So, OK, he's for change, he gives Chris Mathews a feeling "up his leg," and...

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

If Bush did wrong, he should have been impeached.

I think there's plenty that Bush did wrong. The question is whether it
reached the "high crimes" level. There's a difference between being a
****up and committing a crime.

That said, I think he knowingly trumped up the case for war, and I do think
he should be impeached.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 15 Feb 2008 23:47:53 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

and I do think
he should be impeached.

The Dems in the House don't seem to think so. When any of their
members call for it, it is pushed aside, squashed.

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

On 15 Feb 2008 23:47:53 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

and I do think
he should be impeached.

The Dems in the House don't seem to think so. When any of their
members call for it, it is pushed aside, squashed.

Dave




I have written to my House rep about this. Unfortunately, my House
Representative is an idiot named Randy Kuhl. He got all ****ed at me when
he voted against the NIH budget increase that got vetoed, and he was one of
a few House Members that could provide a veto-proof majority. I pointed
out to the local press that the largest employer of families in his
District depends on that budget, and that he voted against it. Then I
wrote him telling him to expect a phone call on the issue from the local
press.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 16 Feb 2008 01:03:13 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Then I
wrote him telling him to expect a phone call on the issue from the local
press.

Is he still in office? Mine are.

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

On 16 Feb 2008 01:03:13 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Then I
wrote him telling him to expect a phone call on the issue from the local
press.

Is he still in office? Mine are.




Yes, he's still in office.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply