Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean

On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
No ****ing doubt - Jose
I am a disturbed mo fo"
Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people who
throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about pigs

you must have known!

True...

We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat in 3
mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld.

Fred

Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this
medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use
of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is
apparently the case, then you might as well refrain.

Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a
fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in
particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you
finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort,
on your second attempt.

MC

Correctamundo Giuseppi!

You are the educated and intelligent one and all I can speak and understand
is mindless drivel
gagmmoomyvoken!!!! Yaaasbo!

You. my man. Mike the Conner are the bastion of reason sanity and the
American way and we - I - salute you

So run it up the flagpole Mike

No

Run the flagople up it.

I stand by my original opost
You are a fat creep
How much do you weigh?

Fred

On Apr 11, 8:25 am, wrote:
Correctamundo Giuseppi!

You are the educated and intelligent one and all I can speak and understand
is mindless drivel
gagmmoomyvoken!!!! Yaaasbo!

You. my man. Mike the Conner are the bastion of reason sanity and the
American way and we - I - salute you

So run it up the flagpole Mike

No

Run the flagople up it.

I stand by my original opost
You are a fat creep
How much do you weigh?

Fred

Hey dumbo, you started it. I fear you will have to rely on maintaining
your abstruse fantasies by dint of your obviously severely limited
imagination. Just follow the lead provided by your equally primitive
colleagues, Dick the ****, and The Frighteningly Foolish Fortenberry.

MC

typed:
Correctamundo Giuseppi!

You are the educated and intelligent one and all I can speak and
understand is mindless drivel

Since Ken is obviously asleep at the switch, I'll have to step in here.

Fred, you may not speak or understand mindless drivel, but you sure can
write it. Your replies never contain any of the original posts to which
you're replying, which makes the context extremely difficult to figure
out. Look at the other posts here - do you see what I mean? You need to
assume people are not following the entire thread all the way down to
your replies. Even *with* that context, your posts are near
intelligible. Take a little more time and read the stuff you write
before you hit the send button. A misspelled word here and there is not
a problem, but you have a bit more of an issue than that.

.. . . and be glad it was me instead of Ken. I'm the kinder, gentler one.
;-)
--
HTH,
Tim
---------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj/

Tim J. wrote:
typed:
Correctamundo Giuseppi! ...

Since Ken is obviously asleep at the switch, I'll have to step in here.

Fred, you may not speak or understand mindless drivel, but you sure can
write it. ...

I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and
then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer
screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle
of sockpuppets.

And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners
and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as
easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette
as it is to be a rude ****tard.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Apr 11, 1:19 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:


I watch Jon Stewart's "The Daily Show" at 10:00 Central and
then I'm down for the night. I don't sit in front of a computer
screen 24 hours a day like some loony fruitcake and his gaggle
of sockpuppets.

And yes Fred, you ignorant slut, learn some friggin' manners
and post in a way that isn't rude to the reader. It's just as
easy to construct a readable post using conventional netiquette
as it is to be a rude ****tard.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Tut tut....for somebody who constantly maintains he is opposed to foul
mouthed invective you certainly engage in a lot of it. Calling a bloke
a "slut" is a very strange thing to do. Perhaps you need a nappy
change?

MC

wrote in message
Tut tut....for somebody who constantly maintains he is opposed to foul
mouthed invective you certainly engage in a lot of it. Calling a bloke
a "slut" is a very strange thing to do. Perhaps you need a nappy
change?

MC


I think it is time to pour some chlorine into the gene pool and thin out
some of the nappies, nazzis, homo's and the like.... This is almost funny to
sit back and read all the flame war

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
No ****ing doubt - Jose
I am a disturbed mo fo"
Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people
who
throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about
pigs

you must have known!

True...

We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat
in 3
mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld.

Fred

Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this
medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use
of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is
apparently the case, then you might as well refrain.

Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a
fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in
particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you
finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort,
on your second attempt.

MC


As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe

As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe

I don´t have a dispute as such, I merely reply occasionally to
insulting posts. Anybody may post here, including dumbos, and they
frequently do. If you wish to "constructively and positively"
contribute here, although I cant really see why anybody would want to,
in the meantime, then posting something about fly-fishing or related
subjects is more likely to achieve such an aim, than posting negative
criticism of others.

Correct English usage is required for meaningful communication.
Posting gibberish is simply pointless, although there is nothing to
prevent anybody doing so.

MC

wrote in message
ups.com...


I don´t have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to
insulting posts. snip
MC

emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade.

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR