Fly Tie-ers

On Mar 19, 4:30 pm, notbob wrote:

Well, of course you don't. The fact you've mis-quoted and mis-
represented everything I've said is proof enough you'll say whatever it
takes to maintain your psychotic attack against an imagined threat to
your status in the group. Heaven forbid some stranger challenge the
mighty frothberry in his domain. You dare not risk losing face in front
of your fans. So, by all means, continue twisting reality and spewing
foul-mouthed slanders. AT this point I expect nothing less.

I don't suppose it's dawned on you yet that you're exhibiting the exact
attitude and behavior toward me that you accuse me of exhibiting. Naw,
I didn't think so. I can see ya'll prefer fishing da' Nile.

nb


Not really a bad analysis, but there are a couple of flaws. He has no
fans, he just does not like losing face period, as he thinks it is
somehow important to assert himself on this group, and the only way he
can do that ( in his twisted understanding) is to attack others.

Furthermore, he only does this because he has virtually nothing else
to say, certainly nothing at all of any interest or importance to an
angler. Indeed, apart from some crap about football now and again,
presumably to assert his masculinity, which he obviously has a problem
with, all he posts are personal attacks, lies, and bull****, and he
can keep on attacking and provoking people for a very long time
without getting sick of it, as it makes him feel important
and"noticed".

Of course it is pathetic, but there is no way anybody will ever make
him understand that. It really is best just to ignore him. This ****es
him off far more than anything else.

His recent attack on Tim Walker was an excellent case in point. There
was only one reply to the insulting **** he posted, ( No cocoanut for
guessing who that was! ). Everybody else ignored it, and it simply
died.

It would seem that he attempts to fuel his artificially induced
fervour on these things with other people´s anger and frustration. If
you ignore him, he simply has no fuel.

Basically just an extremely obnoxious, totally powerless, and
completely uninteresting ****.

MC

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:51:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:05:31 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
...
Sprattoo, I was wondering if/when anyone actually read the article. I
still can't figure out how my "signature" became such a hot topic....
Especially since the sig dosen't mention any particular country of
origin. ...
LOL !! The old "Well, who says I'm talking about Latinos ?" dodge.
That's the same excuse the other anonymous bigot tried to trot out.
Is there some sort of Anonymous Bigots Handbook you guys consult ?

Hey Ken,
The only people that I am "bigoted" against are those with closed
minds. I have ZERO problem with folks coming to this great country of
ours, from anyplace in the world, as long as they do it as my
ancestors did - Legally. If the government were to change the laws
that made it legal for anyone that manages to get inside our borders
to stay here, then I would have no problem. But until that time,
ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL .... no different than crack dealers or the guy
that wants to fish the Gallatin or Madison with ANFO, Semtex charges
or a gill-net.



There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

Now you are trying to mix apples and oranges. All of a sudden you
can't come up with a reasonable, coherent response, and you change
subjects.....You're not a politician by profession are you? According
to your logic(?), if I have willing buyers, it is OK for me to take a
bunch of Rotenone grenades and start fishing the Gallatin for profit.

And you and I both know that the undocumented workers you're
talking about are Hispanic. That's why your .sig is offensive.

Sorry Ken, your crystal ball seems to need a bit of cleaning or you
need to back off of the booze and meds a bit. When you profess to
"know" what I am talking about, *something* is fogging your thought
process.

If you want to post offensive slogans you should come up
with one that's a slur against the people who knowingly hire
undocumented workers.

Slur? Just where did I use a *slur*??? I also believe that those who
knowingly employ, aid or harbor illegal aliens should be prosecuted to
the fullest extent of the law.

Until then you're just another anonymous bigot.

Ken, it appears that the only bigot here, is you. You seem to be
bigoted against free speech, thought and anyone who doesn't worship at
the Altar of Fortenberry. You sure have changed over the years.

Tell us Ken, just what part of I-L-L-E-G-A-L do you not understand or
comprehend?
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:51:27 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:05:31 GMT, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
...
Sprattoo, I was wondering if/when anyone actually read the article. I
still can't figure out how my "signature" became such a hot topic....
Especially since the sig dosen't mention any particular country of
origin. ...
LOL !! The old "Well, who says I'm talking about Latinos ?" dodge.
That's the same excuse the other anonymous bigot tried to trot out.
Is there some sort of Anonymous Bigots Handbook you guys consult ?

Hey Ken,
The only people that I am "bigoted" against are those with closed
minds. I have ZERO problem with folks coming to this great country of
ours, from anyplace in the world, as long as they do it as my
ancestors did - Legally. If the government were to change the laws
that made it legal for anyone that manages to get inside our borders
to stay here, then I would have no problem. But until that time,
ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL .... no different than crack dealers or the guy
that wants to fish the Gallatin or Madison with ANFO, Semtex charges
or a gill-net.



There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

Now you are trying to mix apples and oranges. All of a sudden you
can't come up with a reasonable, coherent response, and you change
subjects.....You're not a politician by profession are you? According
to your logic(?), if I have willing buyers, it is OK for me to take a
bunch of Rotenone grenades and start fishing the Gallatin for profit.

And you and I both know that the undocumented workers you're
talking about are Hispanic. That's why your .sig is offensive.

Sorry Ken, your crystal ball seems to need a bit of cleaning or you
need to back off of the booze and meds a bit. When you profess to
"know" what I am talking about, *something* is fogging your thought
process.

If you want to post offensive slogans you should come up
with one that's a slur against the people who knowingly hire
undocumented workers.

Slur? Just where did I use a *slur*??? I also believe that those who
knowingly employ, aid or harbor illegal aliens should be prosecuted to
the fullest extent of the law.

Until then you're just another anonymous bigot.

Ken, it appears that the only bigot here, is you. You seem to be
bigoted against free speech, thought and anyone who doesn't worship at
the Altar of Fortenberry. You sure have changed over the years.

Tell us Ken, just what part of I-L-L-E-G-A-L do you not understand or
comprehend?
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

Lookee here now, not (you don't mind if I call you by your first
name.....right?), an illegal alien (not a proper noun.....no need to
capitalize in standard English) IS an undocumented worker (ditto) assuming
he or she works (which IS, after all, what he or she came here for, as has
evidently escaped your razor keen notice). A crack dealer (no need to
capitalize.....see above) is NOT (expect in instances rare enough to be
entirely dismissible) a pharmacist (no need to capitalize for reasons which
should be pretty clear to anyone but you and a few other slow learners by
now) at all, illegal or otherwise. Thus, contrary to the comical excuse for
logic unblushingly displayed to public view above, the one is nothing at all
like the other. You see the problem with using a poorly comprehended
language to disseminate half-witted aphorisms that say nothing whatsoever
about what you think it is you are bleating about while making proper
identification of specimens like yourself a ridiculously simply task, even
for the likes of kennies?

No, of course you don't.

notbob? nothome? nothere? Well, perhaps. But certainly notbright.

Wolfgang

Wolfgang

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

Now you are trying to mix apples and oranges. All of a sudden you
can't come up with a reasonable, coherent response, and you change
subjects.....

I don't know what subject you're talking about but I'm talking
about your offensive .sig where you slur undocumented workers
by comparing them to crack dealers.

If you want to post offensive slogans you should come up
with one that's a slur against the people who knowingly hire
undocumented workers.

Slur? Just where did I use a *slur*??? ...

Yes, slur. Comparing undocumented workers to crack dealers is
a bigoted slur and it's offensive.

You seem to be
bigoted against free speech, thought and anyone who doesn't worship at
the Altar of Fortenberry. ...

What a bunch of crap. I'm all for free speech and free thought.
You, of course are perfectly free to post an offensive slogan
with every post just as I am free to point out how disgusting
and bigoted it is.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Mike wrote:

Not really a bad analysis, but there are a couple of flaws. ...

As predictable as it was inevitable, the sewer backs up into
roff and His Loony Mikeness reappears floating in on the sewage.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Mar 21, 1:46 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
Mike wrote:

Not really a bad analysis, but there are a couple of flaws. ...

As predictable as it was inevitable, the sewer backs up into
roff and His Loony Mikeness reappears floating in on the sewage.

--
Ken Fortenberry

You being more the nasty encrusted type of **** that sticks to the rim
eh?

MC

On Mar 21, 8:09 am, wrote:

Anyway Bob, ( or not, as the case may be), if you want to talk about
fishing, just do it it and ignore these idiots. You will get more and
better information elsewhere, but if you can manage to navigate
through the crap here, and deem it worth the effort, you might get
some useful information.

MC

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:56:34 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

Now you are trying to mix apples and oranges. All of a sudden you
can't come up with a reasonable, coherent response, and you change
subjects.....

I don't know what subject you're talking about but I'm talking
about your offensive .sig where you slur undocumented workers
by comparing them to crack dealers.

If you want to post offensive slogans you should come up
with one that's a slur against the people who knowingly hire
undocumented workers.

Slur? Just where did I use a *slur*??? ...

Yes, slur. Comparing undocumented workers to crack dealers is
a bigoted slur and it's offensive.

Ken, I have never compared illegal aliens to crack dealers....just the
bull**** *PC* terminology. Just for the hell of it, why don't you try
looking up the difference between a metaphor and a similie.

Sort of wondering why you don't defend your logic(?) where you stated:
There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.
And I replied: ....."if I have willing buyers, it is OK for me to take
a bunch of Rotenone grenades and start fishing the Gallatin for
profit.
--
Calling an Illegal Alien an "Undocumented Worker" is like calling a
Crack Dealer an "Unlicensed Pharmacist"

wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Yes, slur. Comparing undocumented workers to crack dealers is
a bigoted slur and it's offensive.

Ken, I have never compared illegal aliens to crack dealers....

Just like the other anonymous bigot, you don't even have the
courage of your own repugnant convictions.

Sort of wondering why you don't defend your logic(?) where you stated:
There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

My statement contains no logic in need of a defense.

--
Ken Fortenberry

On Mar 22, 12:43 pm, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:
wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Yes, slur. Comparing undocumented workers to crack dealers is
a bigoted slur and it's offensive.

Ken, I have never compared illegal aliens to crack dealers....

Just like the other anonymous bigot, you don't even have the
courage of your own repugnant convictions.

Sort of wondering why you don't defend your logic(?) where you stated:
There is a *huge* difference between undocumented workers
who are encouraged by unscrupulous Americans to come here
and harvest our crops, build our homes, work in our canning
factories and a crack dealer.

My statement contains no logic in need of a defense.

--
Ken Fortenberry

Sometimes, less is more;

"My statement contains no logic"

Just as a matter of interest, why aren´t you here; http://www.kkk.com/
or somewhere similar, telling those people what arseholes they are,
instead of on this fly-fishing group making mountains out of every
molehill, and supplying the dirt yourself?

MC