![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Calif Bill" wrote in message ink.net... Not commenting on comparison to fly rods and can not connect the two. But modern rifles do not have an explosion in the firing chamber. That went out with black powder. Modern powders are considered propellents and have a longer burn time. Different powders, different burn rates. The distinction between propellants and explosives is doubtless a useful one in trades where people routinely use one or the other to make loud noises, and my reading confirms your classification of modern gunpowders among the former, as well as burn time being the deciding factor. However, I suspect that the distinction is rather arbitrary. The burn rate of high explosives makes them dangerous even when burned in small quantities in open air, while doing so with the slowest of propellants is relatively safe. THAT distinction is lost at whatever point is agreed upon as the dividing line between propellants and explosives. And, anyway, "relatively safe" is, if you will pardon the usage, a loaded term. The point of all this is that, "modern rifles do not have an explosion in the firing chamber" is dangerously misleading. Steam, air and carbon dioxide are not explosives; they are not even combustible. Nor, except in some specialized applications is any of them even a "propellant." And yet any of them (as well as a host of other more or less inert substances) can and DO cause explosions when confined under pressure. When all is said and done, it doesn't have to be an "explosive," as the term is used among pyrotechnicians, to explode. What takes place in the chamber of a gun (whether the motive force is supplied by burning powder or compressed air or carbon dioxide) IS an explosion. As to barrel movement. Guns normally tend to climb at the barrel as the lever arm is upward. The M-16 is designed to not climb or drop as the barrel is in line with the back of the stock. Why it has a carry handle. The sight plane is along the top of the handle. The muzzle of an M-16 doesn't rise as radically as that of many others, but it DOES rise. Been there......got it on film. Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Group dynamics | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 4 | July 23rd, 2006 07:19 PM |