![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no objection to stocking where natural reproduction can't take
place. Stocking places where natural reproduction is possible is detrimental to natural trout. Ernie I'd be curious to know the exact number of states which have naturally reproducing trout populations. Of that number, how many had to have trout introduced into them to establish that population? While hatchery trout may not taste or fight like wild trout, and while put & take fishing is far less desirable than stalking and catching fish from natural populations, such programs do provide money that goes into conservation budgets. The people who make use of such programs not only buy licenses but rods, reels, flies, lines and all the cute little gadgets that make other fly fishers happy. Many of them will never fling flies anyplace else. Some will progress and move onto other waters. Having such places actually does decrease pressure on natural populations in marginal waters. While the purists among us can sneer and moan about such things, there are many people who are quite happily served by such fishing arrangements. And everyone of them who fishes there is not standing next to you throwing his line over yours. When I grew up, where I grew up, seafood consisted of breaded, fried shrimp shipped frozen and tasteless. I was fortunate to move and find out that other seafood existed. Even today, there are parts of the nation where "red lobster" provides the best seafood available. Sad but true. ---- Stev Lenon 91B20 '68-'69 Drowning flies to Darkstar http://web.tampabay.rr.com/stevglo/i...age92kword.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|