Putz

"Dave LaCourse" wrote in message
...

That was not a nasty post, Mark.

Do you just not read, or what Davey?

It was a post to ..... uh..... draw
you in, so to say.

So you're a spider now?

Show me the nasty part of that post?

"That will be easier than you think, Mark. Wolfgag is
already on my do-not-read list, and putting Barnard, you and Tatosian
on the same list should see me easilyl into the end of October."

6 : lacking in courtesy or sportsmanship--
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nasty

Do you really consider telling the entire NG that you have put "Wolfgag" in
your kill-file and that you intend to place rw, me, and Dave T. in your
kill-file to be pleasant and cordial discourse?

Was i to
lose no matter what I posted?

Yes Davey, but only because you can't help but be nasty, it's your nature.

I haven't lost, matey.

You're in da Nile, Davey. However, that's to be expected in your case.

If you are afraid to choose someone to be the
judge of my posts, so be it, but don't get all high and mighty on me.

Learn to read Davey! I never said I wouldn't choose someone--though I never
intended to. I said, "Jon is to dignafied [sp.dignified] to preside over
such nonsense, or didn't you gather that
from his previous posts about your bet with rw?"

Oooops, that last sentence *could* be construed to be "nasty" when it
actually ain't.

So it's jst a bit of light-heartedness between two people who hold one
another in contempt?

Jon, Stan, Tim, anyone but a biased you. Oh, gosh,
there goes another oooops.

It's a shame that all that retirement money can't buy you an ounce of
integrety :~^ (

Op


LaCourse