![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sandy" wrote in message . .. Wolfgang wrote: and I don't recall ever catching a fish with one on the few occasions that I tried, but fun stuff to play with. Wolfgang Didn't Vincent Marinaro make some experimental spinners (adult mayflies, that is) with small clipped and plugged quill bodies? Don't know about Marinaro, but I do have a vague recollection of running into references somewhere in the literature a long time ago. Marinaro used to be my fly tying role model, until he published "In the Ring of the Rise" and tried convice me (us) that a house fly pattern with crossed front legs--made from two individual hackle fibers--was a reasonable thing to do. Well, it IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't adhere to the narrow view that reasonableness is affected by such mundane considerations as utility, time, cost, effort, etc. After that I took a deep breath and sigh, and reverted back to my redneck roots. Crickets, crawdads and crawlers? See Forgotten Treasures #18, the second half of which was just posted here accidentally, over in ROFF for an interesting look at the latter. ![]() Wolfgang Wolfgang |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang wrote:
Well, it (house fly legs) IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't adhere to the narrow view that reasonableness is affected by such mundane considerations as utility, I don't object to tying the fly that way. I tie lots of bizarre and largely irrelevant flies. But I (still can't) buy Marinaro's argument that it did indeed matter--that he caught more fish on house fly patterns that had two criss-crossed front legs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sandy" wrote in message . .. Wolfgang wrote: Well, it (house fly legs) IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't adhere to the narrow view that reasonableness is affected by such mundane considerations as utility, I don't object to tying the fly that way. I tie lots of bizarre and largely irrelevant flies. But I (still can't) buy Marinaro's argument that it did indeed matter--that he caught more fish on house fly patterns that had two criss-crossed front legs. Doesn't seem likely, does it? I'd have to see it myself.....several times.....before accepting it as gospel.. Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|