![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message t... Tom Nakashima wrote: Has anyone here tried the Cortland 444 Sylk line? It has a smaller dia. than most of the Double Taper lines on the market. I was wondering how it cast, and since it's smaller in dia, how it would rollcast. I have a Cortland Sylk DT4 that I use on a bamboo rod. It's great for delicate work, laying out a gentle 25 foot cast, but not good for distance or roll casting. It's a very limp, and I mean *very* limp, fly line. I have a real Phoenix Silk fly line in DT5 for my other bamboo and the Cortland Sylk is even limper than the real thing. If you're used to a stiff, slick coating on your fly line for roll casting etc., you probably wouldn't like Cortland Sylk. -- Ken Fortenberry How do you like the Phoenix Silk? Rollcast? I just pulled up the Phoenix website, so you dress the line accordingly? Sinking, floating? Expensive line. $268.07 = 190.00 Euro for 7wt DT...think I converted that right. I'll probably stick with the conventional DT line for now, I enjoy the rollcast. -tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Nakashima wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: ... I have a real Phoenix Silk fly line in DT5 for my other bamboo and the Cortland Sylk is even limper than the real thing. If you're used to a stiff, slick coating on your fly line for roll casting etc., you probably wouldn't like Cortland Sylk. How do you like the Phoenix Silk? Rollcast? I just pulled up the Phoenix website, so you dress the line accordingly? Sinking, floating? Expensive line. $268.07 = 190.00 Euro for 7wt DT...think I converted that right. I'll probably stick with the conventional DT line for now, I enjoy the rollcast. It's a great fly line, it may sound expensive but properly taken care of it will outlast 5 or 6 plastic lines. All I have to do now is live long enough to realize the cost benefit. ;-) I don't rollcast much and I don't fish anything other than a floating line with the bamboo rod. I treat the silk with Red Mucilin and when it starts to sink (5-6 hours of fishing) I turn the DT around and fish the other end. I hang it up to dry overnight, treat both ends again the next morning and it's ready to go for 10-12 more hours of fishing. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 9, 4:22 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote: It's a great fly line, it may sound expensive but properly taken care of it will outlast 5 or 6 plastic lines. All I have to do now is live long enough to realize the cost benefit. ;-) I bought a Phoenix silk fly line several years ago with this same mindset. Unfortunately, a mouse got into my fly fishing gear and gnawed the silk line into several pieces. 1 out of 1 garage mice prefer silk to plastic. Is it just me or have silk lines gone way up in price in the last, say, 5 years. Seems like I bought mine for $90 which seemed like a ripoff at the time (not that it stopped me) but that was nothing compared to the $250ish today. --Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zimbo wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote: It's a great fly line, it may sound expensive but properly taken care of it will outlast 5 or 6 plastic lines. All I have to do now is live long enough to realize the cost benefit. ;-) I bought a Phoenix silk fly line several years ago with this same mindset. Unfortunately, a mouse got into my fly fishing gear and gnawed the silk line into several pieces. 1 out of 1 garage mice prefer silk to plastic. Is it just me or have silk lines gone way up in price in the last, say, 5 years. Seems like I bought mine for $90 which seemed like a ripoff at the time (not that it stopped me) but that was nothing compared to the $250ish today. Phoenix silk lines cost about the same as they always have, it's the US dollar going down the toilet that makes them much more expensive to import. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zimbo wrote:
Is it just me or have silk lines gone way up in price in the last, say, 5 years. Seems like I bought mine for $90 which seemed like a ripoff at the time (not that it stopped me) but that was nothing compared to the $250ish today. You'd have to be a complete fool to pay that much for a flyline. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ken Fortenberry wrote: It's a great fly line, it may sound expensive but properly taken care of it will outlast 5 or 6 plastic lines. All I have to do now is live long enough to realize the cost benefit. ;-) The SA sharkskin also outlasts conventional lines by 6x. And is only $100. And casts farther. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cortland 444 Sylk | Ken Fortenberry | Fly Fishing | 7 | April 29th, 2005 12:34 AM |
Cortland 444 Lazerline vs. 555 Line | Keith | Fly Fishing | 1 | February 8th, 2005 06:40 PM |
TR: Sylk | VibraJet | Fly Fishing | 2 | June 27th, 2004 04:06 PM |
Cortland "Classic Sylk" fly line? | Conan The Librarian | Fly Fishing | 1 | May 26th, 2004 03:12 PM |
Cortland 444 line vs. 444 lazerline | Plattelines | Fly Fishing | 6 | February 22nd, 2004 09:32 PM |