![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some years ago CA Fish and Game came up with the idea that all of the algae
from Bridgeport reservoir was clogging the CA section below the reservoir, and prohibiting any fish reproduction. They tried to flush out the algae with the highwater flows but it did not help fish reprodution. It's hard to sya whether they caused any damage. Another year during a time of drought, The East Walker Water District decided that a third crop of alfalfa was worth draining the Bridgeport reservoir. They drained the reservoir over everyone's objections and doomed the fish downstream during the winter. As you mention, Cal Trout took them to court and there are now regulations concerning the amount of water that can be released. During the winter when the temperatures are warm, this can be as low as 15 cfps. However there have been times when the Nevada Division of Wildlife was concerned about the health of the fish and requested that the flows be increased, I believe to 50 cfps. The Water District has happy to accommodate them. However we're talking about ancient history. During most of the 90's there was an abundance of snowfall and water in the Walker basin. With the higher waterflows, natural reproduction took off and fishing in the East Walker was "trophy fishing". However recently there has not been much snow and the fishing has really fallen off. Also, the publication of several articles about the East Walker increased fishing pressue and didn't help. Natural reproduction is necessary since little of this river below the reservoir is stocked. Now there may be some controls over fishing during the winter months when the flows are low and the fish lethargic. Hopefully we'll get enough snow in the future so that we can get back to type of fishing that occured in the 90'3 "Ernie" wrote in message m... steve, It wasn't the farmers it was the Nevada water board, which strange as it seems, controlled the flow even though the water is in California. I was up there the year it happened and the fellow who owned the Marina was so mad he was spitting nails. It was just a sea of mud. I drove down below for a mile or so and the stream was also a river of mud. They won't do it again. Cal Trout and other groups took them to court and put limits on how much they could draw. "steve" wrote in message ... Not sure if I got the terminology correctly, but this has always been a trophy trout stream that has had its trophy fish killed off by the farmers. Is anyone trying to get it this status, or are the farmers too big of a obstacle? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/28/2003 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wild and Scenic TR with pictures | nope | Fly Fishing | 11 | October 8th, 2003 02:05 AM |