So, OK, he's for change, he gives Chris Mathews a feeling "up his leg," and...

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

Both actions gave
comfort and support to our enemy.

So did the US evacuation of the Bin Laden family when every other
nonmilitary flight was grounded.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
So did the US evacuation of the Bin Laden family when every other
nonmilitary flight was grounded.

oh, sure, Scott....jump on the easy exampleg!
Tom
p.s. Why is it that that event hasn't been questioned more?

"Tom Littleton" wrote in news:fy_tj.21643$s33.3609
@trndny06:


p.s. Why is it that that event hasn't been questioned more?


The first chapter of one of Michael Moore's books deals extensively with
this. The "his family had no involvement with bin Laden" just holds zero
water.

It hasn't been investigated, as NOTHING (aside from the Plame leak, where a
convenient scapegoat was hung out to dry) has been investigated, including
whether the launching of a war thats killed tens of thousands was built on
a pack of systematic lies (you'd think we'd start there, wouldn't you) or
what citizens has the US been spying on without court approval, or have
signing statements violated separation of powers, etc.




--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 17 Feb 2008 17:49:17 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

So did the US evacuation of the Bin Laden family when every other
nonmilitary flight was grounded.

You're reaching, Scott. Our fight is not with his family.

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

On 17 Feb 2008 17:49:17 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

So did the US evacuation of the Bin Laden family when every other
nonmilitary flight was grounded.

You're reaching, Scott. Our fight is not with his family.

Dave




Dave, there really is plenty of evidence that many of his family members
that were evacuated were/are providing financial support. Plus, one week
or so (the time between the event and the evacuation) really wasn't long
enought to determine whether all of these folks were or were not material
witnesses. They were evacuated because the Bushes, the Carlyle Group, and
the bin Laden's are tight, pure and simple. Think about it-- the WTC falls
down around our ankles, and one of the governement's first acts is to
remember to exempt a nonmilitary flight from the shutdown so the bin Ladens
could be evacuated. It stinks to high heaven, Dave. Why do you continue
to excuse it?

Let's not forget the "blame Iraq, but evacuate the bin Laden's", which is
evidence that the big lie for war was waiting in the wings.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

On 17 Feb 2008 18:47:15 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

Why do you continue
to excuse it?

I don't excuse it, Scott, I just think it is not that big a deal.

You excuse my feelings about the shame of Clinton in the WH. No
difference.