![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I made a point about why do we bother we rod licenses a few days back, I wasn't very clear unfortunately, my point is, on most of the fisheries (especially here in south east wales ) they are mainly privately owned. For example, we have Cefn Mably, Peterstone lakes and warren mill which are pretty good venues. Now with the exception of warrren mill, these lake were man-made by the person who owns the land outright. They have made the lakes, stocked them with fish at thier expense and the lakes are maintained by staff employed at theses venues by the owners. When you go there for a days fishing you obviously have to pay for the day ticket, what I cannot see is why the EA have any right at all to go onto this privately owned property and expect people to have rod licenses. This means if I made a large pond in my own back garden, filled it with water, kept it clean by using electric filters, then stocked it with fish, according to the law I would need a rod license to fish in it. I simply cannot understand the logic in this at all. Clive |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Mar, 19:32, "clive" wrote:
Hi all I made a point about why do we bother we rod licenses a few days back, I wasn't very clear unfortunately, my point is, on most of the fisheries (especially here in south east wales ) they are mainly privately owned. For example, we have Cefn Mably, Peterstone lakes and warren mill which are pretty good venues. Now with the exception of warrren mill, these lake were man-made by the person who owns the land outright. They have made the lakes, stocked them with fish at thier expense and the lakes are maintained by staff employed at theses venues by the owners. When you go there for a days fishing you obviously have to pay for the day ticket, what I cannot see is why the EA have any right at all to go onto this privately owned property and expect people to have rod licenses. This means if I made a large pond in my own back garden, filled it with water, kept it clean by using electric filters, then stocked it with fish, according to the law I would need a rod license to fish in it. I simply cannot understand the logic in this at all. Clive Just another example of a government department having our pants down : ( |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that the EA have a right to control any inland water,
which theoretically probably includes fish ponds in gardens. It may seem ridiculous, but as an extreme example, think of this. You dig a pond in your garden, fill it with goldfish and one of those fish has a lurgy that will kill other fish within days. A bird lands in your pond for a drink, and gets that lurgy on its feet. It then flies off and lands on a large fishery; the lurgy spreads to all the fish there, and so on. The EA investigate, and if by chance they could track it back to your pond, they could enter your garden and deal with the lurgy at source. The EA tell us that most of the rod licence money goes towards this type of water safety and other conservation tasks, and I for one am grateful for it, as it helps to protect and improve my sport. From your earlier posts Clive, I make an assumption that you may not have been fishing for very long? When you have seen 100's of fish dead floating on a lake or river, and the EA arrive to inspect and take rearguard action to stop the spread, then the rod licence fee seems very worthwhile. Good to know DLA qualifies for a reduced cost though. Hope you are finding fishing a good hobby ('nutter' or not!). As for sea fishing licences, well thats another story. Impossible to enforce becasue of the many miles of coastline, and water borne pollutants are already rife with all the s*** that gets dumped in the sea. -- Regards, Ian "clive" wrote in message ... Hi all I made a point about why do we bother we rod licenses a few days back, I wasn't very clear unfortunately, my point is, on most of the fisheries (especially here in south east wales ) they are mainly privately owned. For example, we have Cefn Mably, Peterstone lakes and warren mill which are pretty good venues. Now with the exception of warrren mill, these lake were man-made by the person who owns the land outright. They have made the lakes, stocked them with fish at thier expense and the lakes are maintained by staff employed at theses venues by the owners. When you go there for a days fishing you obviously have to pay for the day ticket, what I cannot see is why the EA have any right at all to go onto this privately owned property and expect people to have rod licenses. This means if I made a large pond in my own back garden, filled it with water, kept it clean by using electric filters, then stocked it with fish, according to the law I would need a rod license to fish in it. I simply cannot understand the logic in this at all. Clive |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Hooksem" wrote in message ... My understanding is that the EA have a right to control any inland water, which theoretically probably includes fish ponds in gardens. It may seem ridiculous, but as an extreme example, think of this. You dig a pond in your garden, fill it with goldfish and one of those fish has a lurgy that will kill other fish within days. A bird lands in your pond for a drink, and gets that lurgy on its feet. It then flies off and lands on a large fishery; the lurgy spreads to all the fish there, and so on. The EA investigate, and if by chance they could track it back to your pond, they could enter your garden and deal with the lurgy at source. The EA tell us that most of the rod licence money goes towards this type of water safety and other conservation tasks, and I for one am grateful for it, as it helps to protect and improve my sport. From your earlier posts Clive, I make an assumption that you may not have been fishing for very long? When you have seen 100's of fish dead floating on a lake or river, and the EA arrive to inspect and take rearguard action to stop the spread, then the rod licence fee seems very worthwhile. Good to know DLA qualifies for a reduced cost though. Hope you are finding fishing a good hobby ('nutter' or not!). As for sea fishing licences, well thats another story. Impossible to enforce becasue of the many miles of coastline, and water borne pollutants are already rife with all the s*** that gets dumped in the sea. -- Regards, Ian "clive" wrote in message ... Hi all I made a point about why do we bother we rod licenses a few days back, I wasn't very clear unfortunately, my point is, on most of the fisheries (especially here in south east wales ) they are mainly privately owned. For example, we have Cefn Mably, Peterstone lakes and warren mill which are pretty good venues. Now with the exception of warrren mill, these lake were man-made by the person who owns the land outright. They have made the lakes, stocked them with fish at thier expense and the lakes are maintained by staff employed at theses venues by the owners. When you go there for a days fishing you obviously have to pay for the day ticket, what I cannot see is why the EA have any right at all to go onto this privately owned property and expect people to have rod licenses. This means if I made a large pond in my own back garden, filled it with water, kept it clean by using electric filters, then stocked it with fish, according to the law I would need a rod license to fish in it. I simply cannot understand the logic in this at all. Clive Hi Ian, Yes, I see your point, but am not really in agreement with you. and sorry for any confusion, I have been a regular fisherman for over 40 years. I think the rod license should be abolished altogether, it is a total waste of time, I know they say that the money goes towards the keeping of the waterways etc, but then again the EA is a government organisation, let them fund it. Most if not all of our rod license fees goes to pay these people who drive around asking to see the license. I have NEVER purchased a rod license in my life, and I never will. call me anti-establishment if you will, I'm not bothered. I pay £160.00 a year for a season ticket to fish my local privately owned carp lakes, I'm buggered if I'm going to pay for a rod license on top. I have been using these privately owned carp lake's now for over 15 years, I go as often as 4-5 times a week in the summer, and I have only ever once seen a EA baliff in all those years. and even he didn't even bother to ask to see my license. No, sorry, they will not get a penny out of me. And the same goes for the BBC....:-) Clive I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you? http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
License for fishing boat?? | JustMe | Fly Fishing | 6 | August 3rd, 2006 10:23 PM |
Florida fishing license | Jack Schmitt | Fly Fishing | 0 | May 16th, 2006 08:41 PM |
COST OF FISHING LICENSE | tommy | Bass Fishing | 36 | September 19th, 2004 04:30 AM |
NY Fishing License | Brad Killam | Bass Fishing | 10 | August 19th, 2004 06:30 AM |
NY Fishing license.. | Christopher P. Cericola | Bass Fishing | 13 | August 9th, 2004 03:45 PM |