![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave LaCourse wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws&feature=related Obama is a smart guy. So is his very impressive wife. The dumb person is the one who thinks Obama really does think there are 57 states, just because it came out of his mouth. For smart people, like Obama, the tongue slips every 100,000 words or so. For Bush, something vaguely intelligent slips out, every 100,000 words or so. Yale (where Bush went to school) is famous for being a tough, top-knotch school that looks the other way for dumb but rich alumni children. Even Princeton used to do that, not too long ago. Bush fit that Yalie profile to a T. But for minority scholarship students, like both Michelle and Barack, you had to be on top of your game. Smiling and looking the other way was only offered to children of the Skull and Bones guys. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:32:44 -0600, salmobytes
wrote: Dave LaCourse wrote: http://youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws&feature=related Obama is a smart guy. So is his very impressive wife. The dumb person is the one who thinks Obama really does think there are 57 states, just because it came out of his mouth. For smart people, like Obama, the tongue slips every 100,000 words or so. For Bush, something vaguely intelligent slips out, every 100,000 words or so. Yale (where Bush went to school) is famous for being a tough, top-knotch school that looks the other way for dumb but rich alumni children. Even Princeton used to do that, not too long ago. Bush fit that Yalie profile to a T. But for minority scholarship students, like both Michelle and Barack, you had to be on top of your game. Smiling and looking the other way was only offered to children of the Skull and Bones guys. Hee-hee-hee...you're obviously a Harvard type... SNICKER, R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:02:25 -0600, salmobytes
wrote: wrote: Hee-hee-hee...you're obviously a Harvard type... No, Harvard does it too. That's how they get those huge endowments. If you're a third generation Yalie from an old-rich blue blood Bentley-driving family, your kids not only get into school, they don't get bounced either. And while I'm not the expert on Harvard's entrance policies and procedures that you are on Yale's, I have some personal knowledge of both. I'd offer that in the 70s and 80s, Obama, being a minority legacy, had a large headstart to a Harvard admission. While Obama likes, even encourages (or at the minimum, doesn't discourage) the whole humble background bit, ala Bill Clinton (and Hillary, depending...), it is, overall, as much bull**** as Clinton's bull****. And as "they don't get bounced," you have no idea of about what you speak. IAC, by all accounts, Bush was an average student, no more, no less, and whatever "help" you believe his family might have been able to provide was never needed. I went one year to the Princeton Country Day School, which was a pretentious wannabe clone of an English public school (back then, anyway). I remember one 8th grade kid who came to school everyday in a 3 piece suit, carrying a brief case, delivered by chauffeured Bentley. And the driver wore one of those funny uniforms too. Sounds like a sit-com... I remember that particular kid was an introverted hard worker. They had a huge stone wall, castle-like mansion out on Stoney Brook, with majestic iron gates and a long, hedge-lined white gravel driveway. Ah, well, then, that explains the relevance... The also had a mile or more of pristine trout habitat at the upper reaches of Stoney Brook. I poached out there even then. So, let's recap - you were offered a chance to attend a good school and make friends with a rich hard-working kid who dressed nicely, and instead, you chose to steal from it and rationalize your failure there... Which made it all a bit deliciously ironic. Ah, so you're still a thief... But there were plenty of ****-off ultra-rich smart-asses there too. It didn't matter. They were rich and they were going to stay that way no matter what. And they knew it. And it appears the reasons behind your attitude are exposed... Michelle Obama grew up on on the south side of Chicago. Emerging from that environment, as she did, was no small achievement. More bull****. Given the number of folks to whom such is attributed, it's a fairly common type of thing. Heck, didn't John Kerry's campaign even try to pull off some form of the "worked his way up...outta the Hamptons" crapola. IAC, the bottom line is that while schools like Harvard and Yale (and really, all schools) generally have an admissions policy, even if unofficial, that favors legacies, they don't pass out degrees for kicks, and those who are graduated weren't just handed one because they are a legacy. And if you think they do, that doesn't say much for the school, and therefore, much about either Obama's degree. HTH, R |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:02:25 -0600, salmobytes wrote: wrote: Hee-hee-hee...you're obviously a Harvard type... No, Harvard does it too. That's how they get those huge endowments. If you're a third generation Yalie from an old-rich blue blood Bentley-driving family, your kids not only get into school, they don't get bounced either. And while I'm not the expert on Harvard's entrance policies and procedures that you are on Yale's, I have some personal knowledge of both. I'd offer that in the 70s and 80s, Obama, being a minority legacy, had a large headstart to a Harvard admission. While Obama likes, even encourages (or at the minimum, doesn't discourage) the whole humble background bit, ala Bill Clinton (and Hillary, depending...), it is, overall, as much bull**** as Clinton's bull****. And as "they don't get bounced," you have no idea of about what you speak. IAC, by all accounts, Bush was an average student, no more, no less, and whatever "help" you believe his family might have been able to provide was never needed. I went one year to the Princeton Country Day School, which was a pretentious wannabe clone of an English public school (back then, anyway). I remember one 8th grade kid who came to school everyday in a 3 piece suit, carrying a brief case, delivered by chauffeured Bentley. And the driver wore one of those funny uniforms too. Sounds like a sit-com... I remember that particular kid was an introverted hard worker. They had a huge stone wall, castle-like mansion out on Stoney Brook, with majestic iron gates and a long, hedge-lined white gravel driveway. Ah, well, then, that explains the relevance... The also had a mile or more of pristine trout habitat at the upper reaches of Stoney Brook. I poached out there even then. So, let's recap - you were offered a chance to attend a good school and make friends with a rich hard-working kid who dressed nicely, and instead, you chose to steal from it and rationalize your failure there... Which made it all a bit deliciously ironic. Ah, so you're still a thief... But there were plenty of ****-off ultra-rich smart-asses there too. It didn't matter. They were rich and they were going to stay that way no matter what. And they knew it. And it appears the reasons behind your attitude are exposed... Michelle Obama grew up on on the south side of Chicago. Emerging from that environment, as she did, was no small achievement. More bull****. Given the number of folks to whom such is attributed, it's a fairly common type of thing. Heck, didn't John Kerry's campaign even try to pull off some form of the "worked his way up...outta the Hamptons" crapola. IAC, the bottom line is that while schools like Harvard and Yale (and really, all schools) generally have an admissions policy, even if unofficial, that favors legacies, they don't pass out degrees for kicks, and those who are graduated weren't just handed one because they are a legacy. And if you think they do, that doesn't say much for the school, and therefore, much about either Obama's degree. ![]() Wolfgang |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "salmobytes" wrote in message ... rambled: Stealing (fish) from the rich is our patriotic duty. As succinct and clear a demonstration of the fact that the noun "duty" need not be preceded by the adjective "onerous" as any reasonable person could ask for. Wolfgang who tries hard not to let any opportunity for joy slip by unremarked. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:20:59 -0600, salmobytes
wrote: rambled: ...yes, I was a teenage (fishing/poaching) thief. I used to sneak in to Clark's Pond on the north side of Princeton too, with black friends from "down town." They had guard dogs there, so it was a bit dicey. But boy they sure did have some big bass in that pond. Stealing (fish) from the rich is our patriotic duty. Ah. In that case, post your address and bank info. I'm sure that you'll not object to those much less-fortunate than yourself stealing from you. In fact, why not just give everything you have to those less-fortunate so as to not make them have to steal. Actually, what are you doing with anything? It would seem foolish to acquire things that you realize others are duty-bound to steal from you.... HTH, R ....I wonder, rhetorically of course, what your reaction and attitude would be if one of your black friends from downtown was caught in the act of doing their duty by robbing you blind...and they could show that you were "richer" than them... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:20:59 -0600, salmobytes wrote: rambled: ...yes, I was a teenage (fishing/poaching) thief. I used to sneak in to Clark's Pond on the north side of Princeton too, with black friends from "down town." They had guard dogs there, so it was a bit dicey. But boy they sure did have some big bass in that pond. Stealing (fish) from the rich is our patriotic duty. Ah. In that case, post your address and bank info. I'm sure that you'll not object to those much less-fortunate than yourself stealing from you. In fact, why not just give everything you have to those less-fortunate so as to not make them have to steal. Actually, what are you doing with anything? It would seem foolish to acquire things that you realize others are duty-bound to steal from you.... HTH, R ...I wonder, rhetorically of course, what your reaction and attitude would be if one of your black friends from downtown was caught in the act of doing their duty by robbing you blind...and they could show that you were "richer" than them... Have you ever wondered how life might be different if you understood what anyone was saying to you? Ever wonder how life might be different if you understood the previous question? Ever wonder what makes you pathetic and miserable? Ever wonder what it might be like to have something to say? Ever wonder what self respect feels like? Well, it doesn't matter, does it? Wolfgang who, in anticipation of a guaranteed sudden windfall, is making a BIG shopping list! ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dumb redfish question | Ken Fortenberry[_2_] | Fly Fishing | 4 | April 23rd, 2008 11:16 PM |
Dumb oakies | Mike[_6_] | Fly Fishing | 6 | November 15th, 2007 06:55 AM |
Dumb oakies | Mike[_6_] | Fly Fishing | 0 | November 14th, 2007 09:24 PM |
dumb laws | rw | Fly Fishing | 16 | May 27th, 2005 11:52 PM |
$60 Dumb Mistake | RGarri7470 | Bass Fishing | 4 | February 11th, 2004 03:05 AM |