A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 11th, 2007, 08:30 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Moe[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean


wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
No ****ing doubt - Jose
I am a disturbed mo fo"
Disturbed about a lot of things The planet,Iraq, Iran our rivers, people
who
throw beercans ourt the car window, your nutso posts and talking about
pigs

you must have known!

True...

We just yesterday got three little pigs to fatten butcher and then eat
in 3
mos atheir names are Cheney Bush & Rumsfeld.

Fred


Your post is unintelligible. For meaningful communication in this
medium, it is necessary to conform to certain rules governing the use
of written English. Should you not be privy to these rules, which is
apparently the case, then you might as well refrain.

Or simply confine yourself to statements like "Again you sure are a
fat creep! " which although not apparently addressed to anybody in
particular, you later stated to be directed at myself, and which you
finally managed to complete, doubtless after prodigious mental effort,
on your second attempt.

MC


As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe


  #2  
Old April 11th, 2007, 08:46 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean


As an outsider to your dispute, and an infrequent poster (I try to post only
when I have a relevant On Post question to ask), it appears to me that
because you disagree with several regulars here that you think the solutoin
to your dispute is to destroy ROFF for all the other decent people that
might wish to read or post here. Or so you posted. And if people wishing to
post don't follow perfect english grammer usage and spelling, then they have
no right to post here? Forgive me for voicing an opinion, but that line of
reasoning seems absurd to me. This type of thinking is exactly the kind of
thing that discourages new posters and readers from constructively and
positively contributing to ROFF in the first place.

Jeremy Moe


I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply occasionally to
insulting posts. Anybody may post here, including dumbos, and they
frequently do. If you wish to "constructively and positively"
contribute here, although I cant really see why anybody would want to,
in the meantime, then posting something about fly-fishing or related
subjects is more likely to achieve such an aim, than posting negative
criticism of others.

Correct English usage is required for meaningful communication.
Posting gibberish is simply pointless, although there is nothing to
prevent anybody doing so.

MC

  #3  
Old April 12th, 2007, 01:36 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Bob Weinberger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean


wrote in message
ups.com...


I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to
insulting posts. snip
MC


emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade.

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR


  #4  
Old April 12th, 2007, 05:22 AM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Rerethinking Mike Connor, Ken Fortenberry, Wolfgang, and rdean

On Apr 12, 2:36 am, "Bob Weinberger"
wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

I donīt have a dispute as such, I merely reply *occasionally* to
insulting posts. snip

MC


emphasis added.. ROFLMAO. Definately the ROFF understatement of the decade.

Bob Weinberger La Grande, OR


Probably escaped your notice, but I did not reply to most, merely a
few of them.

Just for the record.

MC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rethinking Mike Connor... [email protected] Fly Fishing 77 April 12th, 2007 01:28 AM
The Mike Connor Fly Rod Wayne Fly Fishing 1 May 17th, 2004 03:33 PM
For Mike Connor Warren Fly Fishing 0 January 23rd, 2004 06:36 AM
ping Mike Connor Tim J. Fly Fishing 1 January 22nd, 2004 12:29 PM
For Mike Connor BishFish Fly Fishing 4 December 17th, 2003 04:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.