No bums allowed at the limo liberal spectacular...

In article ,
Peaceful Bill wrote:

Janice wrote:
In article ,
Peaceful Bill wrote:

The topic was gas prices. So what have the Dems done about the gas
prices? The dems certainly have had time to put together an energy policy.

And "secret" energy policy? ROTFLMAO!!!!

The dems have done a lot: Get a president in office who will get us out
of Iraq which will decrease the strife in the region, decreasing oil
prices. Guess what will happen if your
retarded-rode-to-school-on-the-small-bus President nukes Iran? Gas will
dramatically increase.


Yeah, that's going to happen. LOL!!!

Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. Ring a bell?





Democrats should be chastised greatly for not doing the obvious, which
republicans would agree with: mainly decreasing the amount of blends
from the 30 or so down to say 2. Or even only one, take the most
stringent one and have everyone use.

What would the Dems do? How about raise taxes on gasoline just when the
country is looking for relief. Yeah, that's what we need!! MORE TAXES!!!

If congress passes this, the Dems don't have a chance in November:

That is why it wont happen. Reduce the amount of blends to a single
blend, the most stringent, or 2 or 3. Possibly make a law to regulate
to reform big oil from strategically taking refineries off line ON
PURPOSE to decrease supply and increase demand, which big oil documents
have shown them to do.

if RDean isn't enjoying himself immensely over the direction this thread has
taken, I would be surprisedg

Tom.

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:17:24 GMT, "Tom Littleton" wrote:

if RDean isn't enjoying himself immensely over the direction this thread has
taken, I would be surprisedg

I don't think he much cares about direction, I think he gets off on duration.
Witness how many words it takes for him to convey the simplest of thoughts...

/daytripper (and I do mean *simplest*)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:17:24 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:


if RDean isn't enjoying himself immensely over the direction this thread has
taken, I would be surprisedg

Tom.

I've not read it all, and probably won't, but the one thing I do find
amusing with all of the little right vs. left "debates" involving folks
in the US firmly entrenched in one camp or the other is that they seem
to actually believe that their one guy (of the moment) is the sole
salvation of the planet and the other one guy (of the moment) is the
sole cause of all the problems of the planet...ah, well, those who don't
know history are doomed to repeat it...again and again and again...

TC,
R

In article ,
wrote:

I've not read it all, and probably won't, but the one thing I do find
amusing with all of the little right vs. left "debates" involving folks
in the US firmly entrenched in one camp or the other is that they seem
to actually believe that their one guy (of the moment) is the sole
salvation of the planet and the other one guy (of the moment) is the
sole cause of all the problems of the planet...ah, well, those who don't
know history are doomed to repeat it...again and again and again...

TC,
R

And I am SO fearing the day when we get a president who reduces the
deficit, cleans the air, cleans the water, has $1.60 gallon gasoline,
but lets 22 year old women give him blow jobs and lies about it. OH THE
HUMANITY! Lieing about receiving a blow job!

Lets instead have a 3 time convict (isnt that called a 3 time loser?),
blow up the deficit by trillions, increase gas almost 3 fold, kill
thousands of US young adults because of a lie. You want to lie about
getting a blow job? Fine! Want to Lie to get thousands of our young
killed and ruin the economy? WHich party supports which?