![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:15:53 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote: typed: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:49:11 -0400, "Tim J." wrote: Joe McIntosh typed: snip ...call 910 262 7761-you have to be close to get wife's cell phone. I hate to be the one to tell you this, Joe, but someone could be standing side-by-side with you and it would make no difference. These new-fangled cell phone devices ain't walkie-talkies, ya know! ;-) I hate to be the one to tell _you_ this, but some kinda are, or at least work for the end-user in much the same way. And depending on the carrier and type of phone, it's possible to have better luck across the country than standing next to each other. There are spots (both in and out of urban areas) where, for example, a particular Cingular customer can get service, but a Nextel/Cellular South/whoever customer can't and vice-versa. And if there aren't any towers in the area, nobody is talking to anybody... So, basically, in Joe's context of someone having to be nearby to call his wife's cell phone, what I said is correct then, right? Or are you saying some cell phones are phone-to-phone direct, which is what Joe implied? Some can be "phone-to-phone," (well, most commonly, it's more (internal) tower to (internal) tower, like Nextel, but see below) some can't, but IAC, some areas (although the number is dwindling and coverage areas and system-sharing agreements are increasing) are serviced with limited towers, all of the "local" carriers. I can think of a number of rural or just semi-rural areas that are now, or in some cases, less than 2 years ago were, in just such a circumstance. So, if you aren't using the same carrier AND in same general area, getting through is or was hit-or-miss. All I was pointing out was that from an end-user perspective, and under certain circumstances, "cellular" might seem very much like "walkie-talkies." TC, R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
typed:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:15:53 -0400, "Tim J." wrote: typed: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:49:11 -0400, "Tim J." wrote: Joe McIntosh typed: snip ...call 910 262 7761-you have to be close to get wife's cell phone. I hate to be the one to tell you this, Joe, but someone could be standing side-by-side with you and it would make no difference. These new-fangled cell phone devices ain't walkie-talkies, ya know! ;-) I hate to be the one to tell _you_ this, but some kinda are, or at least work for the end-user in much the same way. And depending on the carrier and type of phone, it's possible to have better luck across the country than standing next to each other. There are spots (both in and out of urban areas) where, for example, a particular Cingular customer can get service, but a Nextel/Cellular South/whoever customer can't and vice-versa. And if there aren't any towers in the area, nobody is talking to anybody... So, basically, in Joe's context of someone having to be nearby to call his wife's cell phone, what I said is correct then, right? Or are you saying some cell phones are phone-to-phone direct, which is what Joe implied? Some can be "phone-to-phone," (well, most commonly, it's more (internal) tower to (internal) tower, like Nextel, but see below) some can't, but IAC, some areas (although the number is dwindling and coverage areas and system-sharing agreements are increasing) are serviced with limited towers, all of the "local" carriers. I can think of a number of rural or just semi-rural areas that are now, or in some cases, less than 2 years ago were, in just such a circumstance. So, if you aren't using the same carrier AND in same general area, getting through is or was hit-or-miss. All I was pointing out was that from an end-user perspective, and under certain circumstances, "cellular" might seem very much like "walkie-talkies." I didn't know Nextel had direct phone-to-phone capabilities on some of their phones, even without network access. That's pretty cool. -- TL, Tim ------------------------- http://css.sbcma.com/timj |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:56:15 -0400, "Tim J."
wrote: typed: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:15:53 -0400, "Tim J." wrote: typed: On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:49:11 -0400, "Tim J." wrote: Joe McIntosh typed: snip ...call 910 262 7761-you have to be close to get wife's cell phone. I hate to be the one to tell you this, Joe, but someone could be standing side-by-side with you and it would make no difference. These new-fangled cell phone devices ain't walkie-talkies, ya know! ;-) I hate to be the one to tell _you_ this, but some kinda are, or at least work for the end-user in much the same way. And depending on the carrier and type of phone, it's possible to have better luck across the country than standing next to each other. There are spots (both in and out of urban areas) where, for example, a particular Cingular customer can get service, but a Nextel/Cellular South/whoever customer can't and vice-versa. And if there aren't any towers in the area, nobody is talking to anybody... So, basically, in Joe's context of someone having to be nearby to call his wife's cell phone, what I said is correct then, right? Or are you saying some cell phones are phone-to-phone direct, which is what Joe implied? Some can be "phone-to-phone," (well, most commonly, it's more (internal) tower to (internal) tower, like Nextel, but see below) some can't, but IAC, some areas (although the number is dwindling and coverage areas and system-sharing agreements are increasing) are serviced with limited towers, all of the "local" carriers. I can think of a number of rural or just semi-rural areas that are now, or in some cases, less than 2 years ago were, in just such a circumstance. So, if you aren't using the same carrier AND in same general area, getting through is or was hit-or-miss. All I was pointing out was that from an end-user perspective, and under certain circumstances, "cellular" might seem very much like "walkie-talkies." I didn't know Nextel had direct phone-to-phone capabilities on some of their phones, even without network access. That's pretty cool. I'm not just talking about ACTUAL "walkie-talkie" (meaning true unit-to-unit, although there are those types) communications. In the case of Nextel specifically, I'm talking about such as what Nextel _calls_ "walkie-talkie." Depending on what service you have, it _will_ matter where you and the other person are. But forgetting Nextel for the moment, there are other things that _could_ make it at least appear, from the end-user perspective, that range is a factor. It's not that big a deal, really. I just happened to see your post and offered my experience - as always, YMMV. TC, R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trip Report: Low Water (Long) | Steve | Fly Fishing | 8 | July 1st, 2005 03:54 PM |
What a Long Strange Trip (Report) | George Cleveland | Fly Fishing | 4 | June 21st, 2005 02:00 AM |
Trip report (link) - wild fishing in far north in Quebec | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 1 | March 31st, 2005 09:05 PM |
Western Clave trip report coming soon.... | Mike Makela | Fly Fishing | 0 | July 23rd, 2004 04:34 AM |