![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote: Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I merely thought that somebody who doesnīt mind when people are referred to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I will make many more. MC |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On 12 Apr 2007 03:15:34 -0700, wrote: On Apr 11, 11:49 am, Dave LaCourse wrote: On 10 Apr 2007 22:30:49 -0700, wrote: Human interaction requires humans, and not degenerate pigs. There you go again........... tsk, tsk, tsk Well I certainly am sorry if I offended your delicate sensibilities. I merely thought that somebody who doesnīt mind when people are referred to as nazi homos, or Cun** or a whole lot of of other similar pleasantries, would hardly be offended at precisely those people being referred to as degenerate pigs. My mistake. No problem, I am sure I will make many more. Mike, Fortenberry and Richard *are* human beings, not degenerate pigs. They are not degenerate human beings either. They have opinions just like you. If they call you names, ignore them. You fall for the trap every time they bait you and you can not see it. They are better at this than you are, and probably take delight in every angry post you make. You will never destroy roff. There are too many good people here (and that includes the two mentioned above) for you or anyone else to succeed. By even attempting such a scheme says volums about your integrity. If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. They are dishonourable degenerate assholes, who hide behind their keyboards in order to safely abuse others. I donīt know how many times I have to tell you this, but I am not in the least angry. I am merely carrying out what is necessary to achieve my aims. You donīt know anything at all about my integrity, and the rest of your post is a load of nonsense as well. You are just a dumbo. It is always very surprising to a lot of people what one determined and resourceful person can achieve, given sufficient motivation. I am going to wipe your stupid face in the **** you flung at me. Come back and tell me about my integrity when you and the other dumb assholes are the only people left here, trading puerile insults with each other, for lack of sense and imagination. MC |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of satisfaction? If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay you're not likely to get that on your present course. If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals. No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that. If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best, you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave. You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it. The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes. By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it. Joe F. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 3:41 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. If I may ask directly then, what does your honour demand by way of satisfaction? If you're looking for an apology from individuals or the group, I daresay you're not likely to get that on your present course. If you demand that all who have slighted or insulted you in the past be forever banished from this group, I fear you are setting unrealistic goals. No one has that power, and it isn't going to happen. You know that. If you demand, alternatively, that this group dissolve, thus depriving those posters of their forum, this too is unrealistic. Your present course of action is, I daresay, leading in exactly the opposite direction. At best, you will drive off only the "benign" posters, for those who thrive on the confrontation are enjoying the contest and will be the last ones to leave. You are merely harming innocents, those who actually seek knowledge, those who you claim to want to help. Furthermore, your volume of posts serves to inflate the perceived popularity of the group more so than to destroy it. The more you post, the statistically stronger ROFF becomes. By all means, carry on if you like; but I can't see where it's going to satisfy your honour as much as irredeemably harm it. Joe F. I am not demanding anything at all. As you quite rightly point out, any demands at all would be completely unrealistic. Also, I have no more right to make demands than anybody else. Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. The "benign" posters will have no trouble at all staying in contact, or in posting elsewhere if they wish. Only the filth will be contained here. Isolating filth is a public service, like containing rats or cockroaches. They can trade filth among themselves as much as they like, nobody will care, but they cant damage any decent people. Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. MC |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. One learns a lot. MC |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 5:35 am, wrote:
On Apr 12, 1:51 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote: If you leave roff you will be missed, but if you continue your present course, more and more people are going to be against you. What a load of bull****. You dumbo were so stuck for an insult, you even told me my doggerel was ****. Gave me a laugh at least. If I continue my present course, there will be fewer people left to be against me. Also, I have not yet even bothered to call on any allies. Why donīt you just wait and see what happens? Not one dumbo, or a whole bunch of them, is going to **** me about like this and get away with it. It has nothing to do with ego either, it is a matter of personal honour. MC You've already lost the war no matter how many "allies" you bring in. Sorry Mike, but you are acting just like GeorgeG. Sincerely, - Ken |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 4:20 pm, "rb608" wrote:
wrote in message Neither do I expect to gain any satisfaction whatsoever as a result of my actions. Well, that's the part that confuses me then. If not, why waste so much time doing it? Statistics are meaningless here. The numbers mean nothing if ninety per cent of the posts are just rubbish. That would be only a slight increase from the usual numbers. ROFF has always had a low signal to noise ratio. You can't kill the group, you won't significantly change what happens here on most days here with or without you, you can't drive off the purported offenders, and you expect to gain no satisfaction. What's the point then of the intentional disruption? Joe F. One learns a lot. MC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rethinking Mike Connor... | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 77 | April 12th, 2007 01:28 AM |
The Mike Connor Fly Rod | Wayne | Fly Fishing | 1 | May 17th, 2004 03:33 PM |
For Mike Connor | Warren | Fly Fishing | 0 | January 23rd, 2004 06:36 AM |
ping Mike Connor | Tim J. | Fly Fishing | 1 | January 22nd, 2004 12:29 PM |
For Mike Connor | BishFish | Fly Fishing | 4 | December 17th, 2003 04:46 PM |