![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:43:18 -0700, riverman
wrote: Suggestions on a basic starter fly box? Mine would contain Harry Mason's Killer Caddis in a couple of sizes. I have never seen a fly work so well. It's a dry, but after the cdc gets soaked, fish it as a wet and it will still catch fish. You have some coming. Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 9:06 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:43:18 -0700, riverman wrote: Suggestions on a basic starter fly box? Mine would contain Harry Mason's Killer Caddis in a couple of sizes. I have never seen a fly work so well. It's a dry, but after the cdc gets soaked, fish it as a wet and it will still catch fish. You have some coming. Dave Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote:
Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 10:40 am, Mike wrote:
On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote: Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC Well, I guess... In any case, I can't open your link here at school, but I'd be very interested in your opinion...for a newbie box that had limited quantities (say, 20 flies); which would you compromise on: diversity of sizes, diversity of styles, or diversity of back-ups? --riverman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 4:28 pm, riverman wrote:
On Nov 2, 10:40 am, Mike wrote: On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote: Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC Well, I guess... In any case, I can't open your link here at school, but I'd be very interested in your opinion...for a newbie box that had limited quantities (say, 20 flies); which would you compromise on: diversity of sizes, diversity of styles, or diversity of back-ups? --riverman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heh heh. Now that I'm home and CAN open the attachment, I see that you seem to be quite prescient. How clever of you. :-) I've never seen a Greenwell's Glory or a Snipe and Purple (although I can attest to a lot of success with other soft hackles in Sweden), but you've answered my question with your article. It seems that a narrow diversity of flies, in a few sizes, with 2 or 3 of each, is the recommendation. I think I agree. Thanks, Mike. --riverman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Nov, 12:27, riverman wrote:
On Nov 2, 4:28 pm, riverman wrote: On Nov 2, 10:40 am, Mike wrote: On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote: Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC Well, I guess... In any case, I can't open your link here at school, but I'd be very interested in your opinion...for a newbie box that had limited quantities (say, 20 flies); which would you compromise on: diversity of sizes, diversity of styles, or diversity of back-ups? --riverman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heh heh. Now that I'm home and CAN open the attachment, I see that you seem to be quite prescient. How clever of you. :-) I've never seen a Greenwell's Glory or a Snipe and Purple (although I can attest to a lot of success with other soft hackles in Sweden), but you've answered my question with your article. It seems that a narrow diversity of flies, in a few sizes, with 2 or 3 of each, is the recommendation. I think I agree. Thanks, Mike. --riverman One may vary the actual flies to a considerable extent. More or less any of Harryīs generic patterns would also suit. The main thing is to stick to a strictly limited selection at first, and concentrate on learning when to use what. Even an extremely limited selection of the right flies will work in most places 70....90% of the time, and using such,automatically removes a lot of variables and confusion, which is important for beginners. Presentation is usually of considerably greater importance than a specific pattern. Also, I try to start people off with generic wet flies/streamers/ nymphs. Dry fly fishing can be quite difficult for a beginner. Can also be fun of course, but a draggging wet fly is much more likely to catch a fish than a dragging dry fly. With regard to sizes, for streamers, specifically woolly buggers, which are probably THE most versatile streamer in existence, I would go for #6 long shanks. For soft hackles, other wet flies and nymphs, #16 and #14. In time, and with experience, one will wish to increase oneīs selection, also to suit specific venues. Tailwater fisheries WILL require other flies for instance, and in small sizes. I obviously donīt know the specifics of your class, but you might like to have a try at making these with them; http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sit...ta rt=10&sa=N (Scroll down to the Singaporean leaders at the bottom of the article). They are easy and quick to make, and work very well indeed. I would also recommend the leader rings; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on.../leaders..html Some set-ups may also be of use to you; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...s/set_ups.html Usually, beginners have the most problems with rigging and knots. If I can be of any further assistance, please donīt hesitate to ask. If you drop me a mail, with your address, I will also send you some of the flies mentioned, for your class. TL MC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Nov, 18:41, Mike wrote:
On 2 Nov, 12:27, riverman wrote: On Nov 2, 4:28 pm, riverman wrote: On Nov 2, 10:40 am, Mike wrote: On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote: Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC Well, I guess... In any case, I can't open your link here at school, but I'd be very interested in your opinion...for a newbie box that had limited quantities (say, 20 flies); which would you compromise on: diversity of sizes, diversity of styles, or diversity of back-ups? --riverman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heh heh. Now that I'm home and CAN open the attachment, I see that you seem to be quite prescient. How clever of you. :-) I've never seen a Greenwell's Glory or a Snipe and Purple (although I can attest to a lot of success with other soft hackles in Sweden), but you've answered my question with your article. It seems that a narrow diversity of flies, in a few sizes, with 2 or 3 of each, is the recommendation. I think I agree. Thanks, Mike. --riverman One may vary the actual flies to a considerable extent. More or less any of Harryīs generic patterns would also suit. The main thing is to stick to a strictly limited selection at first, and concentrate on learning when to use what. Even an extremely limited selection of the right flies will work in most places 70....90% of the time, and using such,automatically removes a lot of variables and confusion, which is important for beginners. Presentation is usually of considerably greater importance than a specific pattern. Also, I try to start people off with generic wet flies/streamers/ nymphs. Dry fly fishing can be quite difficult for a beginner. Can also be fun of course, but a draggging wet fly is much more likely to catch a fish than a dragging dry fly. With regard to sizes, for streamers, specifically woolly buggers, which are probably THE most versatile streamer in existence, I would go for #6 long shanks. For soft hackles, other wet flies and nymphs, #16 and #14. In time, and with experience, one will wish to increase oneīs selection, also to suit specific venues. Tailwater fisheries WILL require other flies for instance, and in small sizes. I obviously donīt know the specifics of your class, but you might like to have a try at making these with them; http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sit...omepage.t-onli... (Scroll down to the Singaporean leaders at the bottom of the article). They are easy and quick to make, and work very well indeed. I would also recommend the leader rings; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on..._ups/Leaders/l... Some set-ups may also be of use to you;http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...s/set_ups.html Usually, beginners have the most problems with rigging and knots. If I can be of any further assistance, please donīt hesitate to ask. If you drop me a mail, with your address, I will also send you some of the flies mentioned, for your class. TL MC OK , read the other thread on this, and found your postal address. Will send the flies to that. Should go off about the end of next week. I donīt know what flies you will be getting from Harry, ( although you may rest assured they will be first class), so I will simply send what I think might be useful. As people here can be quite generous, you will probably end up with a lot of flies. Donīt be tempted to put them all in the boxes! ![]() is contra-productive. Stick to a basic selection, and save the others for your next course. You might also like to make a list of the flies with descriptions and uses. This also aids selection considerably.If you require assistance with that, then let me know. I will enclose such a list for the flies I send. By this, I mean that ONE! generic nymph pattern, one generic caddis pattern, etc, is sufficient to begin with, but at least three of each. This immediately obviates a lot of doubt and confusion, and it ALWAYS!!! works. Much the same applies to sizes. There are some criteria which allow one to select the most useful size of certain flies: Here for instance are the criteria I use for selecting a general nymph size, when I don īt know the exact size required ; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...ear_nymph.html This also works for generic caddis, mayfly, and other patterns. It also makes it a lot easier to choose the right flies. Also choose a limited number of set-ups, ( see previous post) which you are going to use. Donīt try to tell them everything at ionce. Describe a couple of set-ups, and how and why they work. Decide on ONE general knot, for attaching flies etc( I always use the tucked half-blood, also known as the improved clinch), and practice it with them. ( In previous post) Consider pre-configuring fly lines with whatever terminal knots you prefer, ( I prefer a piece of nylon at abou 80% of fly-line diameter, permanently nail knotted to the line and I attach leaders with a loop. One may also use the improved clinch to attacheleaders to such a loop, or to leader rings). TL MC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sit...omepage.t-onli... (Scroll down to the Singaporean leaders at the bottom of the article). They are easy and quick to make, and work very well indeed. Sorry, the first link in that post was wrong of course. Here is the right one; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...nes/lines.html TL MC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 1:41 pm, Mike wrote:
On 2 Nov, 12:27, riverman wrote: On Nov 2, 4:28 pm, riverman wrote: On Nov 2, 10:40 am, Mike wrote: On 2 Nov, 02:32, riverman wrote: Dave, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and I thank you deeply. :-) M ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just wait a while, the dishonourable old ****bag will make sure he gets a pound of flesh for them! Donīt drink his beer either! ![]() MC Well, I guess... In any case, I can't open your link here at school, but I'd be very interested in your opinion...for a newbie box that had limited quantities (say, 20 flies); which would you compromise on: diversity of sizes, diversity of styles, or diversity of back-ups? --riverman- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Heh heh. Now that I'm home and CAN open the attachment, I see that you seem to be quite prescient. How clever of you. :-) I've never seen a Greenwell's Glory or a Snipe and Purple (although I can attest to a lot of success with other soft hackles in Sweden), but you've answered my question with your article. It seems that a narrow diversity of flies, in a few sizes, with 2 or 3 of each, is the recommendation. I think I agree. Thanks, Mike. --riverman One may vary the actual flies to a considerable extent. More or less any of Harryīs generic patterns would also suit. The main thing is to stick to a strictly limited selection at first, and concentrate on learning when to use what. Even an extremely limited selection of the right flies will work in most places 70....90% of the time, and using such,automatically removes a lot of variables and confusion, which is important for beginners. Presentation is usually of considerably greater importance than a specific pattern. Also, I try to start people off with generic wet flies/streamers/ nymphs. Dry fly fishing can be quite difficult for a beginner. Can also be fun of course, but a draggging wet fly is much more likely to catch a fish than a dragging dry fly. With regard to sizes, for streamers, specifically woolly buggers, which are probably THE most versatile streamer in existence, I would go for #6 long shanks. For soft hackles, other wet flies and nymphs, #16 and #14. In time, and with experience, one will wish to increase oneīs selection, also to suit specific venues. Tailwater fisheries WILL require other flies for instance, and in small sizes. I obviously donīt know the specifics of your class, but you might like to have a try at making these with them; http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sit...omepage.t-onli... (Scroll down to the Singaporean leaders at the bottom of the article). They are easy and quick to make, and work very well indeed. I would also recommend the leader rings; http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on..._ups/Leaders/l... Some set-ups may also be of use to you;http://www.mike-connor.homepage.t-on...s/set_ups.html Usually, beginners have the most problems with rigging and knots. If I can be of any further assistance, please donīt hesitate to ask. If you drop me a mail, with your address, I will also send you some of the flies mentioned, for your class. TL MC I got the best fishing advice on patterns from a Bass fisherman of all places. He said whatever you chose to fish with for patterns always bring 3. Why three? Because you can fish with confidence. If you go with 2, and you lose 1, all of your follow up casts will not be as well placed and you will be far more cautious about getting in and around structure. So i have been putting 3 of whatever patterns I chose in the fly box (at least). That way if i lose one, I will still fish the follow up with conviction, and even after losing number 2, I still have one left, and will probably be thinking about the next pattern anyway when searching. This little tid bit has worked great for me personally. I can't tell you how many times I have hit the water with one new fly to try out, lost it on a break off... and wonder if it was a fluke, or if that patterns was "The one". Either way I had no back-up to find out. Hope that helps a little in your choices. Lloyd M The Fishin' Hole http://www.mainetackle.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|