![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Realistically, we shouldn't even use normal monofiliment, because it has a
pretty long life expectancy as well. How many fish have we caught or seen that have run afoul of mono of any type? Each sport comes with its' own set of environmental risks which change as technology changes. I suppose we should all go back to gut leaders, but then PETA will be chaining themselves to cats and whatever else we may use, it is a no win situation. I pick up alot of lost mono etc. on the water while I am out, I figure it more than makes up for the little that I lose. So perhaps that is a fair trade-off, pick up more than you leave behind? "steve" wrote in message ... Fly fisherman usually pride themselves on their environmental responsibility. Yet flourocarbin will basically NEVER decompose. It seems preety environmentally irresponsible to use. What are people's opinions on this? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|