No bums allowed at the limo liberal spectacular...

On Jul 17, 3:18*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:29:08 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:05:33 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Jul 16, 5:40 pm, wrote:
Two funny things with regard to the Dem convention in Denver...

Homeless people are being given museum and movie tickets, among other
schemes, to get them the heck outta downtown for the convention,

So how many tickets do you get if you promise to stay away? *What
happens
if you change your mind *after* you get the tickets? *Are you allowed
to sell
them if you don't come back?

and

Obama's choice to move his speech to the stadium will apparently
quadruple the "carbon footprint" of the entire convention over his
giving it at the convention center, and that only takes into account the
facility load, not the additional load of getting all of the extra folks
to the stadium. *Supposedly, the speech alone will also have
approximately 4 times the carbon footprint of the GOP convention, as
well. *Hmmm...I guess he might be leaning toward Al "Green Like Me"
Gore...well, if the convention folks can arrange to land all the Goron
Gulfstreams, including Gore's, and find a place to park all the stretch
Hummers to cart all of them to rented mansions and hotel floors...

It's nice to see the outer fringe take such an interest in carbon
footprints
(I always keep a pan of coal dust next to the front door, and step in
it
before heading out in the morning).

http://online.wsj.com/public/article....html?mod=blog

"The host committee for the Democratic National Convention wanted
15,000 fanny packs for volunteers. But they had to be made of organic
cotton. By unionized labor. In the USA.

Official merchandiser Bob DeMasse scoured the country. His weary
conclusion: "That just doesn't exist." *"

No wonder we are slipping as a nation. *The effin liberals will give
it all away. *Thankfully, I will be dead before that happens. *

Idiots.

Dave
(at Lakewood for the sixth time, awaiting Myron)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, you are full of **** as far as your political awareness. It
doesn't seem to matter to you how many of the crowd you voted in
steal, get caught, betray American intelligence officers, sell arms to
our enemies, cavort with male prostitutes, shoot each other in the
face, cook the books, cheat on their spouses, lie under oath, etc etc
etc.

I think you could personally witness the Bushies bindle ****ing girl
monkeys on the White House lawn and you would blame it on the "effin
liberals." And other times I think you must just love to **** people
off with this non-sense, because even a light reading of the US
newspapers would clue you into just what has transpired over the last
7 years.

Dave

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:01:28 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Jul 17, 3:18*pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:29:08 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:05:33 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Jul 16, 5:40 pm, wrote:
Two funny things with regard to the Dem convention in Denver...

Homeless people are being given museum and movie tickets, among other
schemes, to get them the heck outta downtown for the convention,

So how many tickets do you get if you promise to stay away? *What
happens
if you change your mind *after* you get the tickets? *Are you allowed
to sell
them if you don't come back?

and

Obama's choice to move his speech to the stadium will apparently
quadruple the "carbon footprint" of the entire convention over his
giving it at the convention center, and that only takes into account the
facility load, not the additional load of getting all of the extra folks
to the stadium. *Supposedly, the speech alone will also have
approximately 4 times the carbon footprint of the GOP convention, as
well. *Hmmm...I guess he might be leaning toward Al "Green Like Me"
Gore...well, if the convention folks can arrange to land all the Goron
Gulfstreams, including Gore's, and find a place to park all the stretch
Hummers to cart all of them to rented mansions and hotel floors...

It's nice to see the outer fringe take such an interest in carbon
footprints
(I always keep a pan of coal dust next to the front door, and step in
it
before heading out in the morning).

http://online.wsj.com/public/article....html?mod=blog

"The host committee for the Democratic National Convention wanted
15,000 fanny packs for volunteers. But they had to be made of organic
cotton. By unionized labor. In the USA.

Official merchandiser Bob DeMasse scoured the country. His weary
conclusion: "That just doesn't exist." *"

No wonder we are slipping as a nation. *The effin liberals will give
it all away. *Thankfully, I will be dead before that happens. *

Idiots.

Dave
(at Lakewood for the sixth time, awaiting Myron)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David, you are full of **** as far as your political awareness. It
doesn't seem to matter to you how many of the crowd you voted in
steal, get caught, betray American intelligence officers, sell arms to
our enemies, cavort with male prostitutes, shoot each other in the
face, cook the books, cheat on their spouses, lie under oath, etc etc
etc.

I think you could personally witness the Bushies bindle ****ing girl
monkeys on the White House lawn and you would blame it on the "effin
liberals." And other times I think you must just love to **** people
off with this non-sense, because even a light reading of the US
newspapers would clue you into just what has transpired over the last
7 years.

Dave
I guess what I don't understand is what was so bad about the Dems
trying to find something for there freebies that wouldn't come back
and be used against them by the Rovians. Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs? If they had been made in China it
would have been on Rush's show the next day as an example of how
hypocritical the Dems are.

And make no mistake about it. The Repubs are desperate. Take, for
example, Richard's huge "carbon footprint" of Mile High as opposed to
the Pepsi Center. McCainites know that Obama giving a speech in that
venue was a masterpiece of political staging. So they have to try to
find something to damage the impact the speech will have. Apparently
the best they can come up with is the increased carbon footprint
thing. Of course they conveniently forget to mention that Mile High
holds 76,000 people. The Pepsi Center holds about a quarter of that.
So in fact the carbon footprint, even if it is 4X that of the Pepsi
Center (which I doubt... no air conditioning needed at Mile High), is
moot since it holds 4X the people. The "carbon footprint" per person
would be identical. Or are they saying that because 4x the number of
people will see Obama then there will be 4x the carbon footprint. In
that case the only thing Barry could do would be to give his
acceptance speech in his living room to Michelle and the girls.


hth


Geo. C.


Who is looking forward to the news films of those little girls running
around the White House. Nothing like the father of young kids to liven
up the Presidency.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/...psons_2008.jpg

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:

Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs?

Of course not. But like the guy said, try to find one made by union
labor (biggest **** deal in this country), and certain kind of cotton.
They could have had a company make the damn things and be done with
it, but noooooooo, they have to qualify it so that they look good.

****in' unions suck, BIG TIME!

Dave

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs?


Of course not. But like the guy said, try to find one made by union
labor (biggest **** deal in this country), and certain kind of cotton.
They could have had a company make the damn things and be done with
it, but noooooooo, they have to qualify it so that they look good.

****in' unions suck, BIG TIME!

The Dems are sell-outs. The fanny packs should be made of hemp.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs?


Of course not. But like the guy said, try to find one made by union
labor (biggest **** deal in this country), and certain kind of cotton.
They could have had a company make the damn things and be done with
it, but noooooooo, they have to qualify it so that they look good.

****in' unions suck, BIG TIME!

Yeah, nothing could be worse than than organized workers trying to make
management deal fairly with them.

Tim Lysyk
Local Steward, PIPSC

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:41:23 GMT, Tim Lysyk
wrote:

Yeah, nothing could be worse than than organized workers trying to make
management deal fairly with them.

Gee, it wonderful the way 90% of Americans get along quite well
without unions and their corruption. Look up the word "merit".

Dave
(up very early getting ready to pick up Riverman)

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:03:46 -0400, Dave LaCourse
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:41:23 GMT, Tim Lysyk
wrote:

Yeah, nothing could be worse than than organized workers trying to make
management deal fairly with them.

Gee, it wonderful the way 90% of Americans get along quite well
without unions and their corruption. Look up the word "merit".

Dave
(up very early getting ready to pick up Riverman)

Yep I'm as corrupt as they come.


Geo. Cleveland
Chief Steward
Local 77-P GCC/IBT


Yeah thats right, I'm a Teamster too.

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


I guess what I don't understand is what was so bad about the Dems
trying to find something for there freebies that wouldn't come back
and be used against them by the Rovians. Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs? If they had been made in China it
would have been on Rush's show the next day as an example of how
hypocritical the Dems are.

Well, of course it would. But the issue is not really what Limpdick
might or might not have made of it, its about talk versus action. A
whole pack of Dem pols pay all sorts of lip service to "being green"
(ala Gore) while not personally doing **** about it if it impinges upon
their personal lives in a detrimental way.

And make no mistake about it. The Repubs are desperate. Take, for
example, Richard's huge "carbon footprint" of Mile High as opposed to
the Pepsi Center. McCainites know that Obama giving a speech in that
venue was a masterpiece of political staging.

Er, nope.

So they have to try to
find something to damage the impact the speech will have. Apparently
the best they can come up with is the increased carbon footprint
thing. Of course they conveniently forget to mention that Mile High
holds 76,000 people. The Pepsi Center holds about a quarter of that.
So in fact the carbon footprint, even if it is 4X that of the Pepsi
Center (which I doubt... no air conditioning needed at Mile High),

Wrong.

is
moot since it holds 4X the people. The "carbon footprint" per person
would be identical. Or are they saying that because 4x the number of
people will see Obama then there will be 4x the carbon footprint. In
that case the only thing Barry could do would be to give his
acceptance speech in his living room to Michelle and the girls.

The simple fact - yes, fact - is that much like Live Earth, the decision
to do the speech in a stadium versus the convention center is another
example of, to quote those well-known right-wing conservatives Roger
Daltrey and Pete Townsend, "private planes for climate change"...

For all the burying of balloons in compost heaps and organic, union-made
bags, there is at least one inconvenient truth: that this thing is gonna
have a disproportionate environmental impact. And all of the partisan
politics anyone wants to spout isn't gonna alter that...

H _T_ H,
R


hth


Geo. C.

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:13:35 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


I guess what I don't understand is what was so bad about the Dems
trying to find something for there freebies that wouldn't come back
and be used against them by the Rovians. Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs? If they had been made in China it
would have been on Rush's show the next day as an example of how
hypocritical the Dems are.

Well, of course it would. But the issue is not really what Limpdick
might or might not have made of it, its about talk versus action. A
whole pack of Dem pols pay all sorts of lip service to "being green"
(ala Gore) while not personally doing **** about it if it impinges upon
their personal lives in a detrimental way.

ahahahahahahahahaha! What drivel!

And make no mistake about it. The Repubs are desperate. Take, for
example, Richard's huge "carbon footprint" of Mile High as opposed to
the Pepsi Center. McCainites know that Obama giving a speech in that
venue was a masterpiece of political staging.

Er, nope.

Um, yup.

So they have to try to
find something to damage the impact the speech will have. Apparently
the best they can come up with is the increased carbon footprint
thing. Of course they conveniently forget to mention that Mile High
holds 76,000 people. The Pepsi Center holds about a quarter of that.
So in fact the carbon footprint, even if it is 4X that of the Pepsi
Center (which I doubt... no air conditioning needed at Mile High),

Wrong.

Actually, right.

is
moot since it holds 4X the people. The "carbon footprint" per person
would be identical. Or are they saying that because 4x the number of
people will see Obama then there will be 4x the carbon footprint. In
that case the only thing Barry could do would be to give his
acceptance speech in his living room to Michelle and the girls.

The simple fact - yes, fact - is that much like Live Earth, the decision
to do the speech in a stadium versus the convention center is another
example of, to quote those well-known right-wing conservatives Roger
Daltrey and Pete Townsend, "private planes for climate change"...

Nonsense. Nice non sequitur, though.

For all the burying of balloons in compost heaps and organic, union-made
bags, there is at least one inconvenient truth: that this thing is gonna
have a disproportionate environmental impact. And all of the partisan
politics anyone wants to spout isn't gonna alter that...

Um, nope.

/daytripper (But thanks for making your agenda even more clear...)

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:27:21 -0400, daytripper
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:13:35 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:59:36 -0500, George Cleveland
wrote:


I guess what I don't understand is what was so bad about the Dems
trying to find something for there freebies that wouldn't come back
and be used against them by the Rovians. Is there something wrong
about American made fanny packs? If they had been made in China it
would have been on Rush's show the next day as an example of how
hypocritical the Dems are.

Well, of course it would. But the issue is not really what Limpdick
might or might not have made of it, its about talk versus action. A
whole pack of Dem pols pay all sorts of lip service to "being green"
(ala Gore) while not personally doing **** about it if it impinges upon
their personal lives in a detrimental way.

ahahahahahahahahaha! What drivel!

And make no mistake about it. The Repubs are desperate. Take, for
example, Richard's huge "carbon footprint" of Mile High as opposed to
the Pepsi Center. McCainites know that Obama giving a speech in that
venue was a masterpiece of political staging.

Er, nope.

Um, yup.

So they have to try to
find something to damage the impact the speech will have. Apparently
the best they can come up with is the increased carbon footprint
thing. Of course they conveniently forget to mention that Mile High
holds 76,000 people. The Pepsi Center holds about a quarter of that.
So in fact the carbon footprint, even if it is 4X that of the Pepsi
Center (which I doubt... no air conditioning needed at Mile High),

Wrong.

Actually, right.

is
moot since it holds 4X the people. The "carbon footprint" per person
would be identical. Or are they saying that because 4x the number of
people will see Obama then there will be 4x the carbon footprint. In
that case the only thing Barry could do would be to give his
acceptance speech in his living room to Michelle and the girls.

The simple fact - yes, fact - is that much like Live Earth, the decision
to do the speech in a stadium versus the convention center is another
example of, to quote those well-known right-wing conservatives Roger
Daltrey and Pete Townsend, "private planes for climate change"...

Nonsense. Nice non sequitur, though.

For all the burying of balloons in compost heaps and organic, union-made
bags, there is at least one inconvenient truth: that this thing is gonna
have a disproportionate environmental impact. And all of the partisan
politics anyone wants to spout isn't gonna alter that...

Um, nope.

/daytripper (But thanks for making your agenda even more clear...)

Oh, I gotta ask - what's my agenda?

Hee-hee,
R