![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry L wrote:
"Tom Littleton" wrote ... "casting skill" accounts for a VERY small percentage of angling success. Presentation involves so much more than distance casting or show casting. Mostly, it involves getting to the sweet spot where the actual cast is EASY, and avoiding being seen or heard by the fish. ... Imagine my surprise to find thought of value in these murky depths !! I post, again having read only 3 or 4 entries in this thread ( I quit following when I see certain names more than twice in a thread ), only to say that MY experience is exactly what the quoted passage above says. A FEW times each year I wish for better casting skills, and even then almost always better accuracy not distance, I'd kill for better approach and wading ability and need them every single day of fishing. ... Well, in Mike's defense he's talking about a whole different ballgame. I'd imagine when you're standing waist deep in the Baltic casting big streamers to small sea trout distance is more important than it is in the kind of fishing me and you Tom usually do. Stealth isn't an issue and wading ability means being able to stay on your feet when a wave hits. Not my cup of tea, I prefer little trout streams, but different strokes ... literally. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:45:11 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: Larry L wrote: "Tom Littleton" wrote ... "casting skill" accounts for a VERY small percentage of angling success. Presentation involves so much more than distance casting or show casting. Mostly, it involves getting to the sweet spot where the actual cast is EASY, and avoiding being seen or heard by the fish. ... Imagine my surprise to find thought of value in these murky depths !! I post, again having read only 3 or 4 entries in this thread ( I quit following when I see certain names more than twice in a thread ), only to say that MY experience is exactly what the quoted passage above says. A FEW times each year I wish for better casting skills, and even then almost always better accuracy not distance, I'd kill for better approach and wading ability and need them every single day of fishing. ... Well, in Mike's defense he's talking about a whole different ballgame. I'd imagine when you're standing waist deep in the Baltic casting big streamers to small sea trout distance is more important than it is in the kind of fishing me and you Tom usually do. Stealth isn't an issue and wading ability means being able to stay on your feet when a wave hits. Not my cup of tea, I prefer little trout streams, but different strokes ... literally. Well, a large percentage of the FFing down on the Gulf Coast involves standing waist-deep in water, flats fishing, or otherwise "distance casting" in the context of fishing, and none of what I've seen from his lairdship (I've not read ALL of it) is particularly applicable to much of anything or even correct. I can assure one and all that one can successfully fish for any species, any place, by simply matching line weight to rod marked weight. Sure, shooting heads/lines have there place in fishing, but even there, simply "matching labels" will work for anyone, anywhere, for any quarry. I suspect Mike has gotten on some tournament kick and/or otherwise thinks he is some real innovator, but he simply doesn't appear to know WTF he is talking about. And I readily invite anyone still reading to do as much research on the subject as they wish. I'd start by looking at what those with a vested interest in selling more stuff have already spent many years doing. IOW, look at what the various line companies offer, both in information and product. TC, R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:38:10 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: wrote: Ken Fortenberry wrote: Larry L wrote: "Tom Littleton" wrote ... "casting skill" accounts for a VERY small percentage of angling success. Presentation involves so much more than distance casting or show casting. Mostly, it involves getting to the sweet spot where the actual cast is EASY, and avoiding being seen or heard by the fish. ... Imagine my surprise to find thought of value in these murky depths !! I post, again having read only 3 or 4 entries in this thread ( I quit following when I see certain names more than twice in a thread ), only to say that MY experience is exactly what the quoted passage above says. A FEW times each year I wish for better casting skills, and even then almost always better accuracy not distance, I'd kill for better approach and wading ability and need them every single day of fishing. ... Well, in Mike's defense he's talking about a whole different ballgame. I'd imagine when you're standing waist deep in the Baltic casting big streamers to small sea trout distance is more important than it is in the kind of fishing me and you Tom usually do. Stealth isn't an issue and wading ability means being able to stay on your feet when a wave hits. Not my cup of tea, I prefer little trout streams, but different strokes ... literally. Well, a large percentage of the FFing down on the Gulf Coast involves standing waist-deep in water, flats fishing, or otherwise "distance casting" in the context of fishing, and none of what I've seen from his lairdship (I've not read ALL of it) is particularly applicable to much of anything or even correct. I can assure one and all that one can successfully fish for any species, any place, by simply matching line weight to rod marked weight. Sure, shooting heads/lines have there place in fishing, but even there, simply "matching labels" will work for anyone, anywhere, for any quarry. Oh yeah, I agree, His Royal Mikeness is as much full of **** as full of himself and his "theories" are laughable, I'm just saying distance can be a more important element of "presentation" in some situations. It can be, but "real distance" to a fisher is "don't even bother showing up" in a (absolute) distance tournament. Fishing distances, even extreme ones (in a fishing context) are readily reachable by standard, off-the-shelf stuff from any number of places - match up labels/weights and get after it. Tournament distances and those games are strenuous things and the distances reached are reached with specialized equipment that has no (real) use in fishing (even the "Angling distance" game isn't really like fishing for most, but it's closer). Heck, even if you _could_ use it fishing, only loons would _choose_ to. You'd have more fun digging a 10-foot deep, 10-foot around hole in hard ground with a old miner's pick. TC, R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new line | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 10 | March 14th, 2006 08:40 PM |
New line | Roddytoo | UK Game Fishing | 0 | May 3rd, 2005 09:06 PM |
WF vs DT Line | Tony & Barb Vellturo | Fly Fishing | 7 | March 22nd, 2005 09:15 PM |
P-Line | Bob La Londe | Bass Fishing | 1 | January 6th, 2004 02:53 AM |
Cajun Red Lightning fishing line vs Ande's Backwater fishing line | Basspro* | Saltwater Fishing | 4 | December 29th, 2003 04:54 AM |