![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 10:37 am, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi Mike If this indeed is the case why do you keep hanging on here then? I hope that your presence here is indicating that you actually find ROFF useful to some extent? whatsoever to people of such a nature. It may be only words to some, or cheap entertainment, and ignorable, it is not for me. I appreciate your thoughts here. If everyone would live according to those words we would likely see less ignorants around here and one usenet in general for that matter. Seems as if many a newsgroup has been killed by people using this media as a way to engage in no-risk fights on words. I bet that they are the same wimpish people that never say the tinnies of 'ips' when they are in face-to-face situations. /Jan "One who would hate to see also ROFF die" No, I no longer find it useful, or even remotely enjoyable. Even when I posted fishing oriented material, it merely resulted in insults and slurs. I think it would be a good thing if it died, as that would take away the platform that some people are using to wilfully abuse others. They would not be allowed to post in other places, and that would effectively prevent many other people from being abused. There are plenty of very good angling sites on the net now, so it would be no great loss information-wise. Many people have already left, as they donīt wish to participate in a forum of this nature. Few will join, as a result of what they see happening here, and so the demise is accelerating all the time. The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Just as there is nothing I can do about the abuse and insults, there is nothing they can do about my posting. People who donīt like it, only have one sensible option, apart from ignoring a lot of stuff, and that is to leave. The natural tendency of most people is to take the line of least resistance. Even those who have not engaged in any of this nonsense, and are basically indifferent to it, will eventually become so sick of it that they will simply leave. Having to wade through all this crap, or killfile most of the group, in the vague hope of finding something useful or pleasant, is not something most sensible people are prepared to do. The ability to insult and abuse people with impunity is a two edged sword. TL MC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 2:18 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410 @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Indeed? That is a very interesting observation. What is your opinion on people who call others nazi homos, or a variety of other choice epithets? Nice guys? Pillars of society? Shining lights for youthful fly-anglers? Paragons of virtue? I have already been called a creep several times, it is boring. If you canīt think of something new to help with the circus then I rather fear your input is superfluous. MC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 3:09 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:1176380869.916237.321610 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: On Apr 12, 2:18 pm, Scott Seidman wrote: wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410 @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Indeed? That is a very interesting observation. What is your opinion on people who call others nazi homos, or a variety of other choice epithets? Nice guys? Pillars of society? Shining lights for youthful fly-anglers? Paragons of virtue? I have already been called a creep several times, it is boring. If you canīt think of something new to help with the circus then I rather fear your input is superfluous. MC Mike, Based on a person's behavior, I draw my opinions. Just because I don't spend my time here spouting off my opinion of others does not mean I do not have opinions of them. That said, I don't need you to tell me what those opinions are, or to whom I should state them. Your apparent assumption that I need your guidance in such matters is central to your arrogance problem. Should the behavior of others start interfering with my fair use of this board, as is your stated creepy goal (once again, "if I can't enjoy it, nobody will", a goal a petulant five year old would be proud to pursue), I will let them know, in no uncertain terms. Further, I wasn't necessarily calling you a name. I was telling you what I think of you. There is a difference. Illustratively, I can't believe anyone reading roff could conceivably believe you are a "nappy-headed nazi homo", which you have been called numerous times. Many, however, would glady second "creep". You're on a tear George Gherke himself would be proud of. I suspect he's looking down on all this right now, snickering about how right he was about you. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Here, the word "creep" is simply a general insult. I assumed nothing at all, I merely asked a few questions. It seems my ideas of honour and fairness differ very considerably from others on this group. I owe you no explanations, nor do I owe anybody else any. I will continue to pursue my aims as long as I consider it politic to do so. Since I don īt believe in anything at all, much less a saintly Gehrke looking down from somewhere, I must perforce undertake my own endeavours in defending myself against those who would malign me. What you write is of passing interest, but it gets me no nearer to my target. What you believe is also irrelevant. It is not a case of "if I can't enjoy it, nobody will", it is a case of doing my absolute utmost to ensure that these people can not continue to malign me, here or elsewhere, and preferably to ensure that they donīt do it to anybody else either. MC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Apr 2007 13:09:09 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: wrote in news:1176380869.916237.321610 : On Apr 12, 2:18 pm, Scott Seidman wrote: wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410 @d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Indeed? That is a very interesting observation. What is your opinion on people who call others nazi homos, or a variety of other choice epithets? Nice guys? Pillars of society? Shining lights for youthful fly-anglers? Paragons of virtue? I have already been called a creep several times, it is boring. If you canīt think of something new to help with the circus then I rather fear your input is superfluous. MC Mike, Based on a person's behavior, I draw my opinions. Just because I don't spend my time here spouting off my opinion of others does not mean I do not have opinions of them. That said, I don't need you to tell me what those opinions are, or to whom I should state them. Your apparent assumption that I need your guidance in such matters is central to your arrogance problem. Should the behavior of others start interfering with my fair use of this board, as is your stated creepy goal (once again, "if I can't enjoy it, nobody will", a goal a petulant five year old would be proud to pursue), I will let them know, in no uncertain terms. Further, I wasn't necessarily calling you a name. I was telling you what I think of you. There is a difference. Illustratively, I can't believe anyone reading roff could conceivably believe you are a "nappy-headed nazi homo", which you have been called numerous times. Many, however, would glady second "creep". You're on a tear George Gherke himself would be proud of. I suspect he's looking down on all this right now, snickering about how right he was about you. Heck, even I don't actually believe he's _actually_ a nappy-headed Nazi homo ho...I mean, who would actually pay HIM for sex... HTH, R...er, Dickie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Apr 2007 12:18:56 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote: wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410 : The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that. Naw, it would make just as impotent here as he is everywhere else, including his own little life...just a sad little nappy-headed Nazi homo ho... TC, R |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 2:40 pm, wrote:
On 12 Apr 2007 12:18:56 GMT, Scott Seidman wrote: wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410 : The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that demise in any way I can. Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that. Naw, it would make just as impotent here as he is everywhere else, including his own little life...just a sad little nappy-headed Nazi homo ho... TC, R I wonder how sad that makes someone who goes around calling people sad little nappy-headed nazi homos? You are a piece of filth. The only reason you stay here is that here you can get away with being a piece of filth. MC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rethinking Mike Connor... | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 77 | April 12th, 2007 01:28 AM |