![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 10, 4:20*am, jeff miller wrote:
wrote: * * *- Ken look closer at the number of acres being lost annually in agricultural regions of the south...don't you think that is an awful lot? Not to be too flippant, but why do I care if farmland in the south gets converted to urban land? ...and therein is the problem revealed.... no sense in discussing the issue with you. I'm being purposefully flippant. To be more honest, urban sprawl is essentially a local problem. If you don't like your local urban sprawl then vote your local *******s out. As someone who lives in an "Urban Growth Boundary", you might not like the alternatives either. Primary problem is too many people breeding too many more people. Going back to the original point in this, as long as it's just private land changing hands and the public land is being managed well, what's the issue? * *- Ken yeah...again, i find it hard to believe you are that narrow-minded...until now, i never suspected such. what happens when all the "private" farmland and forests are gone to condos, parking lots, etc? *rainforests?? *hell janik...why should you and i worry about anything...won't be much change by the time we're dust... * anyway, i'm leaving this morning for a trip west...and working at the great mystery again. I think I work with data too much. A 1.7% change over 40 years is essentially no change. I'm confident that the error bars in the data are larger than that change. - Ken |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:18:11 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Jul 10, 4:20*am, jeff miller wrote: wrote: * * *- Ken look closer at the number of acres being lost annually in agricultural regions of the south...don't you think that is an awful lot? Not to be too flippant, but why do I care if farmland in the south gets converted to urban land? ...and therein is the problem revealed.... no sense in discussing the issue with you. I'm being purposefully flippant. To be more honest, urban sprawl is essentially a local problem. If you don't like your local urban sprawl then vote your local *******s out. As someone who lives in an "Urban Growth Boundary", you might not like the alternatives either. Primary problem is too many people breeding too many more people. Going back to the original point in this, as long as it's just private land changing hands and the public land is being managed well, what's the issue? * *- Ken yeah...again, i find it hard to believe you are that narrow-minded...until now, i never suspected such. what happens when all the "private" farmland and forests are gone to condos, parking lots, etc? *rainforests?? *hell janik...why should you and i worry about anything...won't be much change by the time we're dust... * anyway, i'm leaving this morning for a trip west...and working at the great mystery again. I think I work with data too much. A 1.7% change over 40 years is essentially no change. I'm confident that the error bars in the data are larger than that change. - Ken The humorous thing about this whole thing is that it is not like Donald Trump trying to cover all of Central Park with CLASSY!!!! skyscrapers and concrete, but rather, it's like Tom Keller trying to buy Tavern on the Green...and turning it into a restaurant...(and speaking of pearls before swine...) HTH, R |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
montana | jeff | Fly Fishing | 0 | February 1st, 2007 01:35 PM |
Only in Montana | salmobytes | Fly Fishing | 2 | October 4th, 2006 03:40 AM |
Buy, Bye, Montana | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 4 | September 8th, 2005 06:17 AM |
TR Montana | [email protected] | Fly Fishing | 0 | July 18th, 2005 02:40 AM |
Which end? in Montana | Larry L | Fly Fishing | 8 | January 26th, 2004 11:25 PM |