So, OK, he's for change, he gives Chris Mathews a feeling "up his leg," and...

"Jim Edmondson" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:45:24 -0500, Opus--Mark H. Bowen "Opus--Mark H.
Bowen" wrote in message
:


"Jim Edmondson" wrote in message
global.net...
[quoted text muted]

Personally, I'd vote for a convicted child-molester before voting for
either of them, so that leaves me with Obama, if I chose to vote at
all.

I'll refrain from exploring the logical inferences one could draw from
that set of premises

Since Obama has never been accused of molesting children, that I'm aware of,
the only logical inference that could be drawn form what I said, is that I'd
vote for a convicted child-molester before I'd vote for either Hillary
Clinton or John McCain.

I imagine there are a plethora of *illogical* inferences one might could
make about such a statement, but I'd rather not speculate such myself?


As a non-Dem and Non-Repub, I can only say that Obama can't do any worse
than what we have presently.

Op

Maybe we'll get the chance to if you are correct, but I can imagine
lots of ways that "we" would be worse off - you know the saying
about never say never

"worse" is such a relative term and dependent upon individual perspective,
so I guess perpetual warring could possibly have a silver-lining to some
folks?

Op

--
?Jim
posted from Ubuntu/Pan