Here are a bunch of clear thinkers, that kinow what they're saying

Having a mistaken belief that Saddam had WMDs is one thing. Going to war
over that mistaken belief is quite another. Waging the war with stunning
incompetence is yet another.

In any case, the fictitious WMDs were just a pretext for war. If WMDs
were the real reason we should have invaded Pakistan and North Korea.
The real reasons were a political calculation that an endless "war on
terrorism" would keep the neocons in power, a lust for oil, and an
Oedipal challenge to GWB's father, who didn't "finish the job."

Bush owns this war. Trying to pin the blame on Clinton is so ridiculous
that only the nuttiest of wing nuts would buy it.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
Bush owns this war. Trying to pin the blame on Clinton is so ridiculous
that only the nuttiest of wing nuts would buy it.

I haven't seen anyone say that, who are you replying to?
- Ken

wrote:
rw wrote:

Bush owns this war. Trying to pin the blame on Clinton is so ridiculous
that only the nuttiest of wing nuts would buy it.


I haven't seen anyone say that, who are you replying to?

I'm replying to the YouTube url that Cottrell posted -- the subject of
this thread. Didn't you watch it?

It's clearly an attempt to shift blame for the Iraq war to the
Democrats. The people who are most responsible (nearly exclusively
responsible) for this Iraq debacle are President Bush, Vice President
Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld, closely followed by cast of neocon
characters including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perl, William Kristol, and
others.

Wasn't this supposed to be the administration of personal responsibility?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
wrote:
rw wrote:

Bush owns this war. Trying to pin the blame on Clinton is so ridiculous
that only the nuttiest of wing nuts would buy it.


I haven't seen anyone say that, who are you replying to?

I'm replying to the YouTube url that Cottrell posted -- the subject of
this thread. Didn't you watch it?

I watched it, I think you took it wrong.
- Ken

wrote:
rw wrote:

I'm replying to the YouTube url that Cottrell posted -- the subject of
this thread. Didn't you watch it?


I watched it, I think you took it wrong.

You didn't think it was an attempt to shift blame to the Democrats?
Seriously?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw wrote:
wrote:
rw wrote:

I'm replying to the YouTube url that Cottrell posted -- the subject of
this thread. Didn't you watch it?


I watched it, I think you took it wrong.

You didn't think it was an attempt to shift blame to the Democrats?
Seriously?

Seriously! I think it was an attempt to expose their hypocrisy
on what they said then vs what they are saying now.
- Ken

"rw" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
rw wrote:

I'm replying to the YouTube url that Cottrell posted -- the subject of
this thread. Didn't you watch it?


I watched it, I think you took it wrong.

You didn't think it was an attempt to shift blame to the Democrats?
Seriously?

--

I saw a great Mike MacGavik** just this morning.

If you appreciate fine Irony, I'm sure you'll like it too.... if only it
gets on youtube.

Synopsis:
MM that republican paragon of corporateness, first starts by aligning
himself with the Green Party and Libertarian Party candidates in their
opposition to the war in Iraq.

He then launches into a scathing denunciation of Maria Cantwell for her
support of the sitting Republican President's pursuit and execution of a war
in Iraq.

It was high theatre....don't miss it if you can.

**
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_McGavick
http://www.mikemcgavick.com/

MM's press release on the ad:
http://www.mikemcgavick.com/pressrelease.asp?prid=126

Skwala
sitting this one out....

Skwala wrote:
...It was high theatre....don't miss it if you can....

Leaving only those of us who can't.

Hm.......

I've got a feeling that calculating the odds of success on this one is
going to be tougher than it may appear at a glance.

Skwala
sitting this one out....

Yeah. That's a good idea.

Wolfgang