![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 8:18 pm, forthesky wrote:
There is no way 2 guys or even 20 could "fish out" even a small lake. maybe a tiny "pond". You seem pretty sure of that from 1,000 miles away. Lake Blue Heron is drained right now to repair the dam and scrape the years of accumulated muck off the bottom. During the time period that these two guys caught all of the breeding sized bass is was extremely shallow and had no natural cover. It was just a bowl. The guys built five "fish attractors" that concentrated the fish in those five areas and made them easy picking. I believe there is no way a Lake could be "fished out". You are hiding your head in the sand. Here in PA whenever a lake or dam (and we have small ones too) gets low on fish, The PFBC slaps a "big bass" limitation and reduced creel limit into effect and usually within two years the fish stock is back up. And that is with literally hundreds if not thousands of anglers using the lake or dam. If your state has no such wildlife conservation in effect , then perhaps your states anglers should push for better management. Florida's laws allow a fisherman to keep one bass a day over 22 inches and up to five total over 12 inches. That law is effective except in such an extreme case. again I must say The Fact is, if you are bothered by the sight of seeing someone legally catch a legal size and legal limit of fish and KEEP them, you DON'T belong behind a fishing rod. Your reading comprehension is poor, isn't it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Your reading comprehension is poor, isn't it? No, but neither is your sarcasm and self-righteousness. But that was an almost good shot at someone when your argument was getting weak. In extreme cases I guess anything is possible. But for your poor reading abilities I will simplify. I am talking about the C&R guy that thinks the taking of ANY fish is a shameful act. I am NOT talking about extreme cases of abuse or waste. FWIW you come off as a person who must think he is right about everything and feels very important, so I am sure you will have something witty and sarcastic to reply with. my hat's off to you prince olebiker, all hail the prince. Forthesky Western PA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 9:00 pm, forthesky wrote:
Your reading comprehension is poor, isn't it? No, but neither is your sarcasm and self-righteousness. But that was an almost good shot at someone when your argument was getting weak. In extreme cases I guess anything is possible. But for your poor reading abilities I will simplify. I am talking about the C&R guy that thinks the taking of ANY fish is a shameful act. I am NOT talking about extreme cases of abuse or waste. FWIW you come off as a person who must think he is right about everything and feels very important, so I am sure you will have something witty and sarcastic to reply with. my hat's off to you prince olebiker, all hail the prince. Forthesky Western PA Lets try this one more time: I have no problem with a guy keeping a few small bass to eat. My problem is with the guys who kill our breeding stock. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lets try this one more time: I have no problem with a guy keeping a few small bass to eat. My problem is with the guys who kill our breeding stock. Please define what you mean by "few small" and "breeding stock". would you prefer 100 lunkers or 200 15 inchers in a given body of water? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 11:40 pm, forthesky wrote:
Lets try this one more time: I have no problem with a guy keeping a few small bass to eat. My problem is with the guys who kill our breeding stock. Please define what you mean by "few small" and "breeding stock". would you prefer 100 lunkers or 200 15 inchers in a given body of water? Here in Florida, I would consider a 12 to 15 inch bass to be a candidate for the skillet if you chose to eat bass. Here's some information from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission: "Age and Growth - Growth rates are highly variable with differences attributed mainly to their food supply and length of growing season. Female bass live longer than males and are much more likely to reach trophy size. By age two or three, females grow much faster than male bass. Males seldom exceed 16 inches, while females frequently surpass 22 inches. At five years of age females may be twice the weight of males. One-year old bass average about seven inches in length and grow to an adult size of 10 inches in about 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 years." If you limit yourself to bass under 15 inches you are less likely to be catching and killing a breeding sized female. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:57:36 -0700, Olebiker wrote:
On Jun 7, 11:40 pm, forthesky wrote: Lets try this one more time: I have no problem with a guy keeping a few small bass to eat. My problem is with the guys who kill our breeding stock. Please define what you mean by "few small" and "breeding stock". would you prefer 100 lunkers or 200 15 inchers in a given body of water? Here in Florida, I would consider a 12 to 15 inch bass to be a candidate for the skillet if you chose to eat bass. Here's some information from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission: "Age and Growth - Growth rates are highly variable with differences attributed mainly to their food supply and length of growing season. Female bass live longer than males and are much more likely to reach trophy size. By age two or three, females grow much faster than male bass. Males seldom exceed 16 inches, while females frequently surpass 22 inches. At five years of age females may be twice the weight of males. One-year old bass average about seven inches in length and grow to an adult size of 10 inches in about 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 years." If you limit yourself to bass under 15 inches you are less likely to be catching and killing a breeding sized female. well there might be the problem. It seems florida has it all backwards. Here in PA when a lake starts to get "fished out" they slap "big bass" regulations in effect. "big bass" means you can ONLY keep bass OVER 15 inches. This has worked superbly here in PA with Lake recovery time at about a year or so. All or lakes up here are full of bass, and i mean FULL. So if the lakes in florida are stressed, maybe it has to do with florida's backwards (at least from PA law) guidelines. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "forthesky" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:57:36 -0700, Olebiker wrote: On Jun 7, 11:40 pm, forthesky wrote: Lets try this one more time: I have no problem with a guy keeping a few small bass to eat. My problem is with the guys who kill our breeding stock. Please define what you mean by "few small" and "breeding stock". would you prefer 100 lunkers or 200 15 inchers in a given body of water? Here in Florida, I would consider a 12 to 15 inch bass to be a candidate for the skillet if you chose to eat bass. Here's some information from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission: "Age and Growth - Growth rates are highly variable with differences attributed mainly to their food supply and length of growing season. Female bass live longer than males and are much more likely to reach trophy size. By age two or three, females grow much faster than male bass. Males seldom exceed 16 inches, while females frequently surpass 22 inches. At five years of age females may be twice the weight of males. One-year old bass average about seven inches in length and grow to an adult size of 10 inches in about 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 years." If you limit yourself to bass under 15 inches you are less likely to be catching and killing a breeding sized female. well there might be the problem. It seems florida has it all backwards. Here in PA when a lake starts to get "fished out" they slap "big bass" regulations in effect. "big bass" means you can ONLY keep bass OVER 15 inches. This has worked superbly here in PA with Lake recovery time at about a year or so. All or lakes up here are full of bass, and i mean FULL. So if the lakes in florida are stressed, maybe it has to do with florida's backwards (at least from PA law) guidelines. You have northern strain LMB. They grow slower and don't get as big. Historically minimum size limtis makes for lots of fish right at and below the minimum size. -- Bob La Londe Fishing Arizona & The Colorado River Fishing Forums & Contests http://www.YumaBassMan.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do little bass swim faster than big bass? | John B | Bass Fishing | 7 | April 29th, 2007 10:19 PM |
Fake conservationists' killing again. | [email protected] | UK Coarse Fishing | 0 | March 13th, 2006 09:09 AM |
Killing a bass is MURDER !!!!!! | Bruno Beam | Bass Fishing | 11 | December 17th, 2004 02:38 AM |
both killing now, Ratana and Chester rejected the upper monuments beneath think butcher | Leonardo Serni | General Discussion | 0 | April 21st, 2004 08:42 PM |
Winter is killing me | alwayfishking | Bass Fishing | 19 | February 20th, 2004 11:04 AM |