![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Scott Seidman" wrote: Snip Many recovering alcoholics are not normal happy people. Many are, but many aren't. Snip Scott, Try substituting any of the following words for "recovering alcoholics" in your above statement and please explain to me how the changed statement is any less valid than your original: snip Bob, Try not snipping away all the context from Scott's post and then please explain to me how your commentary isn't silly. -- Ken Fortenberry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message et... Try not snipping away all the context from Scott's post and then please explain to me how your commentary isn't silly. -- Ken Fortenberry My commentary is not silly because when he uses inane statements like " Many recovering alcoholics are not normal happy people. Many are, but many aren't." to bolster his arguement, he is either: 1. Not thinking about what he is actually writing. or 2. Using what, to the casual reader, might at first glance appear to be a meaningful profound statement to set the stage for, and will be reason enough for, many to uncritically accept all the analysis that follows. Scott is no dummy and usually chooses his words carefully, so draw your own conclusions. Bob Weinberger |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Weinberger" wrote in
news:uf%tj.4089$FK2.14@trndny08: Scott is no dummy and usually chooses his words carefully, so draw your own conclusions. Bob Weinberger Yes, my words were chosen in a poor effort not to discourage recovering alcoholics. Whatever it takes not to drink yourself into a state of misery is what they need to do. To back off of my wishy washy disclaimer, IMO, the presidency is not an office for either a well-adjusted or a poorly-adjusted person in recovery. To drift even more off topic, I think its a pity that Ethics committees have more of a problem with a closeted gay guy in a restroom committing a misdemeanor than a drunken drugged up Kennedy offspring driving down the street. -- Scott Reverse name to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Seidman" wrote in message . 1.4... snip To drift even more off topic, I think its a pity that Ethics committees have more of a problem with a closeted gay guy in a restroom committing a misdemeanor than a drunken drugged up Kennedy offspring driving down the street. -- Scott Reverse name to reply Scott, Ethics committees did not go after Craig because he was a "closeted gay guy in a restroom committing a misdemeanor ", or after Clinton because he got a blow job in the oval office, or after Packwood because he gropped women; they went after them because in each case they lied under oath (either in a court proceeding and/or to Congress) about what had happened. The fact that this is not a meaningless distinction is lost on too many people. Bob Weinberger |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Weinberger wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote: Try not snipping away all the context from Scott's post and then please explain to me how your commentary isn't silly. My commentary is not silly because when he uses inane statements like " Many recovering alcoholics are not normal happy people. Many are, but many aren't." to bolster his arguement, he is either: 1. Not thinking about what he is actually writing. or 2. Using what, to the casual reader, might at first glance appear to be a meaningful profound statement to set the stage for, and will be reason enough for, many to uncritically accept all the analysis that follows. Scott is no dummy and usually chooses his words carefully, so draw your own conclusions. Scott's argument as I read it was that mental health professionals have identified several personality and behavioral attributes which many recovering alcoholics have in common. So let's look at the behaviors and personality of a specific recovering alcoholic over the last seven years and notice the similarities. Now out of all that you picked one sentence, presented it totally out of context and then jumped on it with both feet. My conclusion, as I've already implied, is that your commentary is silly. -- Ken Fortenberry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A little "update" on Creoles and "recipes".... | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 3 | January 2nd, 2008 06:45 PM |
100's of Colorado rivers could be classified "wild and scenic" | Halfordian Golfer | Fly Fishing | 2 | September 11th, 2007 07:10 AM |
Info on "Slip-on" "Bait Jail" needed | Fins | Bass Fishing | 0 | March 7th, 2007 03:05 PM |
"GIs Angle For Quiet Time At Baghdad School Of Fly Fishing" | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 3 | May 19th, 2006 03:37 PM |
Missing Woman Case Turns Into "Fish Tale" | Garrison Hilliard | Catfish Fishing | 0 | May 4th, 2006 02:59 PM |