![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Oz" wrote in message news ![]() My question revolves around practicality and what I should purchase to fish locally. We have a ton of lakes and one very good river (the Huron River) in my neighborhood. I would be fishing primarily for large mouth and small mouth bass and pan fish. Is there a single rod and reel that I could purchase to fish this variety of species - maybe a 6 weight? At this point, I am looking for lower end/beginner equipment because I am just beginning and would like to get my 15 year old son involved too. So, quite frankly, I am looking for something that would get us started and something that we could use to fish for the species I indicated. First, figure out what fish you want to catch. Then, figure out what lure (or fly) you want to use to catch them. Then, figure out what size line it will take to cast that fly. Then, match the rod to the line. Add in some extra weight in case you'll be casting into wind. The mistake some people make is going too light just because they're fishing for panfish. The fact is, some of those panfish bugs are big and bulky compared to tiny trout flies, and take bigger line to cast them comfortably. That's obviously even more true for bigger fish such as bass. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Oz" wrote in message m... Does that mean I will need a different rod/reel combo for panfish? No not necessarily. As I mentioned in another thread, some people go too light just because the fish is smaller. If you're casting tiny flies for panfish with no wind you can get away with a 3 or 4 weight. But a 7 weight will cast small flies just fine. A 3 wt will not cast big flies fine at all. If you can have one rod, it should probably be at least a 6 wt. If you are going to have 2, then you can get a 4 or 5 wt and then a 7 wt. You might try getting 2 and trading with your son. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For bass, go to a 7 wt. if not an 8 because this will throw
the larger streamers and poppers desirable in bass fishing. They might overload 6 wt. tackle or at least shorten your fishing day by fatigue. Besides, if you go out for winter steelhead or salmon you will appreciate being able to hold a big fish harder. "Oz" wrote in message m... Does that mean I will need a different rod/reel combo for panfish? No. The ultimate correlate of line weight is delicacy of presentation or the smallness of the fly you can fish effectively. When trout get ultra-selective, e.g. in a Trico hatch, your fly is size #20 or smaller, best fished with a 4-wt rod and line. But panfish usually take anything between fly size #1 and (small) size #14, the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Phillipson wrote:
"Oz" wrote: Does that mean I will need a different rod/reel combo for panfish? No. The ultimate correlate of line weight is delicacy of presentation or the smallness of the fly you can fish effectively. When trout get ultra-selective, e.g. in a Trico hatch, your fly is size #20 or smaller, best fished with a 4-wt rod and line. But panfish usually take anything between fly size #1 and (small) size #14, the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. A 7wt outfit is perfect for panfish ?!!? Just goes to show that the advice you receive on Usenet is worth exactly what you pay for it. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oz" wrote in message
news ![]() I am very interested in flyfishing and I want to start purchasing the equipment to begin in the Spring (I live in SE Michigan, near Ann Arbor, and it is starting to become crappy outside so I figure I should start preparing for Spring now - or at least start asking questions). My question revolves around practicality and what I should purchase to fish locally. We have a ton of lakes and one very good river (the Huron River) in my neighborhood. I would be fishing primarily for large mouth and small mouth bass and pan fish. Is there a single rod and reel that I could purchase to fish this variety of species - maybe a 6 weight? At this point, I am looking for lower end/beginner equipment because I am just beginning and would like to get my 15 year old son involved too. So, quite frankly, I am looking for something that would get us started and something that we could use to fish for the species I indicated. Thanks for your help and advice. Oz The most popular and all around rod is by far a 6 weight. You can pick up a decent combo for $250 or under. You get what you pay for Some of the 400-600 rods cast to a dime! If you find that the 6 wt is too heavy, then for your next rod buy a 4-5 weight , or if its too light buy a 7-8 wt But I would and did start w a 6 weight. It is a good tip to buy a good quality 6 wt floating line to start. Fred -- " |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken Fortenberry wrote: Don Phillipson wrote: "Oz" wrote: Does that mean I will need a different rod/reel combo for panfish? No. The ultimate correlate of line weight is delicacy of presentation or the smallness of the fly you can fish effectively. When trout get ultra-selective, e.g. in a Trico hatch, your fly is size #20 or smaller, best fished with a 4-wt rod and line. But panfish usually take anything between fly size #1 and (small) size #14, the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. A 7wt outfit is perfect for panfish ?!!? Depends. If the size of your dick depends on and is inversely proportional to the line rating of the rod that you catch a fish on, then no. If not, then who cares? Just goes to show that the advice you receive on Usenet is worth exactly what you pay for it. Of all the stupid aphorisms one can hardly avoid in this life despite one's not inconsiderable best efforts, those having to do with one or another stupid permutation of correlation between what one pays and what one gets for it are about the stupidest that one routinely encounters. Incidentally, just how much did the OP pay you for your advice? Wolfgang no charge for this one.......and you'll never get a better deal from anyone. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oz wrote: Howdy, Hi. ...My question revolves around practicality and what I should purchase to fish locally.... Most of the advice you've gotten here is pretty good.....as it generally is. You may take it as a given that it is now, and typically, worth a great deal more than you paid for it. However, the equipment you put your money into, while an important ingredient in a satisfying fly fishing experience, can be no better than what's using it, regardless of cost or quality. Don't forget to invest heavily in a good arm, eyes, sense of rhythm, etc. Even moderately good technique is infinitely more adaptable and valuable than the finest bits of stuff. Thanks for your help and advice. You're welcome. Oz Wolfgang |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
panfish usually take anything between fly size #1 and (small)
size #14, the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message . net... A 7wt outfit is perfect for panfish ?!!? My error: I should have written that fly size #2 to #14 is the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. (The #1 streamer is just too heavy for most casters on a 7-=wt; #2s are OK.) As the original text suggests, the 7-wt outfit is perfect for this range of fly size -- not for any one particular species of fish. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Phillipson wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: A 7wt outfit is perfect for panfish ?!!? My error: I should have written that fly size #2 to #14 is the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. (The #1 streamer is just too heavy for most casters on a 7-=wt; #2s are OK.) As the original text suggests, the 7-wt outfit is perfect for this range of fly size -- not for any one particular species of fish. That's right. One can cast a panfish fly with a 7wt but that doesn't make a 7wt the perfect fly fishing tool for panfish. A 7wt is *way* too much rod to be anything other than a servicable but less than ideal fly rod for panfish. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message . net... Don Phillipson wrote: "Oz" wrote: Does that mean I will need a different rod/reel combo for panfish? No. The ultimate correlate of line weight is delicacy of presentation or the smallness of the fly you can fish effectively. When trout get ultra-selective, e.g. in a Trico hatch, your fly is size #20 or smaller, best fished with a 4-wt rod and line. But panfish usually take anything between fly size #1 and (small) size #14, the normal range of flies for which a 7-wt outfit is perfect. A 7wt outfit is perfect for panfish ?!!? Pay attention. It's the perfect size for most panfish *flies* like poppers or little weighted jig-type things. That's the most important thing for most people. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|