A Fishing forum. FishingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » FishingBanter forum » rec.outdoors.fishing newsgroups » Fly Fishing Tying
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Temptation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 18th, 2007, 08:34 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,897
Default Temptation


"sandy" wrote in message
. ..
Wolfgang wrote:
and I don't recall ever catching a fish with one
on the few occasions that I tried, but fun stuff to play with.

Wolfgang


Didn't Vincent Marinaro make some experimental spinners
(adult mayflies, that is) with small clipped and plugged
quill bodies?


Don't know about Marinaro, but I do have a vague recollection of running
into references somewhere in the literature a long time ago.

Marinaro used to be my fly tying role model, until
he published "In the Ring of the Rise" and tried
convice me (us) that a house fly pattern with crossed front
legs--made from two individual hackle fibers--was a reasonable
thing to do.


Well, it IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't adhere to the narrow view
that reasonableness is affected by such mundane considerations as utility,
time, cost, effort, etc.

After that I took a deep breath and sigh, and reverted
back to my redneck roots.


Crickets, crawdads and crawlers? See Forgotten Treasures #18, the second
half of which was just posted here accidentally, over in ROFF for an
interesting look at the latter.

Wolfgang

Wolfgang


  #2  
Old April 18th, 2007, 09:01 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
sandy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Temptation

Wolfgang wrote:


Well, it (house fly legs) IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't adhere to the narrow view
that reasonableness is affected by such mundane considerations as utility,


I don't object to tying the fly that way.
I tie lots of bizarre and largely irrelevant flies.

But I (still can't) buy Marinaro's argument that it
did indeed matter--that he caught more
fish on house fly patterns that had two criss-crossed front legs.

  #3  
Old April 18th, 2007, 08:55 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly.tying
Wolfgang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,897
Default Temptation


"sandy" wrote in message
. ..
Wolfgang wrote:


Well, it (house fly legs) IS reasonable......as long as one doesn't
adhere to the narrow view that reasonableness is affected by such mundane
considerations as utility,


I don't object to tying the fly that way.
I tie lots of bizarre and largely irrelevant flies.

But I (still can't) buy Marinaro's argument that it
did indeed matter--that he caught more
fish on house fly patterns that had two criss-crossed front legs.


Doesn't seem likely, does it? I'd have to see it myself.....several
times.....before accepting it as gospel..

Wolfgang


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FishingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.