://ebaumsworld.com/2006/07/flyeye.html

I guess I don't understand this. Why didn't the guy just grab the hook
with his Dr. Slicks and pull it out? I mean, c'mon, if you foul hook a
trout in the eye are you going to risk losing your tee time while you
drive it to the vet? I just showed this to a new angler who couldn't
(or did not want to) watch it. I find this amazing. The marketing
fiction, that catch and release angling, where all fish are caught
harmlessly in the corner of the mouth, does not hurt the fish, is,
apparently working. I can't wait to see the video of removing a Grizzly
Kings from genetalia. Catch 100 trout and, what, 10?, will be hooked in
the vicinity of the eye and anus. Just math.

TBone
Guilt replaced the creel.

All of which makes it impossible to be anything but impressed and amazed
that all of the fish YOU catch and release escape entirely unscathed. How
DO you manage it......you fatassed brain-dead hypocrite?

Enter the priest.

Halfordian Golfer
It is impossible to catch and release a wild trout.

We caught one fish the other day on the Los Pinos, and that fish was
missing it's lower lip entirely and could not close its mouth. I'll
post a picture.