totally OT irrelvant inflamatory troll

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

TC,
R

wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Wolfgang

On 18 Oct 2006 17:52:39 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:18:17 -0400, "Wayne Harrison"
wrote:


"salmobytes" wrote

In the end, congress chose to believe uncle Thomas.
So how many of you now believe Anita Hill?

i, like wolfgang, didn't realize this chesnut had been rescued from the
flames. what up, bro?

Is this the first time we've had a pathological liar
sitting on the supreme court.........a guy, by they way,
who never says much and hardly ever writes an opinion?

no; and he doesn't say much because his hero, the great scalia, writes
the opinions and he merely concurs. gives him more time to waste.

Uh-oh...breaking out the _highly_ specialized trolls, eh? Let me return
the favor:

How to you support your comment above in light of such as "Ashcroft vs.
ACLU" or "Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld?"...

There's actually some interesting stuff out there on Scalia and Thomas
and this very subject.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Change your dress and get a new girdle...

....and order a cosmo...

Cheers,
Dickie
....hey, maybe one of them Yankee dudes will go get ya some mixer...

wrote:

Change your dress and get a new girdle...

...and order a cosmo...

Cheers,
Dickie
...hey, maybe one of them Yankee dudes will go get ya some mixer...

Hey, anybody wanna see dicklet twitch? Yeah? You sure? O.k., watch:

EMERIL

OPRAH

LATIFAH

Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang
absinthe absinthe absinthe absinthe.....

On 19 Oct 2006 03:49:51 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

Well, of course he did...death, taxes, and Wolfgang...all equally
enjoyable...

wrote:

Change your dress and get a new girdle...

...and order a cosmo...

Cheers,
Dickie
...hey, maybe one of them Yankee dudes will go get ya some mixer...

Hey, anybody wanna see dicklet twitch? Yeah? You sure? O.k., watch:

EMERIL

OPRAH

LATIFAH

Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang
absinthe absinthe absinthe absinthe.....

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

Right back at ya,
Dickie

wrote in message
...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

Right back at ya,
Dickie

Hee, hee, hee.

Wolfgang
the great thing about 'em isn't that you can make 'em do anything you want.
no, the great thing is that you can hand 'em a bit of string......and then
just sit back and watch.