speaking of wiping asses with the Constitution.....

I'm not too quick to accept as "facts" the fact that some guy in Singapore
posts it to a blog. As noted by another,
you have do present better data than that OG, just find
and post the number and dates of such firings. As noted,
it is traditional to do a bit of patronage hiring at the beginning of a
term, but firing people midterm is less frequent, and the suggestion of a
wholesale turnover in year 5 or 6 of an administration borders on the
obscene.
Tom

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:19:24 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:

I'm not too quick to accept as "facts" the fact that some guy in Singapore
posts it to a blog. As noted by another,
you have do present better data than that OG, just find
and post the number and dates of such firings. As noted,
it is traditional to do a bit of patronage hiring at the beginning of a
term, but firing people midterm is less frequent, and the suggestion of a
wholesale turnover in year 5 or 6 of an administration borders on the
obscene.
Tom

FWIW, I think you'll find the Miers "clean house" nonsense was something
she proposed as a part of the replacing at beginning of Bush's 2nd term.
And also FWIW, Reno did ask all to resign, and many objective sources
speculated it had, at least in part, to things like Dan Rostenkowski's
troubles.

TC,
R

Tom Littleton wrote:
I'm not too quick to accept as "facts" the fact that some guy in Singapore
posts it to a blog. As noted by another,
you have do present better data than that OG, just find
and post the number and dates of such firings. As noted,
it is traditional to do a bit of patronage hiring at the beginning of a
term, but firing people midterm is less frequent, and the suggestion of a
wholesale turnover in year 5 or 6 of an administration borders on the
obscene.
Tom



Is it obscene? Why? Why were they fired? Were they fired for
non-performance?