![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 2:48 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote:
wrote in message http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/GLOB_CHA..._figs/fig3.gif the last 50 years can be "accurately" reproduced when both I wanted to write "can only be" up there, but my fingers didn't listen... When has anything that produced the results you wanted to see ever failed to be convincing enough? Plenty. Even if results come out as a scientist suspects they would, they should immediately be asking themselves about the internal validity, external validity, construct validity, etc., of their experiment. Plenty of things can go wrong, even if the p-values look great. Unfortunately, scientists being the human and social creatures they are, are not always as objective as they'd like to believe themselves to be. Science, for better or worse, is a social process. Jon. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 4:39 pm, wrote:
On Mar 13, 2:48 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote: wrote in message http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/GLOB_CHA..._figs/fig3.gif the last 50 years can be "accurately" reproduced when both I wanted to write "can only be" up there, but my fingers didn't listen... When has anything that produced the results you wanted to see ever failed to be convincing enough? Plenty. Even if results come out as a scientist suspects they would, they should immediately be asking themselves about the internal validity, external validity, construct validity, etc., of their experiment. Plenty of things can go wrong, even if the p-values look great. Unfortunately, scientists being the human and social creatures they are, are not always as objective as they'd like to believe themselves to be. Hm...... You could be right, maybe climatologists aren't real scientists like you and me. Yeah, I think you're onto something here.......stuff like that would NEVER occur to THEM. I mean, if it did....mind you, IF.....why then.....um......well, it would take them YEARS to come up with something like this! ****, they'd have to have.....uh.....well, like instruments and stuff.....and theories......and experiments.....and them whattyacallit.....anovas and stuff. Yeah! And then....and then.....well....they'd have to like rite jurnal articles and stuff......and who would read that stuff onacounta you and kennie have been like two busy latley? Temperatures! They'd haveta take temperatures! And balloons! Yeah! Science, for better or worse, is a social process. Well, it ain't ALL tea and crumpets in the lab I frequent daily. Wolfgang who can think of little he would enjoy more in the way of scientific experimentation than an opportunity to place seismometers on a few of the skulls around here. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Movie: An Inconvenient Truth | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 12 | July 13th, 2006 12:21 AM |
Movie: An Inconvenient Truth | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 8 | July 12th, 2006 12:07 AM |
Movie: An Inconvenient Truth | jeffc | Fly Fishing | 2 | July 10th, 2006 02:16 PM |
Ain't it the truth? | Charlie Bress | Saltwater Fishing | 1 | April 14th, 2006 11:41 PM |
The Truth About Carp | Super_Duper | Bass Fishing | 16 | June 25th, 2005 04:45 AM |