VP huntin and npr program...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:51:49 -0700, "asadi"
wrote:

It appears the ranch Dick hunts on works in this fashion.

The birds are raised in a pen...you tell the 'guides' how many birds you
want to shoot.

You go out into the field and take up your position. The 'guide' takes the
bird into a bush and when you are ready, he let's them go...

The bird gets maybe 4 seconds of freedom . . .

I thought it was pretty sick...

john

Why do you think it "sick?" If past performance is even the slightest
indication of future performance, a wag might offer that the 'guide' has
more to worry about than the bird, but IAC, the description above isn't
truly reflective of most such hunts. Moreover, unless you refuse to
fish in any water that might possibly contained stocked fish, IMO, your
criticism of another's method of hunting is hypocritical. You seem to
assign at least some importance to the "4 seconds of freedom." How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

unpsortingly sick....sickly unsporting...sickeningly
unsporting...unspprtingly sickening....sport sick...sick sport...sickening
sport...sportingly sick...sporting sick....that's about all I can think of
offhand...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

john

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:55:00 -0700, "asadi"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:51:49 -0700, "asadi"
wrote:

It appears the ranch Dick hunts on works in this fashion.

The birds are raised in a pen...you tell the 'guides' how many birds you
want to shoot.

You go out into the field and take up your position. The 'guide' takes the
bird into a bush and when you are ready, he let's them go...

The bird gets maybe 4 seconds of freedom . . .

I thought it was pretty sick...

john

Why do you think it "sick?" If past performance is even the slightest
indication of future performance, a wag might offer that the 'guide' has
more to worry about than the bird, but IAC, the description above isn't
truly reflective of most such hunts. Moreover, unless you refuse to
fish in any water that might possibly contained stocked fish, IMO, your
criticism of another's method of hunting is hypocritical. You seem to
assign at least some importance to the "4 seconds of freedom." How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

unpsortingly sick....sickly unsporting...sickeningly
unsporting...unspprtingly sickening....sport sick...sick sport...sickening
sport...sportingly sick...sporting sick....that's about all I can think of
offhand...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...

I'd hit the sumbitch forcing you to fish there in the mouth...in the
event you are the sumbitch forcing you to do something that you don't
like, you might consider the advice the doctor gave the person
complaining that it hurt when he jabbed himself in the gut: "don't do
that anymore..." To paraphrase Pogo, you have met the source of your
hypocrisy and he is you...

In your recent journey down thisaway, you had a chance to fish the last
"wild" river around, the Pascagoula. Did you, perchance, avail yourself
of the opportunity? If not, why not?

maybe that's why I always let them go...

To what fate?

TC,
R

john

Why do you think it "sick?" If past performance is even the slightest
indication of future performance, a wag might offer that the 'guide' has
more to worry about than the bird, but IAC, the description above isn't
truly reflective of most such hunts. Moreover, unless you refuse to
fish in any water that might possibly contained stocked fish, IMO, your
criticism of another's method of hunting is hypocritical. You seem to
assign at least some importance to the "4 seconds of freedom." How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.
Frank Reid

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:24:29 -0700, Frank Reid
wrote:

Why do you think it "sick?" If past performance is even the slightest
indication of future performance, a wag might offer that the 'guide' has
more to worry about than the bird, but IAC, the description above isn't
truly reflective of most such hunts. Moreover, unless you refuse to
fish in any water that might possibly contained stocked fish, IMO, your
criticism of another's method of hunting is hypocritical. You seem to
assign at least some importance to the "4 seconds of freedom." How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.

Is the same sumbitch forcing John to fish where he doesn't like to fish
forcing you to not only to go to whore houses, but have sex in them, as
well as to shop at Walmart?

TC,
R
....for example, I don't like anything about Starbucks, so I don't go
there or drink their (alleged) coffee...and if it is a choice between
their (alleged) coffee or no coffee, I choose no coffee...

Frank Reid

How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.
Frank Reid

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:28:37 -0700, Frank Reid
wrote:

How does
the time of freedom matter when the prey is bred and placed strictly for
the amusement of the hunter? IOW, stocked is stocked.

TC,
R
...now, if you had said you personally found it "unsporting"...

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.

Um, Frank, just how many times have been to this whore house and
Walmart...?

TC,
R
Frank Reid

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.

Um, Frank, just how many times have been to this whore house and
Walmart...?

Well, at least I've never been kicked out of a whore house.
http://tinyurl.com/2uvswm

Frank Reid

On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:33:51 -0000, Frank Reid
wrote:

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.

Um, Frank, just how many times have been to this whore house and
Walmart...?

Well, at least I've never been kicked out of a whore house.
http://tinyurl.com/2uvswm

And taking the situation as written, you were not kicked out of Walmart,
certainly not on that occasion. In fact, I'd offer that you were
notified _specifically_ that _you_, with the single condition that _you_
not _wear_ that particular shirt, were welcome, even invited, to return
to that particular store. In fact, based on what you wrote, you were
perfectly free to bring it into the store or wear it in the parking lot
or to any other Walmart, and no one else was put on notice as to their
being prohibited from wearing it at that particular store...the stated
prohibition was specific - _you_ were asked not to _wear it_ _into_
_that_ store again...maybe they thought the color of the shirt didn't
flatter your eyes in the store's lighting or something...

TC,
R

Frank Reid

On Oct 22, 8:31 am, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:33:51 -0000, Frank Reid
wrote:

true, I have fished in stocked waters....can't say I like it much...maybe
that's why I always let them go...

Its kinda like sex in a whore house, yeh its "sex" but you still feel
dirty for years afterwards. Same as shopping in Walmart.

Um, Frank, just how many times have been to this whore house and
Walmart...?

Well, at least I've never been kicked out of a whore house.
http://tinyurl.com/2uvswm

And taking the situation as written, you were not kicked out of Walmart,
certainly not on that occasion. In fact, I'd offer that you were
notified _specifically_ that _you_, with the single condition that _you_
not _wear_ that particular shirt, were welcome, even invited, to return
to that particular store. In fact, based on what you wrote, you were
perfectly free to bring it into the store or wear it in the parking lot
or to any other Walmart, and no one else was put on notice as to their
being prohibited from wearing it at that particular store...the stated
prohibition was specific - _you_ were asked not to _wear it_ _into_
_that_ store again...maybe they thought the color of the shirt didn't
flatter your eyes in the store's lighting or something...

I think they were ****ed 'cause it wasn't made in China.
Frank Reid

ahhh so.